Our Very Own (1950) Poster

(1950)

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
No stereotype
samhill521511 October 2009
I watched this movie on the strength of comments on this site. I was not a great fan of any of the actors save for Natalie Wood and Ann Dvorak and neither was the headliner. But I stand corrected. Notwithstanding the negative comments posted by adopted IMDb members I found the film compelling on several levels. It touched me deeply. Several scenes brought tears to my eyes with the same effect on my wife who is the tough one in the family. They weren't melodramatic, just done with the right dose of pathos to convey feelings and put the viewer in the characters' places. Each member of the family was successively portrayed and then relegated to the background to focus on Ann Blyth's character, her adoptive parents and her birth mother. All these actors' performances were just right, Dvorak's in particular.

One scene stands out in my mind and I don't think I'm giving much away in retelling it: after Blyth discovers she was adopted she asks the family maid Violet - played by Jessica Grayson in another memorable performance - if she knew. Violet answers "Honey I was here when they brought you 18 years ago". Grayson delivered it with just the right amount of sensitivity to underscore to us and the deeply wounded Blyth that the circumstances of her birth had no effect on her status within the family. There were many more such vignettes, when Blyth returns at 3am and gets yelled at by her father, when Blyth and Wyatt get tangled up in the meaning of the word "mother" the morning after the revelation, the look of fear on Wyatt's face when she allows her second daughter to look for her birth certificate. They showed us a strong, caring family, with patient, intelligent and understanding parents capable of mistakes they were not afraid to admit and tackle. Nobody was all good or all bad, just people with a full range of human strengths and frailties, people like you and me.

I could go on like this forever and give away the whole plot but I'll stop here and close with another memorable scene I feel rounds out this movie. It takes place before Blyth discovers she's adopted, on the beach with Farley Granger. They come out of the surf, draw close and Blyth reaches up on her tiptoes to kiss Granger. The camera draws away and looks down on them from high up as the waves approach them from both sides to merge where they stand. There was a raw sensuality to this scene. It was full of the passion that complements altruistic love.
29 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Melodramatic movie with interesting topic
banse27 November 2001
Director David Miller takes us into the lives of a homespun family where everything appears to be peachy until one of the teens find out that she is adopted. After such a shock she eventually wants to locate her birth mother and thats when "Our Very Own" gets interesting. The dependable cast includes Ann Blyth as the adoptee, Joan Evans and Natalie Wood her sisters, Jane Wyatt and Donald Woods their parents, Farley Granger and Martin Milner as the guys who console the gals. However its Ann Dvorak as the distraught birth mother who walks away with the picture with her usual expertise. Although this Samuel Goldwyn production didn't meet critical expectations it did make money for RKO Studios.
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Annie's Adoption Pangs
bkoganbing27 September 2009
Our Very Own starts out presenting the average American family picture that folks would later come to expect on such shows as Leave It To Beaver and The Donna Reed Show. Parents Jane Wyatt and Donald Cook have three beautiful daughters, Ann Blyth, Joan Evans, and Natalie Wood in descending order. It's a red letter day in the family with Ann's impending graduation from high school.

The girls have their usual teen problems including a nice little rivalry between Blyth and Evans for Farley Granger. But when Evans while looking for her own birth certificate finds Blyth's adoption papers, she uses them without measuring the consequences.

The film is nice family entertainment for the time and I have to say the sentiment is kept in check for this type of film. Our Very Own got an Academy Award nomination for Best Sound Recording.

But the young leads Granger and Blyth are too old and look it to be playing teens. Granger was 25 and Blyth 22. On the other hand Joan Evans was 16 and Martin Milner 19 and the script has them a year younger than Granger and Blyth. There's also a great performance by Ann Dvorak as Blyth's birth mother.

Still Ann delivers a nice performance and it really would have been nice had they given her a song to sing, maybe at the climax which is the graduation.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mother Knows Best
dougdoepke1 October 2009
It's 1949 and adoption is a stigma—at least in some people's eyes. Anyway, the Goldwyn studios continue their saga of America's middle class (e.g. The Best Years of Our Lives {1946}) by building a screenplay around this social theme. Of course, the Macaulay family are a highly idealized version of the real middle class. For example, note how unfailingly courteous and civilized family members are despite surging emotions. Sure, daughter Joan's hormones get the best of her and she behaves badly, but in a way that's still refined. And note Mom's unfailingly wise council and forbearance in Jane Wyatt's early version of Mother Knows Best.

Despite obvious sincerity, the film's Hollywood treatment guarantees a predictable ending from the very start. I just wish the screenplay had dealt with the more difficult aspect of adoption—namely, the factor of an unknown genetic inheritance among those contemplating marriage and who care about such things. And that could well apply to an upwardly mobile neighborhood such as the Macaulay's. But including a genetic factor would have resulted in a much more difficult and darker film.

Still, it's an entertaining movie despite the compromises. That opening sequence is a gem of youthful high-spirits and frustration thanks to Natalie Wood and Gus Schilling even if he is doing schtick (as one reviewer noted). The scene is not just a good one, but also aims to persuade us that the Macaulay's are a real family like anyone else's. Anyway, I agree with those reviewers who find Blythe and Granger a little long-in-the-tooth to be playing teenagers, though it's one of the movie's lesser compromises. Yes, Ann Dvorak is good as the self-conscious birth mother. But I really like Joan Evans' turn as the jealous sister. Catch her subtle facial expressions as she goes through any one of her many emotional conflicts— a fine, unheralded young actress. Also standout is young Martin Milner. His totally unaffected teenager seems light years from his high school peer, the maturely sophisticated Blythe.

And speaking of Milner's gawky teen, I can't help noticing the chuckles we get from his rather callous treatment of pudgy, plain-Jane Gwendolyn (Rita Hamilton). For a film otherwise sensitive within its limits, that same concern apparently doesn't extend to an unattractive girl made the butt of mood lightening gags in a seemingly guilt-free manner. I'm not sure what the moral is, but I don't think it's a good one. Anyway, the movie remains an interesting, if idealized, time capsule of a period when apparently every teenage boy owned a hotrod.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Be patient, it gets good
mls418221 April 2021
The film starts out feeling sickeningly saccharine. Natalie Wood's character is extremely annoying. I guess they did this to establish what a happy family they are. It is overdone. The film gets serious and very good - especially for its time. Ann Dvorak is outstanding as usual.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well-directed family tale of teenage angst, sibling rivalry, and post-adoption dramatics...
moonspinner5527 September 2009
Bustling upper-middle-class suburban family attempts to deal with the new tension which has descended into the household after one of the daughters discovers her older sister is adopted--and lets her know it for the first time after throwing herself at her sister's boyfriend. What begins as a light domestic drama takes a sharp left turn midway, nearly becoming a soapy stew. Thankfully, screenwriter F. Hugh Herbert keeps his story on track emotionally for much of the way, resulting in a fascinating saga about parental responsibility, petty behavior between siblings, secrets and lies between loved ones. Some of the situations are dramatically heady; credit director David Miller with carefully maneuvering the piece from one episode to the next, also the cast for nimbly keeping their balance. Perhaps in an attempt to smooth out the ruffled feathers, the big finale at graduation is topped off with too many happy ribbons. Still, this is an absorbing, unusual, enjoyable film, with good work from Ann Blyth, Jane Wyatt, Donald Cook, and Natalie Wood; excellent support from Ann Dvorak as Blyth's 'real' mother. **1/2 from ****
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice, warm film
blanche-25 September 2007
Ann Blyth is "Our Very Own" in this 1950 film also starring Joan Evans, Jane Wyatt, Donald Woods, Phyllis Kirk, Natalie Wood, Ann Dvorak, Farley Granger and Martin Milner. Blyth is Gail, the oldest of three girls in an idyllic '50s family. She's in love with Chuck (Farley Granger) whom her sister Joan is trying to take away from her. She's also preparing for her high school graduation; she will be speaking at the ceremony. On her 18th birthday, Gail gets into yet another heated argument with Joan, during which Joan blurts out something she just learned by accident - that Gail is adopted. Even with a perfect mother like Jane Wyatt and a loving father like Donald Woods, Gail doesn't take it well and demands to meet her "real mother," Mrs. Lynch (Ann Dvorak).

"Our Very Own" gives a good idea of what the '50s were like. You never told anyone anything for their own good was just one of the tenets - that includes Gail's parents not telling her she was adopted and Mrs. Lynch not telling Mr. Lynch she had a baby that she surrendered for adoption. Also, this was a private adoption, done through an attorney, which was very common in those days.

Ann Dvorak has the strongest role as the biological mother, and she's excellent, creating a vibrant character without the class of Gail's adopted mother and with a lout for a husband. Her intentions are good - they probably always were - but she's lived her life under someone's thumb and has never been able to pull it together. Blyth does a complete turnaround from Veda in "Mildred Pierce," the role for which she will always be identified, and plays a mature, responsible young woman. Natalie Wood plays her brat sister - by the end of the first scene, you want to slap her. Joan Evans and Phyllis Kirk are both very good, Joan with her slutty moments and beautiful Phyllis, a favorite of mine from the "Thin Man" television show is good as Gail's best friend. Was there ever a mother as ideal as Jane Wyatt? Like Margaret on Father Knows Best, she's practical, kind, wise and lovely. Donald Woods doesn't have much to do, but plays the loving father well. Handsome Farley Granger makes a great suitor, and Martin Milner as a goof - a role he played often in his early career - is cute.

My only objection is that Gail's mother is too good to be true, her boyfriend is too good to be true, and her best friend is too good to be true. But those sisters - whoa.

A good movie with a lot of heart.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mother Knows Best
wes-connors27 July 2011
A suburban Los Angeles family is rocked by the revelation one of three daughters is adopted. The label is placed upon eldest Ann Blyth (as Gail Macaulay), a high school teenager about to graduate. She dates handsome TV installation man Farley Granger (as Chuck), who says "mother knows best." As it often happens, middle daughter Joan Evans (as Joan) arrived right after the adoption. Jealous of older sis, Ms. Evans would like some kissing time with Mr. Granger. Otherwise perfect mother Jane Wyatt (as Lois) could never find the right moment to tell Ms. Blyth she was adopted...

Real mother Ann Dvorak (as Gert) has a hard life. Father Donald Cook (as Fred) smacks his girls with an open palm. Mouthy littlest daughter Natalie Wood (as Penny) annoys the heck out of genuinely funny Gus Schilling (as Frank) when he installs the family's new TV set. Fresh-faced teenager Martin Milner has the best up-and-coming role and adoring family servant Jesse Grayson dons her maid uniform for the last time. "Our Very Own" is a slickly produced melodrama which suggests that Samuel Goldwyn, if he were born 50 years later, would have been very successful in 1950s television.

****** Our Very Own (7/27/50) David Miller ~ Ann Blyth, Farley Granger, Joan Evans, Jane Wyatt
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Green-Eyed Monster
movingpicturegal21 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Very well-done melodrama about teenage Gail, in love with gorgeous Farley Granger - but her younger sister Joan is mad about the boy too (and does her very best to try and steal the guy away from her sis). When Joan accidentally stumbles upon a big family secret - that Gail was actually adopted but never told - the green-eyed monster is set loose, and Joan spills the beans causing her sister to seek a meeting with her birth mother.

Interesting story and excellent performances all around, particularly by Ann Blyth who plays Gail, make this film a winner. Ann Dvorak appears in a small part here as the birth mother, and her performance is both touching and quite memorable. Plus, watch for a young Natalie Wood who appears in this as the girl's pesky, chatterbox littlest sister. An absorbing film, well worth seeing.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dated postwar dating devolves into powerful family drama
muulesaver12 August 2007
Behind the well-woven plot of a budding high school graduate's family problems is an earthy, though somewhat stereotypical examination of a Caucasion based, middle class existence in suburban America of 1949. Ann Blyth earnestly portrays the vicissitudinous impact of a revelation about her character's childhood. The storyline backdrop comes complete with proper but sincerely well meaning parents and a beloved, part-of-the-family, African-American housekeeper and cook (portrayed with gentility and grace by Jessica Grayson in her final film role) without whose valuable, understated contributions the family's daily routine would be reduced to chaos. Finally, of course, there's the obligatory family dog, playfully short-circuiting the household.

As depicted in this typical period film people dressed more formally, even in hot weather (for whatever reasons!), with air conditioning yet to permeate even modern, well equipped homes. As a rule, practical personal dress comfort didn't prevail over formality until the 1960's.

The prolonged initial sequence showcases a wonderful nuisance of a girl (scene-stealing Natalie Wood) "helping" with the installation of a new television, the up and coming electronic marvel of the day (whose commercial success was on the verge of becoming reality, thanks in part to some price breaking discoveries that soon rendered TV sets sufficiently affordable for the masses). Boys and girls were portraying themselves while being quietly groomed for achieving good citizenship standards as defined by the generally conservative post-war period.

In "Our Very Own" personal relationships expressed themselves in ways that depicted subtle, yet significant differences from those of years to come, revealing an overall interesting and introspective perspective of the fairly tranquil, but brief period between World War II and the Korean War. The latter event broke shortly before the public release of this film in 1950. Meanwhile, as the storyline reveals, the "cold war" had already begun and, for many people, nuclear experimentation was beginning to command a scary center stage presence. Other "hot" issues of the day include McCarthy type anti-Communism (or Anti-Americanism as it was in actuality!), racial and ethnic equality and mixed sexual attitudes; but in "Our Very Own" we are deliberately steered inward, into family and personal matters, with the broad and burgeoning concerns of the day kept at bay...almost. Issues such as those mentioned above are not directly infiltrating any aspect of daily life in the treatment offered here, except for occasional inference. The period feel is thereby enhanced.

As "Our Very Own" grapples its way toward the emerging central theme of adoption, its still subtle stigmas of the times permeate the otherwise gentile facade of the featured suburbanite family. Ann Dvorak, in character, offers a fine portrayal as a birth mother as opposed to a rearing one. Her persona is carved from the "other side of the tracks" folks, but a sensitive manner prevails. She exudes pathos, yet maintains dignity for all concerned.

Now, some sixty years hence, we are treated to a time capsule view of an earlier, mostly bygone, America complete with some focal points of its day plus those things eternal that seem to pass through generations, oblivious to time and technology. The story line may be unremarkable (although it maintains interest) but the real and stylized adaptations of Middle American life at the time are enhanced by fine performances that lend a glimpse into aspects of our culture that were probably at least partly present at mid-century past.

One acoustic footnote: "Our Very Own" also concentrates on excellent sound and sensitive background music. An Oscar nomination was achieved for Best Sound Recording.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sappy and silly
beetiesmom20 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know if this has a spoiler in it or not but I'm not taking any chances. I am probably wearing my feelings on my sleeve with this movie, too, as I am an adopted person myself. Don't know why I have watched this film more than once because I always get so mad~~~which is pretty silly. I hated that Gail's parents couldn't bring themselves to tell her she was adopted, how Gail's adopted mother told the birthmother that her other two children "were their own", Gail's look of icky disgust when her birthmother was lower-middle-class (Gail looked at the woman as if she had leprosy), the fact that the birthmother was portrayed as common, and the snippiness of both the adoptive mother and the 16-year-old sister. Of course, the father was a complete idiot. Had I been the housekeeper, I'd have poisoned the whole bunch of them except, well, cute little Natalie Wood.

Okay, so I'm a tad sensitive, so sue me. I know that few adoptees are as fortunate as I am to have found my birthparents and that they are wonderful people, and my half-siblings (well, most of them) are sweet and accepting. I have an adoptive mother I adore and who never kept my adoption secret; she is nearly 90 now and I worship the ground she floats above.

Anyway, movie plots back then were a bit different (gross understatement). For those not adopted, I guess it's a cutesy-pie little trip, but I hate this movie and this is the LAST time I will ever watch it!
9 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My Three Daughters.
copper19637 January 2008
Kids. They're everywhere. Always underfoot, or out and about, and it's only a matter of time before one spills the beans and unearths your family's buried secret. In this timely drama from the far-off Forties, the secret in question is the past adoption of the oldest daughter, played by the always capable Ann Blyth. She was an actress who was small boned, with a porcelain-like face and a voluminously deep cadence. Afterall, she was a trained opera singer. Although petite, it was always difficult (for me) to view her as a teenager.

Let me first say, the extended opening sequence concerning the arrival and assembly of a spanking new television set is quite remarkable. First, I found it difficult to believe that televisions came in pieces like your kid's bicycle. Second, the rather tipsy and unstable relationship between the two oldest girls is on display--roof-side--within full view of all the neighbors. And us. The man of their dreams just so happens to be the fellow who is installing the aerial on the family's roof. The entire scene teeters on the shingled see-saw of a colossal courting snafu. And third, the youngest daughter's constant badgering of the other delivery man, as he attempts to assemble the glowing box of fuses and tubes, can only be described as finger-nails-on-blackboard annoying. But forgiven. Perfectly contrasted with the level-headed Blyth, Joan Evans, the middle daughter, is a revelation of bad intentions and devious schemes. But there is still something appealing about her. We don't root against her. Natalie Wood, the youngest daughter, has all of her acting ducks in a row. As usual. The best performance, however, is turned in by Ann Dvorak, playing the woman who puts baby Blyth up for adoption. She's a bundle of raw nerves in her two pivotal scenes. She smokes like an incinerator, paces back and forth and has her head on a spinning rotor. The meeting between her and Blyth is heartbreaking. The movie doesn't try to soft peddle the truth: life is not always neat and tidy like a box of soap powder.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good to watch, but some problems
sissoed18 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This movie's heart is in the right place. The best thing about this movie is that, with one exception (discussed below), no-one is deliberately trying to hurt anyone else, and everyone in it wants everyone else to be happy. Everyone thinks about other people and tries to be considerate and thoughtful, although their flaws and stupidities mean they make mistakes sometimes. Moreover, the plot never depends on any of the characters being stupid. But the movie is a creature of its time and that creates some problems.

First, the character of the younger sister, Joan, is excellently conceived and acted -- her jealous competition with the main character, her older sister Gail, drives the film to its crisis, but then when Joan sees how upsetting it is to Gail to learn she was adopted, all the jealousy disappears and is replaced by guilt, love, and concern. From that moment she stops competing for Gail's boyfriend. Second, all the women characters are well-conceived, well- intentioned (including Joan after she goes through what I just discussed) and believable. Third, the meeting of Gail's adoptive mother and her natural mother is very well done -- I found myself thinking, why are these two women so dressed and made-up, and then I realized that that is exactly what they would do. And the tawdriness of the natural mother's attire and jewelry was really touching. Fourth, the male characters are well-intentioned but annoying in their insensitivity -- which makes them more realistic, I suppose, but stupid.

The sequence at the beginning of installing the TV -- they literally assemble the parts of the TV on-site, which I found amazing -- works well, but the actor doing the assembly was doing a shtick -- it probably worked in 1949 but it was very dated, unreal, and not in keeping with the rest of the picture.

As to technical plotting, the motivation and circumstances for Joan to discover that Gail was adopted works well and is very plausible, but the way in which the movie engineers Gail's meeting with her mother during a raucous evening of cards and beer should have been re- thought. The goal is for them to meet while the mother's husband is away -- and that is easily done when Gail's adoptive mother comes calling at the natural mother's house during the day, while the husband is at work. So why can't Gail also meet her natural mother during the day -- the next day? A reason needed to be given why that wouldn't work. Second, even if the meeting of Gail and the natural mother has to be at night, and is to be the husband's bowling night, his sudden change of plans and staying at home would not plausibly result in 30+ people arriving at the house, turning it into practically a crowded bar. At most he would have had his bowling buddies, maybe 5 or 6 guys. But the drama of Gail encountering her natural mother under really raucous circumstances was a good idea, so instead of keeping the abortive-bowling-night scenario, it needed a more plausible set-up, such as Gail choosing to surreptitiously spy on her natural mother and happening to come on a night when the natural mother and her husband were hosting this noisy gang of friends. Imagine Gail, stunned, walking into the party, and she and her natural mother lock eyes while the mother is carrying a tray of beers -- like a waitress in her own home -- and the mother realizes unexpectedly this is her daughter, come unannounced -- much more dramatic, I think. Then back at Gail's house, the youngest daughter spills the secret of Gail's secret visit, that's how Gail's family has reason to worry -- this would have worked better, I think.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
If you think this is real life, you're crazy.
tsmith41728 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The movies starts off like a comedy, with 9-yr-old Natalie Wood spending 15 minutes pestering the men who come to hook up the family's new television set, but things soon turn somber.

Joan, the middle sister, is extremely jealous of the older sister, Gail, and has the hots for Gail's handsome boyfriend. She flirts openly and outrageously with him every chance she gets, and at Gail's 18th birthday party goes so far as to expose her bare shoulder to him! Jane Wyatt, the girls' mother, says to the father, "Joan is acting horribly. I must speak to her about it," and chastises her daughter about her abhorrent behavior, but if you don't listen carefully you'll think she's discussing the weather or the latest fashions because I never heard anyone get such a calm and polite scolding.

By accident, Joan has found out that Gail was (gasp!) adopted, and in a fit of jealousy and anger over being chastised at the party, blurts it out.

Now you would expect some sort of reaction by Gail -- a slap across Joan's face, an exclamation of "No! It can't be true!", fainting, crying, anger, ANYTHING -- but all we get is a blank stare and then Gail trots off to bed, and the parents just stand there.

Meanwhile Natalie Wood has all but disappeared from the story, and when we finally do get to see her again she is no longer the yakkity funny little pest, but reflective and quietly concerned about her sister's state of mind. Nice, but not true-to-form. Joan no longer envies Gail for her good looks or her boyfriend but respects her and becomes her protector, and once again we get a character who does an unbelievable 180-degree turnaround. And the parents? All they do is tell each other, "It'll be all right. She'll get over it." Gail asks about her birth parents and immediately gets all the information about them, just like that, and within a few days has made arrangements to meet the mother. No legal red tape, no closed files to worry about, no privacy restrictions, no impediments of any kind.

This is real life? I think not, not even in 1950. People have always had emotions, but you'd never know it by Ann Blythe's robot-like portrayal. She suffers silently with the shocking news of her adoption until one night, after an ugly (by her standards) meeting with her natural mother, she stays out late and when she comes home her father asks, "Do you know what your mother has been going through?" and she snaps back, "I just left my mother. She's fine." At which point Daddy slaps the bitc -- I mean, Gail -- in the face and I stood up and yelled, "Bravo! That bitc -- I mean, Gail -- has had that coming for a long time!" In conclusion, it takes too long to get to the main storyline, and once it gets there it goes nowhere, and takes a long time to say absolutely nothing. The characters were one-dimensional, unemotional and ultimately too uppity to make me care anything about them or want to sympathize with their plights.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Home Truths
kidboots3 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I can remember the beginning very well, from the first time I saw it. It was the "television" scene, establishing the safe, comfortable world of the Macauley family. Father (Donald Cook) trying to come to terms with modern technology ("I paid for it so I guess I can tinker with it"), pesky kid sister Penny (Natalie Wood), older sister Gail (Ann Blyth) trying to be grown up, middle sister Joan (Joan Evans) trying to keep up and Mom (Jane Wyatt in a dress rehearsal for "Father Knows Best") just being a rock. Joan has a huge crush on Gail's boyfriend, Chuck (a very dishy Farley Granger) who, unknowingly, encourages her - Gail is not amused.

When Joan needs her birth certificate for a summer job she stumbles across the family secret - Gail's adoption papers and during their next fight (which comes soon enough) it all comes out. Of course Gail wants to find her real mother, who is living not too far away (across the other side of the railway tracks). She is a very working class housewife, Gert, (Ann Dvorak) who has never told her husband about her youthful indiscretion. The visit is a disaster - Gert's husband is unexpectedly home with a house full of rowdy cronies. There is only time for a few hurried words but Gail's lifelong smugness and complacency are shattered.

Being Ann Dvorak, she brings all her usual emotional intensity to what is a small role but she makes Gert unforgettable. Whether pathetically trying to please ("I made you iced tea, would you like sugar and ice") to the desperate tears as she sees Gail drive away. Wanting so much to have sat down and talked but knowing Gail must look down on her, Dvorak makes you really believe. Ann Blyth is very good but what made her excellent in "Mildred Pierce" and "Another Part of the Forest" was her icy haughtiness, which is apparent here but just not needed - she comes across as a bit of a snob. So she is just not convincing in the scenes where she feels that now Gert is her mother and it is up to Chuck to tell her a few home truths. Just before graduation, when she realises her best friend Zaza's (Phyliss Kirk) father will not be there for her graduation and is not even remotely interested in it, does she start to count her blessings.

This is an excellent, tastefully made film on what was then probably a very touchy subject.

Highly Recommended.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sam Goldwyn produces a woman's picture
JohnHowardReid8 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
As we might expect from producer Sam Goldwyn, this is an extremely well-made women's picture, distinguished by its superb photography (Lee Garmes), and an involving screenplay by F. Hugh Herbert which maintains interest at a reasonably high level. The acting is fine too, the direction adept, the music score pleasing, and the sets well up to Richard Day's usual high standard. The only thing wrong with the movie is that at 93 minutes it simply runs too long and tends to out-stay its welcome. Perhaps in the hands of more charismatic players than Farley Granger and Joan Evans (Natalie Wood and Phyllis Kirk in there pitching too, but their roles are comparatively small), the screenplay would become far more involving and garner more interest? Ann Blyth does what she can with the main role.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This couple should have kept adopting
susanhathaway20 April 2021
Parents Jane Wyatt and Donald Cook should have kept adopting kids, as their two biological daughters (Ann Dvorak, Natalie Wood) are nightmarish: the older is jealous, petty, and deliberately cruel, while the younger is a rotten little loudmouthed brat who won't stay out of everyone's business. I wasn't five minutes into the movie before I wanted to strangle the youngest girl with her own pigtails. Otherwise, standard family-style soap opera.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a post-war classic
Jay0910195118 March 2007
This movie was made in 1949, just 4 years after the end of World War 2. It was a time when the average American family got to enjoy the post-war USA: Having Dad at home and not fighting a war , Mom at home instead of working in a factory making bombs , being able to buy gas anytime you wanted and having the thrill of seeing the what everyone wanted: a TV set in their home. It is with this backdrop, that one of the smaller studios, RKO, produced this wonderful and warm-hearted story of a young woman who discovers a secret kept from her since birth. It is not a typical story for it's time and that what makes it so different. It was written and directed with much care while dealing with a very sensitive subject. The major Hollywood Studios like MGM, Paramount, Warners, etc, still made all of the big-budget films, but RKO turned out some real good ones and Our Very Own is at the top of the list.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Big Fuss.
rmax3048239 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's 1950 in middle-class America. Ann Blythe is the 18-year-old daughter of a loving family. She pretty, smart, and is going to deliver the valedictorian address at her high school graduation. She has a handsome young boyfriend in the person of Farley Granger and, with him, sits on the porch swing and once in a while they get to sparkin' and a-neckin' in the most chaste way.

Then tragedy strikes. She discovers by accident that, unlike her two sisters, Joan Evans and Natalie Wood, Ann was adopted as an infant. Her life, which once seemed so sure, is now a bindle full of uncertainties. She becomes sullen, aloof, resentful, angry. She visits her "real" mother, Ann Dvorak, and finds that she was an illegitimate child. The good-natured Dvorak lives with her good-natured husband in a relatively shabby working-class neighborhood, where the men sit around playing cards and smoking cigars and the wives gossip on the couch. A train chugs along in the background. They don't even have a maid. That's how bad things are. Dvorak is a nervous wreck and, though delighted to see her daughter for the first time in eighteen years, she's kept her sin from her husband and friends and there is no room for Blythe in her life.

Is Ann Blythe justified in feeling torn apart by the realization that she is not the natural daughter of her parents? Yes. Why? For the same reason that Hallie Berry and Barack Obama are "black", even though one of their parents was white. And for the same reason that marijuana should be illegal and fine single-malt scotch should be legal, and the same reason that being gay is unnatural and being straight is normal. It's why we measure our speed in miles per hour. It's why we have separate words for "blue" and "green", which isn't the case in many other languages.

It's right because everybody says so.

In my opinion, the movie is a trumped-up tear jerker with a couple of good performances but it's an excellent demonstration of the operation of a force called "the social construction of reality". (You can probably Google it.) I speak to you as your sociologist now. The fee is ten cents.

What the loving family should have done is off-handedly let Ann Blythe know she was adopted from the moment she could understand English. It was a big deal in 1950 because we made it into a social problem. In the small Polynesian village in which I did field work, children were born, played with for a while by their natural parents, and then turned over to their older siblings or their grandparents to be raised. Everybody agreed that it was natural. There was no such thing as "adoption." A person's biological parents were known to everyone, but it wasn't important. Everyone knew who the homosexuals were too, but that wasn't important either. Two of the village's dancers, boys of no more than five or six, were casually referred to as "female males." The movie was dragged out, I thought, especially the beginning. There seemed to be an enormous amount of repetitious exposition. Points were made, remade, and then made again. It was almost an hour before the Big Reveal. However, if you want to see a comic book happiness turned into dysphoria in one big jiffy, this is the movie for it.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A permanent impression
Joel-6313 September 1999
A remarkable performance of young Ann Blyth, which caused an everlasting impression of superb acting and sweet beauty, which transmitted, in the same 50's, a smooth overall portrait on the mid-century style of the american family way of life and the behavior of their youngsters, specially to non-american viewers.
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fond look at the American Family mid-century
superstar496 November 1998
"Our Very Own," the story of a girl on her eighteenth birthday whose world is shattered when she learns she's adopted, is an excellent and most underrated film. In addition to the intense drama, it's also a typical look at the American Family in 1949 just as television is entering most American homes at that time. The cast is excellent and features a young Natalie Wood as Gail Macualey's youngest sister. It was recently released on home video for the first time and it's a treasure to own.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Post WWII America is Shattered by a Startling Revelation
aimless-4620 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"Our Very Own" (1950) is one of those films appreciated today for entirely different reasons than at the time of its release. If there ever was actually a stigma to adoption it is long forgotten, so the angst and overwrought melodrama associated with the film's central revelation seems way too extreme. On the other hand you would have expected people in 1950 to be shocked at the idea of a high school senior running around with a boyfriend who looks to be about 30, not to mention the sparks between this guy and the girl's 16 year old little sister.

But most 21st century viewers will enjoy the film for its time capsule look at life in 1949 Middle America. Particularly entertaining is a relatively long opening sequence about the delivery and installation of the family's first television set. Younger viewers should note that most American households did not acquire one of these devices until the mid-1950's, so a 1950 audience would have found the sequence almost as novel and interesting as we find it today.

This opening sequence includes a great routine between nine year old Penny (Natalie Wood) and Frank (Gus Schilling) the TV repairman. Precocious Natalie manages to hijack the film at this early stage and leave the viewer wishing she had more screen time. It is so entertaining (and so 1950) that the rather routine events making up the remainder of the film are a considerable letdown.

The Macaulay family has three sisters, 18-year-old Gail (Ann Blyth), 16-year-old Joan (Joan Evans), and nine year old Penny (Wood). The three actresses look enough alike to be actual sisters but it turns out their parents have an ugly secret; Gail was adopted as an infant. Gail is writing a speech for her upcoming high school graduation and thinking about college when she is not busy keeping Joan from flirting with her steady boyfriend (an aging television installer) named Chuck (Farley Granger). Joan is followed around by a depressed looking Martin Milner; the king of the "numerical" television series ("Route 66" and "Adam 12"). On Gail's eighteenth birthday, Joan accidentally discovers her parent's great adoption secret. During an argument with Gail she blurts out this new information and Gail goes into state of shock and anguish for the remainder of the film. It turns out that Gail's biological father was killed in an accident before she was born, but her mother is alive. A meeting is arranged but it goes bad.

This is the film's other great scene as the two Anns (Ann Dvorack plays the biological mother) play off each other quite well. Although there is a certain socioeconomic prejudice showcased, it is nonetheless staged extremely well and is quite original. Dvorack must nervously pretend before her husband and their guests that Gail is the daughter of an old friend.

Subsequent to this mother-daughter meeting comes another rather simplistic development as the father of Gail's best friend decides to skip his daughter's graduation ceremony. Thus does Gail come to appreciate the true meaning of "family".

Overall "Our Very Own" is full of solid performances but Blyth is clearly the star. She was not an actress with much emotional range and tended to specialize in women who were morose when they were not being serious. She handles the scenes of Gail's shock and depression quite well but doesn't really convey the happy pre-revelation Gail. In fact, I don't recall Blyth ever playing convincingly happy in any of her films-not even in a Snow White's Evil Queen sort of way.

Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A family idyll disturbed by sudden revelation of facts
clanciai6 February 2020
A sensitive family story with interesting complications of relationships: What do you do when you reach your 8th birthday and suddenly find out that you are not a natural daughter but adopted, so that your sisters, who have grown up with you all these years, no longer are your true sisters? Ann Blyth handles it perfectly and never shows the shock she is in, but puts on a stiff upper lip and continues to do what she has to do for her graduation. Farley Granger is her boyfriend, and he has an important say in this, which steadies her for her final act when she is making a speech at the graduation. Jane Wyatt as the mother is also perfect, but the main thing here is the perfect acting, it is totally convincing and natural all the way, like a true drama taken directly out of life, and that makes this film invaluable. To this comes Victor Young's lovely music which couldn't fit better into the picture. This is a film to love for giving important food for considerable afterthought.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Don't be so over analytical! I Love This Great Old Picture!
vilenciaproductions28 December 2020
Don't be so over analytical! Screen writer F. Hugh Herbert and others of his ilk didn't live long enough to know what the internet would be, or become, certainly not imagining that in 2020 there would be websites such as IMDB that would have fans of motion pictures discussing and rating the films that they saw. Mr. Herbert would have gotten a kick out of some of the reviews about "Our Very Own" especially the member nut case "Trpdean" talk about over analytical, good lord! Screenplays are a certain type of animal and it takes a good film director, producer and crew to make a good motion picture out of a few hundred pages of script! Motion pictures are a tremendous undertaking that requires the technical skills and talents of hundreds or men and women to produce such a thing we call movies! The reason I love this old picture for copious reasons! (I use that word "copious" for old "Trpdean") Copious indeed, but here are a few things I love about it. First off it was made at the best time in our country! There are no cell phones, smart phones, computers, women with colored hair, idiots running around covered with ugly tattoos, no CGI, no dumb car chases, foul language, sex scenes, actors with marbles in their mouths that you can't even understand what they are saying? Hand held cameras, loud over recorded sound effects, natural lighting and dark scenes that look even worse in digital cinema! (digital cinema sucks anyway!) This list of things this picture doesn't have that I like about it is endless! No covid-19 masks, no Mr. Trump or Mr. Biden, no 24 hour hell! As 2020 comes to a close, I am going to pull out the 16mm sound projector and watch a beautiful original print of Szmuel Gelbfisz's "Our Very Own" on the big screen in glorious black and white! Joan Evans was a hottie! Ann Blyth was beautiful, Farley Granger was a talented and handsome leading man, Jane Wyatt was a good looking woman, Gus Schilling was a crack up! Love little Natalie Wood, Phyllis Kirk was a babe, love them all! They all blow away all of the horrible actors of today! Movies and TV shows suck now! They have since the 1970's! It's been 40 years of trash, with very few exceptions! So get out your Covid-19 masks, take a poisonous vaccine and hope you don't die, and enjoy "Our Very Own" Now where did I put that darn old covid-19 mask?
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
**** Our Very Own Fine Film
edwagreen5 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
5 years after her solid supporting Oscar nomination for "Mildred Pierce," Ann Blyth gave another strong showing as the high school graduate-to-be who discovers that she is adopted.

Of course, we keep young precocious children away from installer's and repair people. You will not be able to keep away from Natalie Wood's performance as that obnoxious, but yet compelling child.

The film is outstanding since it deals not only with family values and strong relationships, it is a joy to see for the positive message that it ultimately brings.

Jane Wyatt and her husband certainly didn't know best by hiding the fact that Gail (Blyth) was adopted. These things always have a way of coming out and Gail feels cheated and that she suddenly doesn't belong home.

Ann Dvorak is great as her real mother.

Wonderful film and the ending is so good as we learn to appreciate what we have.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed