Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing (1955) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
92 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Sad, larger than life, timely, overreaching, beautiful, etc etc!!
secondtake8 May 2011
Love is a Many-Splendored Thing (1955)

This should have been could have been terrific, and it won five (five!) Academy awards, including for it's now more famous title song. One reason it was a hit was it was deeply romantic and epic and yet dealing with a vividly disturbing issue for Americans, the take over of China by Communist rule.

William Holden, at the height of his fame, holds his own in his restrained and slightly diffident way, and Jennifer Jones is forceful and believable and likable, if a hair too mannered for my taste and too frankly lovely for the good of the movie. This is a love story set against a new kind of wartime, leading eventually to the Korean War, and there is nothing better for a movie than love and war. Ask Tolstoy. The filming is wide screen saturated color in that first two years of this kind of spectacle, and like other films of the mid-fifties it falls victim to being pretty at times. The events are set in Hong Kong and that's part of the visual charm, but it's also a distraction for the filmmakers, drifting (just slightly at times) into a travelogue.

There, all my reservations are out of the way. If you can not worry about how "good" the movie is or what it could have been (compared to others, or just on it's own formal terms), it's a vivid, engrossing, politically loaded situation with two charming and beautiful actors. It might be a surprise that Jones plays a Chinese doctor (Eurasian, officially), Dr. Han Suyin (Jones was actually an Oklahoma girl), but this is what Hollywood was still demanding of its casts, afraid to diversify. And depending on star power to succeed. Holden plays Mark Elliott, a journalist.

As the affair begins between our leads, Dr. Han Suyin (a widow) says to Elliott, after he wonders why she'd go out with a married man, "I thought if you were happily married there could be no danger, and if you weren't it could make no difference." And it begins there, freighted with desire and worry. You know somehow that things will not go smoothly, and they don't, though the plot is oddly prosaic at times. It's partly the script, but also, oddly enough, the filming, with a very static camera (which sits and waits as the actors talk, beautiful backdrops and all). I think Jones and Holden are "creditable" in their roles, a good word because it's so awkward and awful.

One thing that happened for me, in 2011, was getting washed in nostalgia. It's a movie about falling in love as the world is spinning out of control around you. It's before cell phones and constant news--so some of the best scenes are out of touch with everything in the world except the two of them. The music swells, the sun hits the blue waters in the bay, and it seems like a huge escape. I suppose that's what it was for them, from their histories, from their obligations. Eventually the world caught up, however, and things unravel.

Another great thing about the movie, however old-fashioned the approach might seem, is the racial conflicts at work, for and against them. It is maybe the big theme of the movie, when all is said and done. This is a tear jerker of the largest magnitude. Soak it up.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Winning Romantic Concoction
ferbs5424 September 2008
Based on the 1952 autobiography "A Many-Splendoured Thing," "Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing" (1955) tells the story of Han Suyin, focusing on the romance that Han, a widowed Eurasian doctor in 1949 Hong Kong, had with a married American correspondent named Mark Elliott. "I don't want to feel anything again, ever," Han tells Mark soon after they meet, but the two soon develop the mutual irresistibles for each other, and who can blame them? Mark is played by William Holden at the near peak of his hunky-dude period (the following year's "Picnic" would be the peak) in this, the first of three films over the next seven years that would find Holden in China (1960's "The World of Suzie Wong" and 1962's "Satan Never Sleeps" being the others). And Dr. Han is here played by Jennifer Jones, who, although not a Eurasian (unlike yummy Nancy Kwan and pretty France Nuyen of those other exotic Holden films), does a credible job of passing as one. Whether dressed in cheongsam, European frock, surgical gown or (hubba-hubba!) bathing suit, Jones looks ridiculously gorgeous here. No wonder East meets West in this film so dramatically! With its two appealing lead stars, breathtaking Hong Kong scenery, beautiful CinemaScope and color, Oscar-winning costumes and that classic, Oscar-winning title song that wafts through the film like a lovely incense, "Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing" turns out to be quite the winning and romantic concoction. Han herself supposedly did not care for the picture, so I can only imagine that great liberties were taken with her source material. Still, I enjoyed it. And if the film's ending causes a tear to come to the eye, just remember Mark's words of wisdom: "Life's greatest tragedy is not to be loved."
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sentimental romance
perfectbond9 March 2003
This movie will likely be too sentimental for many viewers, especially contemporary audiences. Nevertheless I enjoyed this film thanks mostly to the down-to-earth charm of William Holden, one of my favorite stars, and the dazzling beauty of Jennifer Jones. There are some truly heartwarming scenes between the pair and the talent of these two actors rescues what in lesser hands could've been trite lines. The cinematography of Hong Kong from the period of filming is another highlight of this movie. All in all, a better than average romantic drama, 7/10.
34 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Timeless Classic
ebiros214 December 2011
Some movies just stands up to the changes of time. This is one such movie. Why it never gets old is because it's a quality production, with good settings and story.

I really love this movie, although the story is kind of simple, the situation is not. Jennifer Jones plays an Eurasian woman from Chung King, and William Holden a reporter from Singapore. Two people from a very different background meet in one of the most international city in the world - Hong Kong - where old Chinese culture and new capitalism meet. Now that would be confusing to anyone who's trying to sort out their relationship.

The movie combines all these elements well, and exotic Hong Kong location adds to the beauty of the story. It's interesting to see Hong Kong in 1955, comparing it to Hong Kong of today. Some places looks similar like the Victoria Peak (although it has no high rise buildings), but Aberdeen was much less crowded.

Music score is a real tear jerker.

If you like romance, this is one of the best movie you can watch.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Poignant Doomed Romance
JamesHitchcock21 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
"Love is a Many-Splendored Thing" is set in Hong Kong in 1949-50, and tells the story of the relationship between Mark Elliott, a white American journalist, and Han Suyin, a half-Chinese half-European doctor. This story of a mixed-race love affair was quite a daring theme for the fifties, and, as it often did, Hollywood tried to soften the blow by casting a white actress as the supposedly non-Caucasian woman who falls in love with a white man, something that would be regarded as politically incorrect today but was quite acceptable then.. (Think, for example, of the casting of Ava Gardner in "Show Boat" or Natalie Wood in "West Side Story") The setting of the story in a British colony was also perhaps a way of exploring racial issues in a way that would cause less controversy in America. Suyin loses her job in a Hong Kong hospital because her British superiors take exception to the fact that she is dating a white man, whom she is unable to marry because his estranged wife will not grant him a divorce. As was sometimes the case, European colonialism was made the whipping-boy for some of America's own failings. Imagine the furore that would have been unleashed had a similar film been made about a black or mixed-race woman doctor in a hospital in Alabama.

Besides racial issues, the film also raises questions of international politics, referring to both the Communist seizure of power in China and the outbreak of the Korean War. Han Suyin was a real person and a well-known author of the period; in reality she tended to support Mao's Communist regime, but here she is shown as firmly anti-Communist. This is not, however, primarily an "issue" movie about either racialism or politics, but rather a romance, a good example of what would have been known at the time as a "woman's picture". Such films, although mostly made by male directors, were mostly aimed at female audiences. They dealt with love and romance- often unhappy romance- from the woman's point of view, and had a strong female character in the leading role. The genre often provided roles for actresses older than the heroines of standard romances. Earlier examples were normally in monochrome, but by the fifties they generally, as here, used lush, sumptuous colour.

Although a Chinese or Eurasian actress would have been more convincing in the role, Jennifer Jones, does a very good job as Suyin. I found William Holden, as Mark, rather uncharismatic, but this does not matter much as Suyin is very much the dominant figure. She is screen much more than Mark, and the film examines her family and professional life much more than it does his. Although Jennifer was still strikingly beautiful, she was in her mid-thirties, rather older than most romantic heroines of films of this period. Holden was about the same age, unusually for the fifties when "boy-meets-girl" often meant "older man meets girl".

The film is not particularly profound, but is well-made with some attractive photography, particularly of Hong Kong itself, reflecting the growing trend in the fifties for shooting on location rather than on studio sets. Seldom can Hong Kong have looked so beautiful; the view from a hill overlooking the city takes on a special meaning, as this is where Suyin and Mark go for their romantic assignments. The overall mood is one of poignant, doomed romance, a mood heightened by the atmospheric photography and the musical score, including one of the most memorable movie themes ever written. 7/10
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Chinese Proverbs, knowing butterflies, fortunes told...nothing can stop fate!
moonspinner5528 June 2008
Han Suyin's autobiographical novel "A Many-Splendored Thing" becomes glossy, unconvincingly clean and luxurious romance set in Hong Kong, 1949, wherein a widowed female doctor of Chinese-English descent falls for an American correspondent stuck in a loveless marriage. John Patrick adapted Suyin's story, apparently turning her heartfelt remembrances into swooning romantic dross complete with poor dialogue exchanges (He: "I can't believe you're a doctor." .. She: "Too bad we don't have a scalpel, I could make a small incision."). Dark-haired, pale-skinned Jennifer Jones meets handsome, smiling William Holden at a party and immediately feigns indignance, as if widowed women bury their sexuality (or feel they must appear to) once a man takes an interest in them. Henry King directs the proceedings with a gentle touch, bringing it all to a misty-eyed flourish, yet Jones' character is never an embraceable one. Constantly referring to her heritage (and the fact she's "Eurasian"), this lady is forthright in all the wrong ways (she'd be more likely to turn off Holden's reporter rather than keep him around). Jones (who got an Oscar nomination) and Holden do create a loving rapport which becomes sweeter once Jennifer loosens up. This hard-working woman curiously puts a great deal of stock into superstitions (omens, Proverbs, butterflies), which seems out of step with such a no-nonsense lady; the sequence where she travels back home to Chunking to visit relatives is also odd (it doesn't take shape, it just appears as though she's running away). Holden performs in a low, easy key and glides through rather unperturbed (nothing ruffles this guy, but there's nothing to explain his devotion either; the man is obviously touched by this woman, but that doesn't tell us much about him). Alfred Newman's Oscar-winning music (and the memorable, Oscar-winning theme song by Sammy Fain and Paul Francis Webster) are lovely, and the locations are gorgeous, though the obvious studio shots are too tidy--even the hospital where Jones works seems overly opulent. A nice-enough weeper for soap fans, though one without the substance to entice a wider audience. **1/2 from ****
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Jennifer and Bill went up the Hill
wes-connors5 April 2009
In Hong Kong, "Eurasian" doctor Jennifer Jones (as Han Suyin) is unable to resist falling in love with clean-shaved newspaperman William Holden (as Mark Elliott). The movie is rather long and unconvincing; and, the much-ballyhooed star pairing lacks passion. Still, it won "Photoplay" awards for Best Picture, Actor, and Actress. The film's main strengths are its Sammy Fain/Paul Francis Webster theme song, and Leon Shamroy's beautiful Hong Kong cinematography. Decca recording stars "The Four Aces" filled the autumn of 1955 with their million-selling #1 hit version of the title song; and, coming in under three minutes, it's a superior way to experience "Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing".

****** Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing (8/18/55) Henry King ~ Jennifer Jones, William Holden, Isobel Elsom
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Do not wake a sleeping tiger."
brogmiller15 October 2021
Eurasian physician Rosalie Chou was an extremely interesting woman who wrote under the name of Han Suyin. Apparently she sold the rights to her autobiographical 'A many-splendored thing' so as to pay for her adopted daughter to receive treatment in England for pulmonary thrombosis. Unsurprisingly she distanced herself from the film.

This adaptation by John Patrick has here been given the full Twentieth Century Fox treatment by its 'A' team. Sensitive direction by Henry King, stunning cinematography by 'the cameraman's cameraman' Leon Shamroy, seamless editing by William Reynolds and a lush score by Alfred Newman.

The English correspondent with whom Suyin has an ill-fated romance has become an American, no surprise there, and is played by William Holden whilst Suyin is portrayed by Jennifer Jones. Good support from Torin Thatcher, Isobel Elsom and Murray Matheson as the resident 'colonials'.

It is supremely ironic that one of the great love stories is here played out by two actors whose relations off set were far from cordial to say the least. Their consummate professionalism has enabled them to rise above this antipathy and Miss Jones gives one of her very best performances. Mr. Holden of course has the unbeatable combination of masculinity and sensitivity. One genuinely cares what happens to their characters and they are aided immeasurably by the glorious theme music derived by Sammy Fain from Puccini's 'Un bel di......'

The film has naturally been dismissed by the flint-hearted as overly sentimental but it was made at a time when sentimentality was not a dirty word. It is designed to appeal to the emotions and does so in spades.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Tear-Jerker Romance! Holden at his Peak!
lawrence_elliott10 December 2007
This film always hits me hard emotionally at the end. Though the issues of the film - interracial romance and adultery - were controversial at the time, this film goes way beyond those narrow parameters and instead penetrates into ground-breaking novelty and trail-blazing uniqueness. Here we have a true love story, as written by the woman involved in this love affair, told in a brilliant aggressive style that extols the virtues and glory of mad passionate love. I "love" this endorsement of the only emotion that makes life truly worth living. Jennifer Jones is full of grace and William Holden is simply magnificent in his role as a reporter. A wonderful film that only people who have been in this kind of love can really appreciate and understand. And for those who haven't yet been in love, even just the hope that one day lightning can strike for you makes life worth living - because love is worth having even if but for a short time - even if you lose - because love is the "stuff" - the essence - of life. This film works for me. A warmly felt experience!
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Love is a Many-Splendored Thing was a nice true-life romance starring William Holden and Jennifer Jones
tavm27 January 2021
Just watched this movie with my mom. She had seen this before and remembered many scenes and liked it as much as previously. I myself like the romance between William Holden and Jennifer Jones who's not bad playing a Eurasian even though it wouldn't be politically correct for a Caucasian to play such a role today. And, yes, that title song plays as the score quite a bit though only as an instrumental until the end. And knowing this was based on a true story also made this an intriguing drama. So on that note, Mom and me recommend Love is a Many-Splendored Thing.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
THE big date movie for 1956....didn't work for me,sadly...................
ianlouisiana11 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
One summer night in 1956 it was a straight choice between this and "The Man With The Golden Arm".Frank Sinatra in a controversial junkie movie with a cool Elmer Bernstein score and Shorty Rogers as a band - leader. Did I want to see William Holden and Jennifer Jones in a schmaltzy love story with a soppy theme song that was all over the radio?You couldn't escape from it.All the record shops in Brighton were playing it,even Woolworth's own label,"Embassy",were selling out of copies.My girl - friend thought Sinatra was "square" and "Shorty who?" was her only comment when I mentioned the music,so "Love is a many splendurd thing" it was then. She sobbed throughout and clung onto my hand - which was a plus.I smoked my "Olivier"(nothing pretentious then!) right up to the corked tip before tucking into the recently off- ration Cadbury's bar until I felt slightly nauseous. Up on the screen Jennifer Jones was totally unconvincing as a Eurasian doctor in love with gruff,cynical William Holden,American Newshound. The more Miss Jones mentioned the fact that she was Eurasian the less I believed her - for a start her eyes seemed to have changed shape from time to time and she seemed to have trouble talking in Chinese on the few occasions she attempted to do so.She was too matronly to be sexy,too girlish to be a doctor.This was not helped by the fact that the Chinese actor who played her colleague read his lines as if they were the instructions for a particularly complicated item of electronic equipment. Whenever Mr Holden was supposed to be happy and gay(Ah,those were the days when a chap could be gay without looking over his shoulder)he merely succeeded in looking marginally less grumpy than usual. And the bit on the high and windy hill?Well,my girlfriend was almost beyond comfort by then,the heavenly choir soaring into space on the back of that all - too - familiar tune.I found an old handkerchief wrapped round a half - empty packet of "Spangles" in my pocket and handed it to her in a gesture she mistook for being one of eternal devotion when all I wanted to do was get her cleaned up for the walk to the bus station. As we walked hand in hand down a West Street blisfully free of drunks,dopers,cardboard city dwellers and "Big Issue" salespeople she began to sing "Love is a many splendoured thing" in a soft,sweet voice and I realised,perhaps rather belatedly,that we were not ideally suited.
14 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Most Sentimental Film Ever Made
wildhoney282817 April 2001
Warning: Spoilers
I first saw this film in the mid 60's when I was a teenager, and it moved me so much, in fact the end scene where Han Suyin hears of Mark's death, and then rushes to the hill in disbelief, where you then hear Mark's voice saying "Give Me Your Hand", and then the image of him disappears, the butterfly with it's superstitious meaning, the music, the shattered emotions of Love of Han Suyin, just left me sobbing my heart out. I was outwardly crying bitterly, my mother and sister looked up and were shocked at my reaction. I just left the room to be on my own. Fortunately I do not react like that any more BUT I always cry at the end. I love everything about the film, the music mostly, the costumes of Han Suyin, and location. The beauty of Jennifer Jones and the handsome William Holden, they were both at their best. I have the VHS and DVD of this wonderful movie. I also have two versions of the Music & Lyrics by Arthur Newman and Sammy Fain. I also have the book A Many Splendored Thing by Han Suyin. I recommend this film 100%
62 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"If we didn't believe the unbelievable, what would happen to faith?"
classicsoncall11 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I don't doubt that this would have been a romantic hit during the era it came out in, but today it seems hardly credible to this viewer. I say that primarily because the character of Dr. Han Suyin (Jennifer Jones) discards her inhibitions about pursuing a romance with Mark Elliott (William Holden) much too easily. All the roadblocks she faces at the outset, the fact that she's a widow who was devoted to her husband, the responsibility and joy she finds in her work, and the cultural taboos that attach to a woman of mixed heritage seeing an American man, well, those were all strong inducements against getting involved with a married man in the first place. And yet all that apprehension simply melted away when Elliott first declared that he 'thought he loved her'. There's also the question of Ms. Jones casting, though I'm not as bothered by that as much as the politically correct landscape of present day would suggest. It's just that she didn't look half Chinese in the least, so her constant referrals to her Eurasian heritage were more of a distraction than necessary for the story. And so it was meant to be a tear jerker when news of her husband's passing occurred while on assignment during the Korean War, and it probably had it's intended effect for movie-goers of the time, but I found myself not as moved by Elliott's death as I thought I should have been given the tone of the story.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"We shall now have tea and speak of absurdities."
EUyeshima30 March 2009
That line never fails to make me laugh when I hear it within the context of an intentionally dramatic scene in this atmospheric 1955 romantic sudser that was a big hit in its day thanks to the familiar Sammy Fain theme song. At the same time, the somewhat patronizing Orientalism of that line represents much of the arm's-length approach the film has in reflecting U.S. attitude toward China in the 1950's. Viewed by today's standards, the result feels emotionally simplistic like a more thoughtful Harlequin romance novel, even though the production values are first-rate. However, the bigger problem is the unfortunate lack of chemistry between the two leads, Jennifer Jones and William Holden. Their characters' romance never quite resonates, and the pacing is not helped by Henry King's lugubrious direction.

Set against the backdrop of the 1949 Communist Revolution, Han Suyin, a Eurasian doctor in Hong Kong falls for Mark Elliott, a married war correspondent. The film focuses on their somewhat illicit love story at a time when a relationship between a half-Chinese, half-European woman and an American was considered as forbidden as the resulting adultery. The racism and culture clashes between East and West take up much of the storyline with the lovers surrounded by English colonialists thriving on the class distinctions left over from the Victorian era, and by her equally traditional Chinese relatives who shun the imprint being left by the Europeans. The film benefits immensely from the use of actual Hong Kong locations with the cinematography by Leon Shamroy and Charles G. Clark providing a textbook example of how to create the right atmosphere given the exotic locations.

Because of her Svengali-like relationship and eventual marriage to mega-producer David O. Selznick ("Gone with the Wind"), Jones had an interesting array of roles during her career. She can be appealing in the right role ("Portrait of Jennie", "Beat the Devil"), but she never quite brings this conflicted character to life. Burdened with trying to look and act Chinese, she comes across as stiff and actressy, although she improves as the story moves along. As Mark, Holden is wasted in a relatively colorless role given that he was at his career peak at the time, and despite his expressions of enduring love, he can't seem to create sparks with Jones like he did with Audrey Hepburn or Grace Kelly. Even with all its flaws, the movie is still worthwhile to see for its lush production and for the surprisingly robust set of extras on the 2003 DVD with a commentary track provided by film historian Sylvia Stoddard, UCLA film scholar John Burlingame, and cinematographer Michael Lonzo. Stoddard and Burlingame fill in a lot of the interesting details on the life of the real Han Suyin, while Lonzo's comments are limited to the technical details of the CinemaScope production.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A love story for adults...
angilee-110 September 2001
I just watched this film for the first time as an adult. I still have tears in my eyes. I wish they made movies like this now, without all the crass "sex stuff", that seems to be required all too often. Obviously, Jennifer Jones and William Holden (perfect casting) have great passion, but they have true to the mark tenderness. My favorite line is "The greatest strength is gentleness", and William Holden portrays an intelligent, gentleman. He and Jones looked fantastic in their swimsuits, and when she asked him to bring her a cigarrette behind the rocks, I thought for sure they were going to have a torrid make out scene. (Or at least torrid by 1955 standards.) But no, she makes him wait! Also, a woman physician, who is Eurasian, was quite an idea back then. This movie was way ahead of it's time in many respects. I intend to get it on DVD, so it will last forever, just like their love!
49 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I guarantee one thing: the song won't come off your mind easily...
ElMaruecan822 July 2019
He's American. She's Eurasian. He's married. She's a widow. He's a correspondent, a man asked to watch and tell. She's a doctor, a woman asked to care and cure. He's a universalist though he's proud of his American heritage and she's not a Communist though she values her Chinese side. What else? Well, the 'he' and 'she' meet in Hong-Kong in 1949 and if you expect their differences to act like obstacles, then you haven't watched many romances in your life... or you simply didn't pay much attention to the title, if it doesn't set the tone, I don't know what it does.

I'll say about Henry King's "Love is a Many-Splendored Thing" what I said about Clint Eastwood's "The Rookie", this is the kind of film that knows what to deliver to audiences that know what to expect. Remarkable in its conventionality, nothing can put the romance off the trail, nor its ambition to paint a vivid and exquisite portrait of a love that transcends the frontiers and promotes international understanding between Dr. Han Suyin, a Chinese-British woman played by Jennifer Jones and Mark Elliott, the American Joe portrayed by the so dependable William Holden, at the top of his sexiness in 1955.

There is even a moment where the two lovers have a romantic escapade in a beach and one might feel the tide of thoughts leading him toward "From Here to Eternity", but "Love is a Many-Splendored Thing" swims in far different waters, not wasting anything for the sordid or the controversial, this is love in its purest and most civilized form, despite its efforts to paint a clash of civilizations or an internal conflict in the heart of Suyin. It never goes beyond the state of mildly expressed disagreements or "should I? should I not?" dilemmas, apart from that, Suyin loves Mark and he loves Suyin, what more do you need?

The city of Hong Kong offers the touch of exoticness without which the film would have lacked its savor, we see a hospital where Suyin's dedication is more than appreciated, her Chinese side emphasizes the devotion to her people, but her British side makes her a subject of interest or concern for the local Western citizens and a few gossipers. Suyin is literally speaking a woman of the world, two feet in worlds that couldn't have been more distinct, culturally and politically. However, when she catches the eye of handsome correspondent Mar Elliott, neither sides matter, he's sensitive to her beauty, to her own sensitivity, and never cares much about her origins.

Mark is so enamored that the only bit of adversity he can be responsible of is his status as a married man, much more to a woman who refuses to free him. Meanwhile, Suyin must deal with the obligations, the traditions, the reputation and her status as a foreigner, but while these elements are often mentioned, the film doesn't insist too much on them even when they're pointed out as threats. The story is dictated to us in a way that never distracts us from the romance and its ever-present score, last time I felt such an ubiquitous theme, it was "Lara's" in "Doctor Zhivago". The music, from Alfred Newman, is so present that I was happy it could provide lyrics at the end.

Overall, I must applaud the daringness with which King uses a material that could come off as a corny and yet employ two talented actors who make the chemistry believable. Jones is such a delight to watch and to see her smile and have her girlish side awakened (forget about Chinese or British side) when she's out of breath after climbing up that tree or giggling it like a schoolgirl after receiving a letter, and seeing Holden play the game, expose his beautiful torso, feigning amusement with the Chinese superstitions is the kind of delights you expect from these great Cinemascope movies and "Love" (to call it that way) never disappoints although it never surprises.

The film has local colors rather than colorfulness, too much elaborate dialogue to be believable and is as conventional in its narrative as it is busy with convention within the narrative, so maybe in its obsession to play in the safe side, it forgets to spice up its plot at the end and to allow the characters to bloom from the range of civilized interactions that kept the flame but never let the feelings exploded, the film lacked the burning passion so to speak.

And I wouldn't go as far as saying that Jennifer Jones was miscast, she could pass as Eurasian after all, but maybe something needed to make them a mismatched couple, I'm too much a fan of Holden to see it differently but maybe another actor might have emphasized the "tortured" aspect of that relationship, he'd play the same playboy role in another Best picture nominee of that year "Picnic" but I think Holden I one of these actors who got better with age. Jones was perhaps the first reason to enjoy the film, with the lovely sight of Hong Kong and maybe -maybe- that "Love is a Many-Splendored Thing" song, I guarantee you one thing, it won't come off your mind easily.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sleeping Tigers
richardchatten7 February 2020
A Cold War version of 'Madame Butterfly' beautifully yet unobtrusively photographed by Leon Shamroy in CinemaScope & DeLuxe Color with location work in Hong Kong.

Author Hun Suyin didn't even bother to watch this film of her book, but Jennifer Jones is usually touching to watch and makes one of Hollywood's less risible attempts by a big star to play Asian (or as she would have corrected you, 'Eurasian'), and the Academy Award the film received for costume design attested that she looked good in a quipao.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It has changed so much!
mago194212 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
After many, many years I saw again this beautiful love story, thinking about how would I, half a century after, react to a film which made so many girls cry and sigh at that time, when I was just an male adolescent trying to understand women's behaviors, in a small city in Brazil.

This time, however, what caught my attention in the film was something very different, namely the insistence with which the physician Dr. Han Suyin (Jennifer Jones) makes clear to the journalist Mark Elliott (William Holden) her special ethically condition as an Eurasian. In fact, she is constantly putting emphasis on this point in their relationship, repeating she is willing to assume her love for him and carry it on in a "occidental way", provided that, by doing so, she is not betraying her Chinese side. Its seems to the spectator that Suyin is eagerly making efforts to establish a very subtle conciliation between those two unstable and opposite aspects of her culture, for they will immediately engage in overt conflict in her mind at a minimum failure in her attempts to control them.

Therefore, Suyin's attitudes always leave poor Elliott – a determined, brave and extremely practical man – anxious and perplexed, without knowing how much importance to give to her words. For him, whose love for her is plain and simple, the situation is totally clear: if we love each other, let us make a couple and begin immediately a life together. "Not so fast", is what she seems, verbally and non-verbally, to answer him all the time.

In fact, Suyin's Chinese portion would never allow her such a level of pragmatism. And, as she goes on and on reinforcing this much aimed equilibrium between those two worlds inside herself, she also frequently signals to him that also a very peculiar trait of Chinese culture is deeply rooted in her mind, namely the constant "raids" on the real world by invisible beings from an spiritual or non-physical world. For Suyin is always alerting Elliott about how dangerous is life, not because of any objective and concrete threat (as would be the perpetuation of the English colonialism or the eminence of a Japanese invasion), but due to the threats of plenty of cruel and harmful gods and other mystical and mythical beings over the poor, fearful and vulnerable human beings.

In fact, it looks like a whole bunch of Chinese deities are permanently on the watch to make people's life totally miserable. Because of that, mothers must dress their precious male babies in girls clothes, so that they are not taken away by jealous gods; everyone should always be ready to make loud noises to send the clouds away, in order to avoid their covering the sight of the moon; peasants are advised that they should shout loudly "The rice is bad! The rice is bad!" to protect their crops from being stolen by deities; and, in a funeral, it is recommended that the dead's family be isolated from the other people by curtains, so that the gods don't take advantage of their sorrow and fragility.

In other words, Suyin introduces us to a culture in which the supernatural has a real existence, as if a rather disturbing pantheon of malign and sadistic gods are always on the verge of negatively interfering with the most banal acts in anyone's daily life.

As the story takes place in Hong Kong in 1949, it should be clear that China really was, at that time, almost a semi-feudal society, while the country from which Elliott had come from was not yet dominated by the fierce capitalism that, launched by the USA after the first oil shock in 1973, took charge of the whole world. Therefore, at least in one aspect, both sides of Suyin's Eurasian personality were still much more innocent than they would be today.

A lot of History came into being since those old days. As to China, the main fact is that, after several phases of a communist regime, the country finally reached, in the last two decades, the condition of a very aggressive economy much more properly described as State capitalism. And, what happened to that old spirituality that so much enthralled Suyin in Hong Kong, in 1949, and with which she used to impress so much an impassioned Elliott, under that tree on the hill behind the hospital? It is gone, completely gone! In brief, if that story took place today, Elliott would not find it necessary to go to China to propose to Suyin in the presence of the Third Uncle and her entire family. In fact, both men would now be incomparably closer to one another, in their huge pragmatism, talking business as usual!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
WHO CAN ARGUE LOVE?
Richie-67-48585214 December 2019
First off the words to the song Love is a many splendored thing are beautiful and demand respect. For that alone the movie is worth seeing as it to hear the theme as it comes on in the background often. As to the love affair, I have seen better but for its time it probably had people bawling their eyes out as they left the theater. There was no chemistry between the two leads but the viewers imagination fills it in. How? Its a chance to fantasize about your love life past, present or future and then the movie makes perfect sense. Worthy to note that the star of the picture is really LOVE. Furthermore, how gentle love is as it makes its humble and shy appearance, performs beyond words, speaking in emotions and heart-driven dynamics only to at some point cut its visit short. Why? We don't know but while it is here and visiting or if you are expecting it or perhaps you had it... one can only say thank you when it comes to this subject. Sadly today and at times here and there, people mistake lust for it or ruin love with conditions. The thing is that it stands on its own needing nothing added to it or taken from it except for one small thing: You wish it would last an eternity.....
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"A Great Many Mistakes Are Made In the Name of Loneliness"
twanurit30 May 2004
Those prophetic words were spoken by William Holden (as a war reporter) to the beauteous Jennifer Jones (as a Eurasian doctor), explaining his failing marriage on the beach. They start an affair, despite huge odds of adultery and racial issues. In Hollywood of the 1950s, interracial romance was allowed but only with dire consequences at the end. Beautiful Hong Kong scenery (although some beach scenes look studio-bound), a famous title tune, poetic script, lovely background music (by Alfred Newman), great costumes, outstanding performances, especially Jones (directed here by Henry King, who also did "The Song of Bernadette - 1943, an Oscar for Jones) still make this a world-class romance weeper.
54 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Pleasant Film That Could Use More Passion
atlasmb11 June 2017
The central theme of this film (based on a true story) is that true love is strong enough to overcome all obstacles. The obstacle in this case is prejudice against those from other cultures. William Holden and Jennifer Jones play the American man and the Eurasian woman who meet in Hong Kong and find love despite the taboos they dare to challenge.

The primary problem with this premise is that Jones, by appearance, is not convincingly and consistently Eurasian. She overcomes some of this by her manner and speech.

As a fan of Holden, I cannot ignore a comparison with "Picnic", also released in 1955.

In both films, Holden is the outsider--a rebellious figure viewed with suspicion, a flaunter of community standards. But in "Picnic", Holden's character must struggle to overcome his own doubts, making the struggle more meaningful and central to his character's development.

In both films, there is a musical theme that is strong. In "Picnic", the theme is better used, an actual part of the action that links the two lovers together (through dance).

In "Picnic", the love scenes are electric, charged with passion and a hunger for what might be called salvation. In "Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing", the kisses are sometimes passionate, sometimes lukewarm, perhaps due to the emotional distance between the two stars, well documented.

Though the love story in "Love Is A Many-Splendored Thing" can feel subordinate to the larger story of cultural differences, which is undeniably interesting, in "Picnic" the love story is what every element revolves around.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing Script
DKosty12322 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I am a fan of William Holden and this starring film at this time should have been better. Despite all the great scenery in Hong Kong, the script lets this one down. No wonder the theme song is much more famous than the film.

Holden is a journalist and he meets a Female Doctor who has been widowed. Holden's wife who we never meet does not want to let him go, even though she has not seen him in 6 years. Such is the confusion of this plot, and the Doctor falls in love and carries a flame for this guy throughout. What is missing for everybody here is a back story.

The ending is so predictable that I guessed it about the first 10 minutes. The scenery is the neat stuff here. The car Holden drives around is not the usual model. There is a CAT Vehicle at one point.

Oh, if this really had a story, but it tries to wet 3 hankies without really drawing the viewer into anything except feeling how odd this relationship is. I got out the hankie when I realized how good this movie could have been, but it just does not get anywhere near where it should be.

Sometimes the tree at the top of the hill needs to get cut down. I had the urge to rent a chain saw for the last scenes and say "enough already." The song Love is a Many Splendored Thing" is the only claim to long term fame this one has.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This is really worth watching
michaelreid52 February 2008
This film immediately catches the eye, with the atmospheric aerial views of a very pretty Hong Hong. Filmed in those rich colours of 1950 films which modern blockbusters never seem to capture. Probably a sign of those times, because this is not a high powered, seen it all before film, full of havoc and violence. The havoc and violence are there though, in the backdrop, with thousands of refugees trying to get out of China This is a very moving and compelling story, full of hope and love in a tragic time, in recent history. The story of two people from different cultures falling in love. And the build up to them trying to overcome this is at the heart of this very fine and moving film.
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wooden and unengaging
amsaltcoats9 July 2022
I had heard a lot about this film and was delighted to find it on Talking Pictures TV.

I was disappointed.

Jennifer Jones is usually good and although she is watchable here, her delivery is oddly stilted and declamatory. The film has attractive locations and is an interesting picture of life at that but as a love story it fails to convince because the leads have absolutely zero chemistry.

To me the film is flat and lacks fizz and, for me, is not worth watching again.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The World of Suzie Wrong!
brefane13 March 2017
Dated, pointless and dull with one particularly fatal flaw; the leads have no chemistry. Jennifer Jones and William Holden are usually attractive and appealing, but they have no characters to play and their scenes together are dull, awkward and unpersuasive. The romance never ignites despite the ever present title tune. The dialog is too explanatory, the word Eurasian is used as insistently as the theme song and the supporting characters are waxworks. Jones and Holden keep going around and around the issue of their relationship with a great deal of running up to the hilltop and looking across the harbor. Filmed on location, the setting never really shapes or has any real effect on the story itself. Shockingly this banal film was nominated for 8 Oscars including Best Picture with film's score and song both winning. Films like this are made to promote understanding, but Love Is a Many-Splendored Thing is more likely to promote a good night's sleep.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed