The Snow Creature (1954) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
64 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
surpassed my low-expectations
KDWms24 March 2003
I suppose you should approach this stuff with an open mind, but I have difficulty doing that. Those words written, my expectations for this were, quite frankly, pretty low. I knew that it was a 1954, low-budget production. Therefore, I was prepared to tolerate the cheap old costumes and over-abundance of no-action dialogue. I wanted to subject myself to this fillage of time. Sure, some of the responses were totally unrealistic. But, looking past all the negatives, I still found some pros that, in my opinion, offset the anticipated cons. Some of that dialogue, to me, actually represented a try. Maybe I give it a (barely) passing grade because even this simpleton could follow the extremely UNcomplex plot: Scientist captures living snow creature in Himalayas and is able to return it to LA, where it escapes. Perhaps I would feel ripped off if I spent too much money to purchase a tape of this movie. But having seen it on satellite TV - which I think of as a more-INdirect flow of my dollars - my concern was mostly for my time, which I did not find totally wasted.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Snow Creature or Bureaucratic Beast
Hitchcoc27 April 2006
Some of the Himalayan scenes are interesting. There is a conflict as to who is running the show. It's typical of Westerners to try to run roughshod over their "inferiors." Anyway, the Yeti is out there and if we bring him (or her) back, we can make a bundle. Everything works out pretty well and they order his refrigerated box. The problem is the customs guys don't know whether he's human or not. In most respects he is. He lives in a family setting. He has tools. He walks upright and is built pretty much like most homo sapiens. What are his rights? Nobody says anything about just barging into his domain and killing off his family. So, like every good monster movie (or bad one), the "guy" gets loose in the city and wastes a couple of people. What should he do? He's trying to survive. While there are issues that keep this interesting, it doesn't sustain itself very well. There are unanswered questions that are forgotten as soon as the Yeti escapes from his box. A film with some courage might have gone beyond what it does, but money or talent got in the way. The monster looks pretty much like a man with a beard (we never get a good look at him in daylight). Pretty poor with a few perks.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Snow Way I'll Ever Watch This Again
stepstonefilms2 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Snow creature started off looking like it might be alright, it was obviously low budget, but had some not bad acting, some good sets and a not too bad score. Then the so called "Snow Creature" makes an appearance, looking more like the rabbit from Donnie Darko, luckily we don't see that often. The film still manages to be entertaining, until we start seeing the creature more often, then it begins to get annoying, as the same shot of the creature emerging from the shadows and then immediately disappearing back into the darkness is re-used over and over countless times. Then it gets even worse once they capture the creature. Then, somehow, it manages to get worse, as they decide to take the creature back to America in a large fridge that they constructed especially for it. Once they get to U.S. the obvious happens and the creature escapes and goes for a wander. Then that same shot of the creature going in and out of the shadows comes back with a vengeance. Good God!!!!

Overall I could'nt possibly recommend the film. The first 35 minutes or so is watchable-ish, but it falls apart quickly and never manages to recover. 3/10.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Abominable is an accurate description.
reptilicus2 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
W. Lee Wilder, older and far less talented brother of Billy Wilder; still he did make some memorable contributions to the b-movie genre. Has anyone who has seen KILLERS FROM SPACE ever forgotten it? Ditto PHANTOM FROM SPACE with its invisible alien? He even tackled to Abominable Snowman sub genre, alas with predictable results. This time the Yeti kidnaps the wife of a native guide and he (Teru Shimada) and his fellow Sherpas order the expedition leader (Leslie Dennison) to track the creature . . . or else. This would be a great plot device but it is not long before everyone forgets the main reason they are way up on the mountains and turns their attention to capturing the Yeti alive!

This Yeti is a tall skinny fellow whose "fur" looks like mismatched fur coats sewn together rather hastily. He is even a family man, we get a brief look at his mate and young child (so why did he kidnap the woman? To use her as a nanny perhaps?).

Okay this would be a pretty dull movie if the Yeti was not captured. Oh wait! This IS a pretty dull movie! Um . . . it would be an even duller movie if the Yeti were not captured, is that better? And of course he has to escape . . . I mean who wants to spend the second half of the movie watching him in a cage? He gets away because his entry into the U S of A is held up while Customs officials (get this!) determine his immigration status! Which means when he escapes the cops start hunting him because A. he is a dangerous monster on the loose and B. he is an illegal immigrant!

Mr. Wilder stretched his low budget by repeating the shot of the Snowman walking up a dark street 3 times. There are also seemingly endless shots of policemen running all over the place while searching for him.

KILLERS FROM SPACE is a lot more fun than SNOW CREATURE, hey don't take my word for it, see them both and then decide for yourself.

Oh and if you were wondering whatever happened to Myles Wilder who wrote the scripts for many of W. Lee's movies; he later went on to write scripts for Saturday morning cartoon shows like "Funky Phantom" and "Hong Kong Phooey".
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Poor snowman costume sinks this one.
youroldpaljim20 October 2001
This film really isn't all that bad. The photography is moody and atmospheric. The music is sometimes quite good. Director W.Lee Wilder occasionally shows some visual flair. The cast is at worst adequate. The snowman is another story. It it simply a very tall man wrapped in what looks like rabbit fur. Granted, director W. Lee Wilder tries to keep the snowman hidden in the shadows most of the time. But when he is seen full view it looks amazingly unconvincing. Had this film not employed such a poor snowman costume, it probably would have been regarded as a slightly better than average low budget early fifties monster picture.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Attack of the Poodle Man!
joebridge12 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Watch this movie closely (if you dare), and you will see certain of the same fairly long sequences repeated only a few minutes apart (such as when they are walking up the mountain and when they are searching the city sewers near the end), not including the ridiculous loop of the snow creature of which various short segments play now and then, both in forward and reverse, from start to finish (amazing how well he can walk backwards). Seriously, near the end, it is so awkward when you see random bits of the loop right close together which literally made a friend and I groan out of discomfort, almost as if the editor was trying to drive the viewer mad, especially when it sometimes freezes for a moment as if the projector just stopped, before the next scene begins.

The snow creature looks much like a man/poodle hybrid! It's true!

There are some really horrible elements of this movie, which are a mix of incoherence and that of the ludicrous:

1. I'm not quite sure what happens when they capture the snow creature. It seems he is trying to bring down the cave ceiling to kill the intruders, but his female and baby snow creature are killed instead and he knocks HIMSELF out to add insult to injury! (Or maybe it was some sort of suicidal act?) If he already had a female, then why did he kidnap the woman, and why did they give up the search for her so quickly?

2. The part where an inspector from the US Customs Service wants to know if the creature is a man or a beast after they arrive is ludicrous, and jaw-droppingly silly. That part alone makes the movie a joke.

3. I may be wrong on this, but why would the sewers be so much cooler, (even cold) for the snow creature to prefer being down there? Wouldn't they be a lot warmer? I know in most other movies, even if it is cold in the city, you see steam rising from the manholes. I am nitpicking perhaps, but I CAN see him hiding down there just because it is cave-like.

All of the ridiculous technical points, even as to why a botanist is freezing in heaps of snow and strong winds (maybe it was solely for the botanist-becomes-Yeti-hunter plot twist) and the shooting of the "radio machine" (and the exchanging of the booze and the radio in their respective containers to hide the damaged radio for fixing later) make this just a bit "too much" to enjoy.

1/10. I mean, they have got to be kidding. Like my friend's father used to say, "I know a poodle when I see one!"
19 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You put your left leg in, you put your left leg out, in , out, shake it all about...
junk-monkey7 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The first part of this movie starts off like a "Wonderful World of Nature" type travelogue then quickly descends into awfulness.

A plant-hunting expedition sets out to explore the Himalayas. After trekking for two gruelling, tedious days they set up base camp. That night the head guide's wife is taken from his home village by a Yeti. Villagers cover the ground the expedition took two days to cover that same night - in the dark. Anyone think these scientists hired the wrong guides? The head guide takes the white scientists' guns and they trek endlessly around the mountains, past the same bunches of rocks time and time again. Yep - they hired the wrong guy. Eventually they find a cave. Inside they find a huge Muppet - sorry, Yeti family. The male Yeti, suddenly surprised in his own home by gun wielding Sherpas, decides to remodel the cave and causes a rockfall which knocks him unconscious and kills his mate and child. In the confusion the white guys get the guns back and, now that the natural order is restored, force the 'natives' to abandon the search for the Guide's wife (who, for all they know is somewhere in the cave, they just found her necklace after all) and cart the drugged Yeti back to Civilisation "Where he belongs." Back in town the scientists decide not to press charges against the Sherpas (Thank you, B'wana! Me glad not to be in gaol for trying to rescue my wife) and are allowed to take the Yeti away without even filling out any forms. Hello white people, please abuse our countrymen, abandon our women to die on mountainsides, and steal our national treasures. It's a pleasure to be abused by you, thank you. Do come again. Bring tanks next time.

The Yeti is shipped to LA via a long series of stock shots.

The head scientist arrives and is reunited with his wife, then gets into a dispute with the local immigration people about whether the Yeti is a man or an animal. As they debate the matter in a series of master-shots the Yeti escapes. The police are soon on the scene in the shape of a Lt. Dunbar an man who's screen presence is enhanced by the actor having an uncanny ability that enables him to actually upstage himself! Several times he needlessly turns his back to the audience before delivering lines and then occasionally, as a bonus, waits for other people to get between him and the camera before speaking. Maybe he was expecting there to be other takes - everything is shot in one wide take there are no other angles in any scene, or maybe he realised he was in a real stinker and was trying to hide, either way it is a genius performance.

The police search for the escaped Snow Man Beast Muppet thing using a variety of stock shots, sequences lifted from other movies, and sticking three push pins into the smallest map of L.A the producers could find.

All to no avail, the Yeti appears to be moving round the city with impunity. How is he getting about? Our scientist looks out of the window and sees a street sweeper sweeping garbage into a drain. Hmmmm. He wonders, Didn't he remember something about all rampaging monsters due to be let loose in the LA area being issued with maps of the storm drains a while back? The police wander around the storm drains (or to be more precise our leads and three extras in uniforms, wander around three or four yards of storm drain shot from at least, oh I'd say - two different angles). Endlessly they wander up and down the same three bits of drain hoping the audience don't notice because it is so dark. Suddenly they trap the Muppet in a net - and shoot it dead.

Stupid denouement - The End

This film was made so cheaply it hurts. The Mountain sequences alternate long tedious climbing sequences (shot without sound) followed by night-time sequences, for the most part in small tents, in which the story, such as it is, is progressed. The shots of the Snow beast looming into the camera and then retreating are repeated so often, and towards the end, so randomly, that it looks like the thing is doing the Hokey-Pokey. The same alley way is shot from the same angle over and over again and is the setting for the best, weird shot of the whole thing. A slow pan left to right of the empty alley, a scream, the camera stops and pans BACK across the still empty alley before revealing an altercation in a doorway we've never seen before.

On the positive side it is only 71 minutes long.
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shambling Shag Rug Attacks!! :=8O
MooCowMo9 June 2000
Silly, preposterous cheapie from Billy Wilder's incowpetant kid brother, W. Lee Wilder("Killers from Space", "Phantom from Space", "Manfish"). A churlish failed botanist & a drunk photographer lead a group of Japanese actors trying to pass as Tibetans into some poorly designed fake Himalayan sets; a tall shaggy fellow steals one of the "Sherpas" wives, and a merry chase ensues with the "legendary Yeti" to retrieve the wife & bring the Big Hairy Guy back to the States. Once in Los Angeles a debate brews over wether the walking rug is a human monster or mutant DuPont Stainmaster, and therefore cargo. The carpet then escapes, haunts the sewers of L.A., and is given the Final Treatment by the cops. Slow, stodgy, and dumb as a box of Himalayan rocks, this early ABSM(Abominable Snowman)stinker features the single worst snowman costume ever - it's obviously a huge shaggy rug, with a square hole cut out of the face so the "actor" stuffed inside can see/breathe. The poor unfortunate inside can barely moove around, and we even get to see him/her slip on the icy rocks that are supposed to pass for the Himalayans. Wilder's threadbare technique of using the same shots and scenes over and over again to shave moolah off the the film's production costs serve as further hilarity - one shot, of the "snowman" stepping out of the shadows, is shown and reversed over and over and over, some 20 or 30 times. Like a brief glimpse into future Coleman Francis moovies, actors spend much of the non-Himalayan time smoking and/or drinking coffee. You will remember Paul Langton, who plays Botanist Frank Parrish, from such stinkers as "IT:The Terror from Beyond Space", "The Cosmic Man", and "Invisible Invaders", although he may best be remembered for 1957's "The Incredible Shrinking Man", which was actually a pretty good flick. Lock Martin("Invaders from Mars", "The Day the Earth Stood Still", "The Incredible Shrinking Man") reportedly was the poor soul stuffed inside the shaggy rug, a very tall actor known as 50's tv host "The Gentle Giant" and for playing Gort, the robot in "The Day the Earth Stood Still" - kind of a Richard Kiel of the 50's. As for "Snow Creature", well its typical W. Lee Wilder, and that means slow, cheap, and dumb. The MooCow suggests viewing the W. Lee Wilder trilogy ("Snow Beast", "Killers from Space", "Phantom from Space")with yer stinky moovie buddies, and let the silliness ensue. ;=8)
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I don't know how he did it YETI did.
sol121827 January 2005
***SPOILERS*** Outrageously campy film about the "Yeti" or "Abominable Snowman" of the Himilayias with the creature looking like a giant Gabby Hayes or Jed Clampet of the "Beverly Hillbillies". The creature goes around in a tight fur-lined jumpsuit tip toeing through the tulips as if trying not to wake up anyone in the movie or in the audience who may have fallen asleep watching. The creature was found by Dr. Frank Parrish's, Paul Langton, expedition that began in the town of Sherka at the foot of the mighty Himilayian Mountains.

Dr. Perrish was going up the snow capped mountains to study plants and flowers, Dr. Parrish is a botanist, only to have his expedition taken over by a mutiny lead by his Sherka guide Subra, Teru Shimada, who's woman was kidnapped by a local Yeti in order to get her back. This leads to the expedition finding a cave high up on the mountain range where the Yeti and his family lives.

Finding himself surrounded the Yeti starts a violent cave-in by pulling rocks out of their place killing his mate and offspring and knocking himself out . The Yeti ends up being captured by Dr. Parrish and his Sherka mountain climbers; and who said that Yati's are supposed to be smart.

Brought back some 10,000 miles to L.A the local authorities are more interested in the Yeti's immigration status then it's value to science. As their bickering with Dr. Parrish it escapes from an ice-box that it was caged in and goes out killing people on the streets of L.A. You would think that such a major find on Dr. Parrish's part would draw the attention of the entire scientific and anthropological world but in the movie that didn't even raise a stir in those two communities. With almost nobody showing up at the L.A airport to see the "Find of the Century". The local as well as world media also seemed to be out to lunch or reporting on the latest gossip news, from TV and Movieland, to bother reporting about this historic find.

On the loose and in the sewers, it felt more like home for the Yeti there, it terrorizes the city with the police hot on it's tail. Cornered in the sewer system the cops shoot, I don't know if they killed it or not, the Yeti and with that the movie ends.

Campy and unintentionally funny film thats worth a look for bad movie fans who won't be disappointed and may even get a few good laughs out of it. The Yeti is so ridicules that every time you see it come on the screen you just can't help cracking up. the Yeti in the film "The Snow Creature"is about as scary as the Three Stooges and almost as funny.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Better than expected
ChuckStraub20 March 2004
The Snow Creature, half man, half monster. The snow creature monster's costume is a bad attempt to make him look scary and half monster. All it really does is make it look like a man going out trick or treating on Halloween. I think most of the acting was ok. It had a couple of small twists that were unexpected and I think that the second half of the movie outdid the beginning. I rated this movie a 5 but it barely made that 5. If I could, I would have called it a 4+. I bought this dvd expecting it to be a bad movie and was surprised to find that it was actually better than expected. I thought it was going to be worse. While looking back at the whole movie, I must say that I liked it.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Abominable stinker!
nelsmonsterx23 February 2003
This film lacks just about everything. A good story, a cool monster, a decent actor--all are absent from this baby! It is really a test of endurance to see if you can get through it. I picked it up because A. It was cheap and 2. it had a snow monster! Snow monsters are my personal favorite, which is tragic considering that nobody makes movies about them. In fact, the best screen Yeti yet is the Wampa from Empire Strikes Back . .. and it wasn't even a Yeti! The special effects are so terrible that the cornball director used the same exact shot of the monster over and over and over again. Nevertheless, three scenes stand out in my mind: 1. An attack on a female victim in a black alley 2. The monster seen weaving in and out of cattle carcasses in a meat plant 3. Coolest of all, this scene shows the monster trying to break out of the container that brought him to the US from the so-called Himilayas. Check out Wilder's Phantom from Space for a better time.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Grade Z movie about the Yeti in America
chris_gaskin12314 November 2005
I've just watched The Snow Creature for the first time and thought it wasn't too bad, despite being a grade Z movie which stands out a mile.

An expedition travels to the Himalayas to search for Yetis and plan to bring one back to America. They come across a family of them in a cave, two parents and young. After the mother and child are killed, the dad is captured and brought to Los Angeles, but he escapes and goes on the rampage, murdering people who get in his way. He then meets his death in the Los Angeles Storm Drains after being tracked down by coppers.

Despite the ultra low budget, this isn't as bad as you may think with some fairly creepy music to help it along. Worth checking out.

Rating: 2 and a half stars out of 5.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Insanely boring.
13Funbags6 April 2019
This movie is just so boring and action-less that it's hard to watch. I could point out all the things that don't make sense but that's a waste of time. Never see this.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not as bad as it pretends to be
pmsusana3 February 2001
Most viewers and reviewers can't think of bad enough things to say about this film, and some of their barbs are justified: the film does take too long to get going, and the title creature (when he finally appears) is not an inspired creation. However, the film does offer certain rewards to patient viewers. The black & white photography is much better than one would expect, particularly the clever use of light and shadow during the film's second half. The use of the soundtrack shows imagination also. Case in point: the scene where the creature pays a late night visit to a cold storage warehouse, and is glimpsed briefly moving between the hanging sides of beef. There's no screaming or loud background music, only faint street sounds. Somehow, the silence of this scene makes it much more unsettling than it would have been otherwise.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"That night, all seemed well in the town of Shekar."
classicsoncall5 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A poor man's Chewbacca, "The Snow Creature" gives literal meaning to the term 'walking carpet'. The Abominable Snowman concept gets off to an inauspicious screen start with this offering from 1954, but unlike the intrepid explorers who bring one back alive, you won't have to reach a high altitude to get dizzy watching this one. Instead you'll be mesmerized by the hypnotic dance of the Yeti as he moves with exact precision forward and back, a feat remarkably produced by replaying the same scene over and over again.

For something a little more original, you'll have to concentrate on Sherpa guide Subra (Teru Shimada), who hijacks a botanical expedition into the Himalayan Mountains after his wife is captured by a Yeti. An inspired scene has him taking out the party's lone short wave radio with a characteristic logical explanation - "Subra only want to kill radio machine".

Probably the most interesting part of the film was the brief geography lesson at the opening, focusing on a map of the Himalayas and a brief description of it's border with the Ganges and Brahmaputra. Even though the expedition makes it's way up mountains, it's mostly down hill for the participants in this clunker. The movie is best viewed in the same condition the Yeti was kept as he was transported down the mountain from his icy lair - upside down and in a semi conscious state.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The first film to address Bigfoot/Yeti, albeit dull and in B&W
Wuchakk13 March 2014
"The Snow Creature" (1954) is a black & white picture notable as the first film to address the topic of Bigfoot or, in this case, Yeti. The atmospheric beginning segues into a relatively dull story about a fake-looking Yeti brought to America from the Himilayas, which ends up languishing in customs while officials debate whether or not the creature is a passenger or cargo, i.e. animal or human. I'm not making this up. Then the creature gets loose in the city a la "King Kong."

"The Snow Creature" is worthwhile only for historical reasons or as an interesting period piece and people smitten with the Sasquatch legend.

The film runs 71 minutes and was shot in Bronson Caves, Bronson Canyon, Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California, USA

GRADE: D+
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The first and worst of the 50's yeti horror films
Woodyanders18 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This rock-bottom '54 cheapie clinker is the first and worst fright feature made in the 50's about the legendary Abominable Snowman. This paltry carbon copy of "King Kong" (natch), "The Werewolf of London," and even the exemplary giant ant humdinger "Them!" constitutes as a most unfortunate and inauspicious cinematic debut for the yeti.

A stuffed-shirt botanist, his comparably blah assistant, and a bunch of anonymous oriental extras embark on a perilous pilgrimage into the Himalayas to discover a rare plant species. The expedition stumbles across a predatory yeti (a very tall, gangly guy in a threadbare poorly stitched together mangy fur costume) who in tried'n'true B-movie monster fashion makes off with the first available female he can get his grubby paws on. The team members manage to get the fair damsel back and capture the humanoid beast. They bring it to Los Angeles, only to have the ratty hairball escape and seek refuge in the City of Angel's grimy sewers.

An air of total creative and budgetary impoverishment permeates every aspect of this sour lemon. There's lackluster direction by Billy Wilder's no-talent brother W. Lyle Wilder, lethargic pacing, primitive fade-outs, dry acting from a just-hitting-all-the-usual-preprogrammed-marks robotic cast, tedious running-off-at-the-mouth verbose narration ("The first few days were uneventful, monotonous and routine," the botanist comments early in the nonaction, a remark which serves as an apt concise critique of the film itself), a few stomach-knotting moments of goopy sentiment, and a pitifully unimpressive star monster. But what really deflates this celluloid lead balloon is its complete lack of any trashy vitality -- this excruciatingly sorry and static yeti stinker is so inert and lifeless that it just lies motionless on your TV screen for 71 painfully draggy and dreary minutes of sheer unbearable boredom.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This Is A Really Terrible Movie
thismoviewas30 July 2006
It is insulting to humans as well as Yeti creatures.

A live Yeti get captured and the Himalayan government hands him over to two Americans.

Give me a break!

There is no way any government would let their lovable Yeti be taken out of their country.

And of course, there is no worldwide Press that runs to the Himalayas to photograph the captured Yeti.

When the Yeti is flown to Los Angeles, only 2 reporters are waiting to interview the two idiots that captured the Yeti.

Give me a break...again!

The whole airport would have been shut down with reporters waiting to see the Yeti.

Then the Yeti escapes and is finally done in at the end of the movie.

Why didn't they just do him in at the beginning of the movie so I didn't have to waste my time watching this horrible movie?

And the Yeti didn't even do anything wrong.

He is minding his own business in the Alps with his wife and child and once in while stealing a woman from the local village for whatever reason and the next thing he knows, he is in Los Angeles running for his life.

All Yeti's should boycott this movie.

Hee.Hee.Hee.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A few moody B&W scenes prop up a dull, lifeless, incoherent screenplay
lemon_magic10 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
W. Lee Wilder may not have had his brother's level of talent, but he did have enough to come up with interesting premises (in this case, what seems to be the first movie about the abominable snowman) and the occasional interesting shot or composition.

What he didn't seem to have, at least in this movie, was a sense of pacing, or a sense of what to include and omit, or (apparently) even a budget, given the incredibly annoying overuse of several completely unconvincing frames of his "creature" emerging from the darkness and then retreating back into it(seemingly by reversing the film). Seriously,they must have used this 3 second sequence 20 times or more, and it barely worked the first time. This is very symptomatic of the movie's poverty of invention.

The screenplay itself has plot holes you could drive a Himalayan expedition through. Most of the "action" in the first half of the movie consists of either silent climbing sequences, or master shots of people sleeping and talking inside their tents. And then after the creature is captured and shipped to Los Angeles, it escapes, and the whole thing turns into a police procedural/storm drain chase that would make the writers of "The Indestructible Man" giggle uncontrollably in derision. (At least IM had Lon Chaney Jr, and a flame thrower and a bazooka).

The actors don't have anything to work with here. Basically, every main character is either unlikable or dumber that dirt. The yeti itself is totally unconvincing - the costume appears to be a shaggy rug wrapped around a tall, slender actor.

Don't waste your time with this one. It's not good enough to watch as a movie, and it's not bad enough to be any fun.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Yes there is more left to say about this movie
HEFILM4 July 2010
I went on Wilder bender and watched three of his movies in a row, but the bender stopped here. The yeti suit is bad and to make matters worse most of the footage of the yeti is the same shot used over and over again and run backwards and forwards to make him step in and out of the light and then sometimes freeze frame him in place. The copy I saw was so poor it was at times hard to tell if it was the Yeti or just one of the other characters wearing a furry hat.

In some wide shots, the Yeti at least looks really tall and they seem to have designed some kind of a monkey butt type butt. Then again most Yeti suits are bad, this one is of a kind.

But wow this movie is certainly among the worst of the pre-Sci-Fi channel bigfoot movies, all of which are the worst of a lousy genre and unfairly treated monster. One of the riddles of film. Why is it there are virtually no good bigfoot movies?

The movie turns into sort of The Third Man with the police chasing the Yeti around in the Sewers, here boring shots get repeated and some lighting gear gets into one shot.

Acting from the leads is OK and the opening Tibet section is slow but kind of decent, when the Yeti gets to America it's all over though.

Scene in the meat locker is one of the few effective scenes. Director of photography Crosby who shot Corman's good films can't do much with this one. It's not good, then gets bad when Yeti hits the streets. The suit does look like a poodle and it seems like they forgot to shoot any footage of it then had to reuse stuff to be able to edit the scenes together properly.

Big Wilder mis-step this go round.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Did Asylum make movies in the 1950's?
danzeisen7 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Inexpensive does not have to mean bad, but it does mean being resourceful and clever. You want those qualities? Look elsewhere. W Lee Wilder makes the first modern Yeti movie and, there are a few good scenes. One of the expedition hears a strange noise at night and goes outside to investigate with a flashlight, and just misses seeing the creature. Fear and intensity make an appearance, and are then squandered by endlessly dull stock type shots of the expedition trudging through the snow. The lead guides "woman" is captured and he hijacks the expedition to find her. They find the Yeti, he tries to kill them, instead he accidentally kills his own mate and child, knocking himself out in the process. Forgetting the woman they came to rescue, they ship the creature to America in a Frigidaire. A customs official holds them up to investigate, and the thing escapes. They should have waited 40 years and had him come across the border as an undocumented worker! Of course the Police have to track him down, as he is killing folks in LA. To me the creature looks like a man wearing clothes who stuck some substance resembling fur on them. He is the worst 'Monster' I can recall, resembling not so much a poodle, but a mangy dog wearing levi's. Of course they kill him. So much opportunity to make a good movie gone to waste. Music was good, dialog weak and script pretty cornball. Has its moments, but they are few.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
not horrible
asinyne3 April 2006
I watched this recently and was entertained to a respectable degree. While I agree that the Yeti wasn't much and in fact sometimes seemed secondary to other things, there was something weirdly compelling that kept me interested. I suppose that the movie is just very different. The photography was interesting and the writing was good. Essentially, this is sorta a poor man's remake of the original King Kong and I'm pretty sure it was aimed at the same audience. The cast really looked cold in the first half of the film as they walked here and there on a very snowy mountain. I liked the scene where they found the cave and were glad to get out of the wind and snow. It reminded me of how strange people are as they actually do go to places like that for some reason or other that doesn't make sense to me. Later the action moves to the United States and the Yeti gets loose underneath the city. The photography is still pretty good in these scenes. Check this one out, maybe you find it oddly attractive like I did. Atmospheric. I'm still wondering what in heck happened to the guide's wife, guess she became a Yeti's mate?
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Forgettable early Yeti junk
Bloodwank28 February 2011
The Snow Creature can claim to be the first film ever made about the Yeti. What it can't claim is quality, which is unfortunate. Things commence with some potential, a botanical expedition into the Himalayas by a Dr. Frank Parrish gets derailed by vengeful guide Subra whose wife has been abducted by the Yeti. This part of the film does alright in a vacant sort of way, an atmosphere of constant cold, howling wind and darkness is nicely evoked giving the mountain journey a certain clammy power. There's interest too in the interactions of Dr. Parrish and Subra, Dr. Parrish wants nothing more than to pursue his own goals and cares nothing for the plight of the stolen lady, an utterly typical control questing scientist thrown up against the primal needs and power of another culture. Regrettably the writing doesn't escalate this conflict into an especially exciting sphere and the actors lack much in the way of drive or gravitas, but there is nonetheless a certain charge there. Suspense as well as we watch the chain of cold, heavy pack humping explorers head up the mountain in search of a beast unknown, there's fun anticipation to be had. But then the Yeti is actually revealed and things go tits up from there on out, frankly. Its a shoddy beast, an unimaginative costume lacking much in the way of hair (appears to be made from threadbare carpets) and without even a decent expression or menacing teeth. I guess perhaps the makers were aiming for a look of realism, a genuine representation of a missing link, but it simply doesn't work. Having ditched its suspense the film then lamely lumbers on, the beast is brought back to Los Angeles and predictably escapes, there are some shenanigans, the end. Night scenes conjure a bare modicum of atmosphere, but it isn't enough and the creature has very little to do, the odd suspense free, non-exciting attack and then its the end. Its near instantly forgettable stuff, aside from a hilarious discussion of whether the Yeti is a man or an animal. What makes this inspired bit of nonsense all the more amusing is the fact that it isn't too wide of the realities of bureaucratic nonsense and would likely take place even today. Oh and another plus is Teru Shimada being suitably fierce as Subru as well as stoic performances across the board. Still not enough to make the film worthwhile though. Basically this is utterly skippable stuff, not weird or interesting enough to be worthwhile for anyone but completists, and even they aren't likely to have a good time. 4/10
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Is the snow creature human?
williammccarson23 February 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In this movie, a botanist captures a eight foot tall furry snow creature, and ships it to the US. There, apparently, the US Customs service brings up an interesting question, namely, what the #### is this thing? Only a government bureaucracy would care about insignificant details like that.

By the way, only a brilliant botanist would convince someone to fund a plant-finding expedition to the Hymalayn mountains, where there are no plants. Brilliant.

That's why I like this movie. This guy can do anything, like pick up the phone and order a customized, refrigerated, snow creature shipping box and have it delivered to nowhere, Nepal. And have a hand supply of snow creature tranquilizer on hand. And fix radio machines that have been shot by a rifle.

No sex, nudity, or common sense are to be found in this fun caper.

Enjoy.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Forget-i Yeti!
mark.waltz21 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Dismally made sci-fi yarn of a trek to the Himalayas to search for rare flora and fauna which (in addition to have been a more interesting plot possibility than this one) leads to the discovery of a Yeti seen in the constantly repeated same shot with a bad edit as it is continuously repeated every time this solitary creature appears. When the Yeti is captured (and kept in something that looks like an antique phone booth), it is flown to civilization, and escapes with nowhere to hide. Since they obviously didn't give the poor creature a credit card, I guess he/it couldn't check into a hotel.

This is another example of human beings going where they shouldn't be and thinking that they have the right to capture a creature like this, take it away from the only home it has ever known, and bring it back to what we call civilization in order to further research it. Lousy photography makes this one almost impossible to watch at any rate, with the acting ludicrously amateurish and the script so bad it feels like it was written in crayon. Filmmakers should be given a list in cinema school of "What not to do" and ordered to watch them. This would be near the top of the list.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed