Ride the Pink Horse (1947) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
51 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Definite Cult Item
abooboo-230 January 2001
Not quite sure what to make of this one, but definitely interesting. One is never certain if its strangeness is due to inexperience on the part of the film-makers, or if it truly is an unambiguous artistic choice. The director and star, Robert Montgomery, was very much a creature of 1930's pre-war Hollywood and the film seems to be an unconscious attempt to transplant pre-war film-making sensibilities into the decidedly post-war genre of Film-Noir, with all of its fatalism, disillusionment and complications. It's as if Montgomery is an alien from the 30's exploring a strange, post-war Noir world; rejoicing and experimenting in this permissive new environment, but ever aware that he is not a native. (Though it's highly unlikely this idea ever occurred to him in such a concrete way, as this genre was not identified as such until French critics of the 1960's uncovered a new pattern in American films dealing with crime.)

There's much here that I, quite frankly, didn't understand. You never really get a handle on any of the characters or what their true motivations are; they're all tantalizingly enigmatic, opaque, but that is admittedly much of the joy of the picture. Everyone seems to be suffering from some kind of guilt that they just don't seem quite able to articulate, much less expiate, so they keep muddling along hoping that they'll stumble across an answer or justification for their sins. The villain of the piece, Fred Clark, is odd. He doesn't just want to trick Montgomery out of the money he's blackmailing him for, he wants to shame him for not being smart and demanding more. Montgomery is mighty odd as well, with some kind of a stubborn, indecipherable personal code of honor; sort of a dumbed down Sam Spade. He's trying to carve out some little island of corruption just for himself, stiff-arming both sides of the law in the process. Most peculiar is the little peasant girl played by Wanda Hendrix. She is instantly devoted to Montgomery, lovingly helps him out of a couple jams but at the end after they say goodbye, she makes some little speech to her friends in Spanish (w.o. subtitles) that gives the impression she was never as innocent as she let on. But what did she gain? And Art Smith (a good crafty little character actor who keeps turning up and making an impression in a lot of films I've been seeing like "Brute Force", "The Next Voice You Hear" and "In A Lonely Place") is an FBI agent who is more like Montgomery's guardian angel. He is almost God-like in how he can pinpoint the exact motivation behind Montgomery's every move and thought.

All these actors are fine, but Thomas Gomez steals every scene he's in as the deceptively heroic operator of the merry-go-round. He is involved in the film's most brutal and poignant scene, as he is beat up by a couple of Clark's thugs (as the children watch captively on the spinning carousel) for refusing to reveal his friend Montgomery's whereabouts. And I love his great line when Montgomery stumbles back for help after getting stabbed in a fight. He shrugs wearily and says "when you're young everyone sticks knife in you."

I couldn't for the life of me figure out why the movie would be called "Ride the Pink Horse", but I like the other reviewer's theory that it has to do with the arbitrary nature of life itself. A definite cult item.
52 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent noir crime drama directed by Robert Montgomery...
AlsExGal30 December 2022
In one of a couple of films done at Universal starring Montgomery that are hard to find. Ex-solider Lucky Gagin (Robert Montgomery) arrives in the little southwestern town of San Pablo during a hectic fiesta weekend. He's come here seeking revenge against the man he holds responsible for his friend's death. But his quest may be derailed by one of the motley assortment of characters he meets: scheming federal agent Retz (Art Smith, spooky-eyed young Mexican girl Pilar (Wanda Hendrix), and boisterous carousel operator Pancho (Thomas Gomez), among others.

Montgomery does a very good job in both the directing and acting departments. The film showcases several stylish flourishes, and maintains an evocative, "stranger in a strange land" aura of uncertainty and mild paranoia. His performance as the plainspoken Gagin is also a nice stretch from his usual smooth charmer. He's blunt, occasionally rude, maybe not the sharpest guy in the room, but cunning enough to be a threat to those he targets.

The movie takes an unexpected turn in the last third which helps set it apart from the other crime pictures of the period, but in my opinion it weakened the resolution a bit. I liked Hendrix, and Gomez is affable in a character type he would go on to play several times in the future. Fred Clark, as a crime boss, and Art Smith as the fed, are unusual casting choices that work. The movie earned an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor for Thomas Gomez.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Different Film-Noir
claudio_carvalho20 October 2016
When a bus arrives in San Pablo, the mysterious American Lucky Gagin (Robert Montgomery) looks for the La Fonda Hotel and he meets the local Pila (Wanda Hendrix) that offers to take him there. Gagin is a tough man and army veteran and he seeks out a man called Frank Hugo (Fred Clark) and he learns that he will be back to his room only on the next day. Gagin stumbles upon FBI Agent Bill Retz (Art Smith), who is chasing the powerful mobster Frank Hugo, and he warns Gagin to forget his scheme for revenging his friend Shorty that was murdered by Frank. Then Gagin looks for a hotel room and he goes to the Bar Tres Violetas, where he befriends the owner of carousel called Pancho (Thomas Gomez) and he buys drinks for his friends in the bar. Pancho offers a place to Gagin to spend the night. On the next morning, Gagin goes to the hotel and meets Frank Hugo. He blackmails the mobster, asking for 30,000 dollars to give a check that incriminates him. Frank Hugo accepts the deal and tell that the money will be available only at 7:00 PM. Will Gagin succeed in his extortion of money from Frank?

"Ride the Pink Horse" is a different film-noir directed by Robert Montgomery, who is also the lead actor. His bitter and unpleasant character is well-developed as a war veteran disillusioned with the post-war life since his lover is unfaithful and his best friend was murdered by a mobster. Wanda Hendrix performs a weird character, maltreated by Gagin but following him like a puppy. But the plot is a good story of friendship. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Do Lodo Brotou Uma Flor" ("From the Mud Sprouted a Flower")
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Closer Look at the Movie's Color-Line
dougdoepke16 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is noir with an unusual racial undercurrent. Ex-soldier Gagin (Montgomery) travels to New Mexico to avenge his combat buddy's murder by blackmailing the war-profiteer (Clark) responsible. Gagin turns out to be not a very nice man. His clipped speech suggests he's being penalized for every word he speaks. Yet, that terseness, direct manner, and unblinking stare also suggest a man who knows his own mind and will not bend easily, a crucial component of the story.

We get a first glimpse when he uses that hard manner to make fun of Mexican peasant girl Pila (Hendrix) by calling her Sitting Bull, implying he has neither much knowledge nor respect for the native New Mexico culture. Now, the really nuanced and understated subtext of the movie, apart from the crime drama aspect, is how the tables are subtly turned on him, especially in the final scene where Pila now makes fun of him to her Mexican friends. There's a subtle racial dynamic here that's easily overshadowed by the criminal phase, but is what really distinguishes this noir from others of the classic period.

Note, for example, how Gagin's arrogant attitude is subtly turned around, especially by the grubby carousel owner, Pancho. Thomas Gomez's Pancho amounts to an unforgettable character, and one who I think steals the movie amid heavy competition. Pancho is fat and unkempt in ways that Hollywood seldom allowed. But he's also good-natured with a big heart, which probably only the poor with nothing much to lose can be. Pancho will help a stranger and not ask anything in return, an attitude foreign to the grasping Gagin. At first, the easterner doesn't really know what to make of him or his open attitude. Nonetheless, the scene where Pancho shares his outdoor cot with the self-centered Gagin while killers stalk him is not only well played, but crucial to the city boy's growing respect for a different set of values.

It's the character Pila, however, that's both unusual and beautifully played. What's behind her immediate hooking onto Gagin. Is it his good looks, his expensive clothes, or maybe something touchier like the challenge of the color line. In fact, the movie plays this sensitive topic expertly. The color-line is never stated, but is implied in a number of ways. Note Gagin's easy familiarity with her right away, bespeaking an unspoken superiority; at the same time, she blurts out haltingly, in her best peasant dress, clearly unsure how to converse with this strange object of attraction.

The key scene with the color line, however, is luncheon in the fancy hotel. Note how Pila hesitates while the ever self-assured Gagin strides confidently into the dining-room. Even if she's just visiting for the fiesta, the Mexican girl knows instinctively she's crossing here into forbidden territory. But the really telling part, done so skillfully, is the quick glances between the peasant girl and the smartly dressed hostess who seats them. The eye contacts pass quickly, but speak volumes about social strata in that part of the country. Conversely, note how the gaiety of the Mexican saloon suddenly stops once the white man Gagin steps inside. But unlike Pila's shrinking violet, Montgomery's assured character uses his status to quickly dominate the bar scene. Once again, the subtext is underplayed, but to no less effect

However, it's that final scene that's stayed with me over the years. Chastened now by the help he's received from Pancho and Pila, Gagin goes to the carousel to say a final good-bye. He's not staying on in San Pablo now that his business with gangster Hugo is finished, implying also that his friendships there can be nothing more than passing ones given the contrasting backgrounds. But notice how hesitant Gagin is in talking to Pila for the last time as she stands boldly among her amigos. Clearly, Gagin's been changed by events and by people he no doubt first considered his inferiors. Now he stammers, no longer glibly self-assured; at the same time, she makes it no easier, staring icily and saying little. She's now clearly the dominant one, embarrassing him in front of the subtly amused government man (Smith).

Despite repeated viewings, I still see no hint of her regret at his departure. Instead it looks like she's exulting to her amigos in how she's played him for an apparent chump, which is completely contrary to her behavior throughout. I have no easy explanation for this apparent reversal, except that perhaps she's seeking to re-establish a standing among her peers despite well-concealed inner feelings. But whatever the explanation, this color-line aspect remains, I think, a fascinating one for a movie that refuses the conventional pat ending.

Anyway, the movie remains first-rate noir, with top-notch acting, scripting, and directing, especially the memorable touches like Hugo's earphone, the giant puppet, and the musical carousel. Montgomery was clearly a moviemaker with ideas. And here he succeeds in spades.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Odd but unique crime thriller highlighted by progressive view of Mexican and Native-Americans
Turfseer29 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Ride the Pink Horse is one of the more unusual film noirs you'll ever see. It's set in the fictional rural New Mexico town of San Pablo (with Santa Fe in part, as the film's actual shooting location). A war vet named Gagin (Robert Montgomery) arrives in town seeking to blackmail war profiteer Frank Hugo (Fred Clark), in revenge for the murder of his friend Shorty. Gagin possesses a canceled $100,000 check which Hugo had used to bribe a high government official. The fiesta is about to begin in town, which contains both a large Mexican and Native American population.

The characters function more on a symbolic, stylistic level, representing certain archetypes. So when Gagin meets Retz (Art Smith), a "government" law enforcement official (presumably from the FBI), seeking to gain information about Gagin's dealings with Hugo, one wonders how he already knows so much about Gagin's machinations--and why he's there with no backup.

Similarly, Gagin has no backup either and goes right into Hugo's lair and demands to see him (he knocks out the war profiteer's secretary by promptly punching him in the gut!). Later, Hugo's friend, Marjorie Lundeen (Andrea King), the apparent femme fatale of the piece, advises Gagin to jack up his $30,000 price considerably for the check Hugo seeks. Uncharacteristic of the typical criminal, Gagin refuses to cut Marjorie in on the blackmail attempt and sticks to his guns regarding the initial $30,000 demand. All the while ignoring the fact that Hugo's thugs are closing in and Marjorie could easily go back to Hugo, double crossing him.

The other part of the narrative revolves the Mexican and Native American characters Gagin encounters and interacts with. Early on he meets the enigmatic Native American teenager Pila (Wanda Hendrix), who gives him a good luck charm to ward off death. Pila apparently is looked down upon by her companions is a bit of an oddball. She however represents intuition and we immediately note that the indigenous people in this film are depicted as morally superior to the crass Americans, all guided by materialistic concerns. Gagin, while curious about her enigmatic predictions, also contemptuously refers to her as "Sitting Bull," after he receives the good luck charm.

The stature of Mexicans and Mexican-Americans in this film is further enhanced when we meet Pancho (Thomas Gomez), the kind-hearted carousel operator. Pancho is hardly put on a pedestal as he's depicted as prone to drinking and admitting that he finds women sexually unappealing, unless they're all decidedly zaftig. Nonetheless, it's Pancho who allows Gagin to sleep in his makeshift "bedroom" (right next to the carousel he operates) since all the hotels in town are full. And not only that, later he refuses to divulge Gagin's whereabouts, even while being pummeled repeatedly by Hugo's thugs.

The dark moment of the second act occurs when Marjorie lures Gagin outside the Tip Top Café, where he's promptly stabbed by one of two of Hugo's thugs who have attacked him. Gagin fights back killing one of them and wounding another. From this point on, Gagin is no longer the same man. Before, he projects an image of a man in control of everything but now he must count on Pila to save him (with her plan to take a bus back to her home town two hours away). But Gagin is so out of it (hardly in possession of his faculties at all), that he makes his way to Hugo's door back at the hotel and believes he can still effect his blackmail plan. Both Gagin and Pila are beaten by Hugo's thugs in the room after Hugo demands for Gagin to produce the check he desperately wants to get his hands on (Pila is holding the check all along).

In an unlikely scene, Retz bursts in and saves the day by holding Hugo and crew at gunpoint. Gagin then gives the check to Retz, which can be used as evidence to prosecute Hugo.

The film's scenarists avoided a sentimental denouement as Gagin is still depicted as a tough guy but obviously softened up slightly by his association with the native characters (particularly Pila). The intuitive Pila projects a haughty attitude toward Gagin, saying nothing in response to his request to say goodbye. Instead, she toots her own horn in front of her peers, proudly recounting how she saved the tough guy's life. Now instead of being an outcast and an outsider, she's gained an immense amount of confidence and restored her reputation.

Montgomery is excellent as the macho Gagin (notably Montgomery also handled the director's reins here). He easily benefitted from the extremely clever dialogue, a good deal of it penned by the former reporter turned prolific screenwriter, Ben Hecht. There are also extraordinary performances by Wanda Hendrix and Thomas Lopez, the latter having been the first Hispanic actor to receive an Academy Award nomination.

Ride the Pink Horse was based on a novel by Dorothy Hughes and produced by Hitchcock protégé, Joan Harrison. The female influence was decidedly on display here, especially in regards to the development of the Pila character within the narrative. With its non-stereotypical treatment of Mexican and Native Americans, the film deserves its place in the pantheon of progressive films of its time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Top-Notch Noir - Ride the Pink Horse
arthur_tafero5 August 2021
I don't really care very much for Robert Montgomery as a serious actor; they must have been at least a half dozen or more Hollywood actors at the time who could have handled the role better: Bogart, Cagney, Flynn, Power, Holden, Ford (etc). But despite being miscast, Montgomery pulls it off with some help from a great supporting cast. Great writing by a woman writer, Dorothy B Hughes, and a great screenplay by Lederer and Hecht (Lancaster's old buddy) provides the viewer with a real treat for atmosphere and storytelling. Gagin comes to New Mexico to square accounts with the guy who shot his partner, Shorty. Mr. Hugo is well-played by. Fred Clark. But the person who steals this film is not Montgomery, Clark or even Thomas Gomez, who was nominated for a Best Supporting Actor role as Pancho in the film. No, the film is stolen by actress, Wanda Hendrix as Pila, a wild-looking, space cadet, who is fiercely loyal to Gagin. One of the best film noir pieces you will ever see.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One you can't stop watching
SHAWFAN5 February 2005
I saw this film when I was a young boy when it first came out in 1947 but didn't truly appreciate it till I saw it on TCM the other night again. I agree with all your commentators as to its enigmatic mystery and its possible shortfalls attributable to Montgomery vis a vis Bogart. I found the dialogue and the monologues gripping. In later looking this movie up here I discovered why: the script was by Ben Hecht (of Front Page fame). No wonder it was so great. As many of your commentators point out (and very perceptively too) the individual performances of Gomez, Hendrix, Clark, etc. were all splendid, not to forget Montgomery himself. But TCM must have edited the film or else I fell asleep watching it: I definitely did not see Gomez being beaten up by anyone while being watched by uncomprehending children. That part was definitely not in the version that I watched, sad to say. One of the strongest parts of the film was the disillusionment and cynicism expressed by the Montgomery character against patriotism, and WWII and its profiteers in typical film-noir fashion. Also strikingly evocative and disturbing was the final scene in which the innocent-appearing and passive Hendrix character finally opens up to her friends and re-enacts the events of the film in a vivacious and cynical way to show her friends how sophisticated she is after all. What a dash of cold water in the face of those who expected a romantic ending between two such repressed characters who made a specialty out of never showing their emotions. A great, great movie.
34 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sufficiently different to be of interest.
MOscarbradley24 March 2022
Robert Montgomery not only took the lead in "Ride the Pink Horse" but directed it as well. It's a good noirish thriller that takes place in the New Mexico border town of San Pablo, or at least the studio where said town is 'constructed', as Montgomery's Lucky Gagin seeks out mobster Frank Hugo, (an excellent Fred Clark), presumably with the intention of killing him or, as it turns out, blackmailing him. With a screenplay by Ben Hecht and Charles Lederer it's certainly intelligent and Montgomery handles the decent plot with real skill.

Unfortunately his performance doesn't quite measure up; he's just a little too laid back and perhaps just a tad too old for the part and it's left to the supporting cast, including an Oscar-nominated Thomas Gomez, to carry the picture. It's definitely got an unusual plot that never quite goes where you expect it to and while it's not a memorable picture it's sufficiently off-the-wall to be of more than passing interest. It's not much seen these days but it's still worth seeing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is a great movie based on a great book
e-harding21 May 2004
I was in the process of reading this book and then started watching a movie without knowing what the movie was. It was deja vu all of the sudden. It turned out to be this movie. I think that Robert Montgomery did a great job of capturing the character that was in the book. Tough but naive at the same time. A very good noir film that should get more play and recognition.

The dark atmosphere,the craziness of the music and the partying in the background all the time as the story unfolds. Maybe I had a leg up reading the book almost first. It's very rare when I think a movie based on a book is just as good as the book. I felt sympathy for Robert Montgomery's character. All the time thinking he was going to lose to the cheats. He had his own principals and stuck to them.

Can't say enough.

Good movie.
33 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
San Pablo's own version of the Parade of the Roses!
jotix10010 May 2005
Never having seen "Ride the Pink Horse", we decided to take a look at it, based mainly, on the strong writers credited with the adaptation, Ben Hecht and Charles Lederer, two of the best men in the business. One wonders if it was the studio's art people that decided to give the film a phony Mexican look, or did it come from the screen play itself. Not having read the novel, we can't comment if the book had the same basic faults one finds in the finished product. The direction by Robert Montgomery doesn't help matters.

First of all, San Pablo is obviously one of the towns in Northern Mexico close to California. The first thing one sees are the local women, dressed in costumes from another century; even the trio that meets Lucky's bus, is seen in long Indian costumes, sorry, but even for 1947, it seems to be completely out of place. One wonders if the production company thought they were filming something out of Pancho Villa's times and decided San Pablo's women were still living in the XIX century.

The fatal casting mistake of having a blue eyed Wanda Hendrix playing the mysterious Pilar makes the viewer do a double take. This is a role that screams for a sultry senorita, someone of the stature of a Katy Jurado, or another sultry star, not this beautiful actress that seemed to be lost playing the Mexican girl! One thing that doesn't come across in the film is what might have made Pilar fall heads over heels with this Americano at first sight!

Even in the fiesta scenes one sees a lot of Americans marching as part of the parade. It would have made more sense to have seen local folks from San Pablo, but not from L.A. Then there is Pancho, a stereotype, if ever there was one! Thomas Gomez was an American actor born in New York, who had an impeccable diction, but he is made to speak Spanish with the heavy English accent. Talk about the things that were given to audiences of that era in the way of realism!

Lucky Gagin, during the first part of the film seems a man out of place. Mr. Montgomery's take on this man cried for perhaps another tough actor to play it. Mr. Montgomery, as a comedian, or in light fare was an excellent actor, but in heavier parts, seemed to be out of place.

The best thing going for the film is the fabulous performance of Art Smith, who at times reminded us of an old Robin Williams, as Bill Retz, the government agent looking to bring Frank Hugo to justice. Mr. Smith shines in the film every time one sees him. Also Andrea King, seen as Marjorie Lundeen, the bad girl friendly with Hugo and his group. Fred Ward as the deaf gangster has some good moments.

The film, while not a total dud, seems to be confused in what it's trying to show. Perhaps with a different treatment and better casting for the two principal roles, this film would have fared better, even with the perplexing atmosphere of the Mexican locale.
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A truly great film
Cutter-217 May 2003
An incredible film. There is so much going on and so much symbolism, the viewer cannot afford to miss a single moment. The great difficulty with attempting to make sense of most post WWII film noirs is that it is nearly impossible to relate to either the time in general or the turmoil the protagonist is going through after between one and three years in the somewhat surreal situation of extended combat. Attempting to `assimilate' to society can be extremely difficult. Many 'Nam vets can relate. At the time the film was made, just about everyone could relate because if they were not attempting to `assimilate' they knew someone who was.

The title comes from a scene where Lucky (Montgomery) wants to give Pilar (Hendrix) a free ride on Pancho's (Gomez) merry-go-round. Pilar asks Lucky which horse to ride and he replies, `Try the pink one'. What the merry-go-round is a metaphor of each viewer can decide. However, Pancho may give us a clue when during this exchange he states he gives no free rides.

Lucky is the typical movie G. I., brusque, rude and tougher than nails with apparently no real direction in life as evidenced by his cheap, rumpled suit and extremely free spending. Most assume he is out to revenge the killing of his war buddy, Shorty, by a gangster (Clark). Lucky is considered stupid because he could blackmail the gangster for much more than he is asking and essentially set himself up for life. However, Lucky recently left an environment where there was no guarantee of life beyond the moment. Is his motive actually revenge or could he be looking for something else? He recently survived a situation where his friends died on a regular basis and there was little or no opportunity for revenge. Can he even relate to revenge? You decide. At the end of the movie Lucky works out in his own mind a means of satisfying his motives. Enough said.

Pancho is the wise sage who periodically illuminates a situation with his light, off handed comments. The scheming, femme fatale (King) has a minor role, which is refreshing. However, the character who literally steals the show is Pilar a young, inexperienced, poor Indian girl who seems to mature into adulthood during the course of a few days. She attaches herself to Lucky at the beginning of the movie. The symbolism associated with her frequently appearing from behind buildings, out of alleys and hearing things no one else does is very strong and adds a true sense of mystery to the character. Retz ( blacklisted Art Smith), a government agent, and Pilar are often found protecting Lucky from himself. Pilar later explains to Retz that she befriended Lucky because she saw death in his face. Pilar assumes the `death' she saw is in the future but it could very well be that Lucky, after extended combat, is living a type of death at that moment. One of the movie's most compelling scenes is at the end when Lucky, knowing full well what he owes Pilar, has great difficulty determining how to say good-bye. Retz knows Lucky is struggling. Pilar, having greatly matured, understands either Lucky's predicament or `the facts of life' and handles the situation with the maturity of one well beyond her years. The beatings Pancho and Pilar take rather than betray Lucky also have strong symbolism, the weak defying the strong and eventually prevailing. Keep in mind this is 1947.

This is an extremely powerful movie that leaves so many questions unanswered, one cannot help but wonder long after the movie is over about what lead up to this small piece of Lucky's life, what was actually occurring during the movie and Lucky and Pilar's future.
34 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A thug finds redemption and negation in a Mexican town.
treywillwest10 May 2015
As the Criterion commentator says, this is kind of an anti-Noir.

It follows a criminal low-life intent on revenge of a sort on one of his kind. To get what he wants, he resorts to all manner of masculine clichés of hardness as he tracks his prey to a Mexican border town. But rather than finding success, or destruction, (two opposing forms of affirmation) through this brutishness, the tough is instead emasculated, made helpless and irrelevant to the narrative that supposedly revolves around him.

The traditional noir anti-hero, rather like the classical Tragic Hero, is both empowered and doomed by his capacity for violence. Here, the anti-hero is saved by his inability to determine his own fate. Instead, an alien and indifferent culture chooses to save him, simply as an act of good will, or, as it amounts to the same thing, for the cheap thrill of doing so.

The Noir Anti-Hero, like the Tragic Hero, becomes the pinnacle of the (doomed) world but cannot escape the horrible fate that world has in store for its subject. This movie's protagonist escapes this fate by becoming irrelevant to the space of its narrative world.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Is it a bribe or blackmail?
michaelRokeefe9 January 2004
Robert Montgomery directs and stars in this seldom seen piece of Film-Noir. A hard-boiled war vet(Montgomery)arrives in the small town of San Pablo as the community is preparing its annual fiesta. He gets the help of a carousel owner(Thomas Gomez)and an alluring young woman(Wanda Hendrix)to track down a profiteer to blackmail him as revenge for killing his buddy. At times it is hard to tell the good guys from the bad. Well directed and photographed. Hendrix is absolutely beautiful. Also in the cast are: Fred Clark and Art Smith.
23 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of my favorite Robert Montgomery movies...
karloski21 May 2004
This is a classic pseudo film noir. It means to emulate, but not necessarily be, a true film noir.

Robert Montgomery is excellent and believable as a man driven to revenge the death of his war time pal.

The scenes with Wanda Hendrix as, in turns, a guileless teen, a knowing friend and a woman who 'sees things' are taut and dramatic. There are a few moments of humor there too.

Mr Montgomery's direction is both intelligent and convincing. There are moments of drama. Moments of near pathos. Moments of comedy. Moments of boredom - from the characters, not the audience.

The 'Fed' and 'Pancho' the carousel owner are interesting and engaging characters. Not hollow or cardboard cutouts that one might see in some films.

All in all it is a very enjoyable film and a must see for those that appreciate both the acting skills and the directorial skills of Mr. Robert Montgomery.
21 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
watch the strange movie
paradux29 July 2017
I am a huge fan of Montgomery.

He starred in two of my all time favorite films, Here Comes Mr. Jordan and The Lady in the Lake (which he also directed).

Here he both stars and directs but unfortunately that is not enough. Films in border towns turned out to be the kiss of death for adventurous Hollywood producers. Even Charlton Heston tried one (actually playing a Mexican!) and it almost ruined his career.

Montgomery has personality, star power, and directing chops to spare. But again, just not enough. The film never gets moving and the faux Mexican overlay (here Wanda Hendrix puts on heavy makeup to play the Mexican love interest) strangles the film in its sleep.

An irony Philip Marlowe would appreciate.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Enigmatic Film Noir is rich viewing experience
steveg-3727 November 2005
For me this movie is a fine example of the exotic "Old West" or "Old Mexico" of the '30s-'40s east coast imagination.

It has an ambiance similar to a Roy Rogers movie where the gangsters drive cars and fly airplanes, but Roy on Trigger is able to ride over the hill and cut them off. Business suits mix with cowboy outfits and Mexican girls in traditional dresses.

To correct some of the other reviewers, the fictitious San Pablo of the movie is actually Santa Fe--the La Fonda Hotel is a historic landmark near the main square of Santa Fe. Cowboys and Indians and lots of Americans in the on screen Fiesta are not that out-of-character after all because it is not actually in Mexico.

That said, the movie has an enigmatic, exotic, mysterious feel which is sustained throughout. The fact that you don't know much about the characters contributes to the enigma.

I liked all the actors, especially Thomas Gomez, and feel that the film has many glimpses of Mexican-Americans depicted more as actual people and less as comic-book caricatures than in other movies from the same period.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bob Montgomery Goes Noir
bkoganbing27 November 2005
Robert Montgomery has come to town for some blackmail. He's got a canceled check that mobster Fred Clark has sent to someone as a payoff and he intends to get rich from it. For himself and for a friend that Clark had rubbed out.

In the sleepy U.S./Mexican border town Montgomery falls in with the locals and makes some friends of Wanda Hendrix and Thomas Gomez who got an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actor. And he's got a pretty shrewd FBI agent in Art Smith trailing him. Smith is in the tradition of Regis Toomey, a pretty smart cop himself in The Big Sleep.

It's a good film, not a great one by any means. Montgomery was far better in such pre World War II items like The Earl of Chicago insofar as gangster roles are concerned. Fred Clark as the mobster is minus his slow burn routine which he does so well in comedies. Clark had the best slow burn in films next to Edgar Kennedy.

But the best performance in the film hands down has got to be Andrea King. She's Clark's mistress/moll and she sets the rather gullible Montgomery up, but good. You don't want this woman working against you by any means.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Definitely recommended.
Gypsy196215 June 2001
From the film's opening scene, which shows the protagonist, Lucky Gagin, emerging from a bus into a dusty Mexican town, the viewer is hooked. There are so many good things about this film, primarily the acting performances -- Robert Montgomery is a standout, as are Wanda Hendrix, Fred Clark, Thomas Gomez, and Art Smith. They each completely occupy their characters and make them come to life. Another highlight is the dialogue -- there are numerous memorable exchanges between Montgomery and Hendrix, and Clark delivers two especially well-written diatribes that serve to solidify his character in the consciousness. The story itself is quite simple, and is driven far more by characterization than by plot, but that is what makes the film so good. The film also contains its share of classically dark noir imagery -- most memorable is the scene in which the Gomez character is savagely beaten by two hoods while a group of neighborhood children sail along on the nearby merry-go-round, at first gaily enjoying the free ride but growing increasingly somber and afraid as they witness the brutal attack. This one is a definite must-see, particularly for film noir buffs, but also for film lovers of all types.
20 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Most probably, the best work by Robert Montgomery, as a director and actor both
SAMTHEBESTEST28 April 2024
Ride The Pink Horse (1947) : Brief Review -

Most probably, the best work by Robert Montgomery, as a director and actor both. Finally, I have my most favourite film by Robert Montgomery. What's been missing in his other movies, I got everything right here. Much of its credit goes to the genre, I guess. The "film noir" genre has something alcoholic in it that makes you groove, sometimes slowly, sometimes quickly. Ride the Pink Horse is one more fine example of it. It starts gripping you in the 15th minute or so and never lets you get out of it. The dark world is really gritty and engrossing. There is no suspense or mystery, yet you are hooked on it and eager to know what's going to happen next. Lucky Gagin arrives in a rural town to blackmail a mobster as retribution for the death of his best friend. The mobster tries to kill him and get what he wants, but Gagin is protected by a cop and a young girl. That's all the plot you have here, and still, there is so much in the screenplay. Montgomery's smart story-telling is responsible for that. He compiles intriguing situations with terrific dialogue and serves you with classy crime noir. The climax of his trip may be predictable, but he added a nice touch of human feeling to the ending scene. It's true; it's very difficult to say "good-bye," even if you are a brave man. You sense a love story, but it can't be. It would have been childish then. So, Montgomery makes it a smart ending with the final goodbye, which becomes somewhat emotional. Robert Montgomery has done a brilliant job as a director and actor. Wanda Hendrix has totally surprised me. That reluctant smile on her face in the ending scene.. I can't forget that easily. Thomas Gomez as Pancho is delightful. Whatever, but this film belongs to Robert Montgomery's genius. The idea of disillusioned soldiers was getting mainstream then, and he used it so smartly. In short, a film noir for those who understand this genre.

RATING - 7.5/10*

By - #samthebestest.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Typical example of a good film noir
mandy_feys3 May 2003
This film is an excellent example of the film noir genre. It is more about atmosphere than it is about a plot. This is not to say there is no plot in the movie, far from it. It is just that it doesn't really take centre stage. Centre stage goes to the actors. Robert Montgomery is excellent as an ex-soldier, who is clearly disillusioned with Uncle Sam. Or so it seems... Because all is definitely not as it seems in this movie! And Wanda Hendrix portrays a mysterious Mexican girl in brilliant mode. Ride The Pink Horse is obviously a strange title for a movie. A ten for originality though, but you will have to watch carefully if you want to discover the pink horse... I can heartily recommend you watch this movie, if you like film noir, because all in all this is sort of a mesmeric movie, which will keep your attention right up until the end...
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mysteriously Charming!
julianhwescott26 January 2001
I found myself not wanting this movie to end as it really held my attention. Definitely mysterious, definitely film-noir, Robert Montgomery really did a great job directing and acting in this film. Set at fiesta time in a small Mexican village, there are a variety of interesting and multi-faceted characters; Andrea King as the mysterious and possibly predatory woman, Wanda Hendrix, again, mysterious because one might be fooled by the other women with whom she associates herself, Thomas Gomez, the seemingly happy go lucky, friendly senor who has the horse carousel and of course the policeman from the U.S. and the gangster and his thugs. The darkness of the film and the sillouhetting of various shots add to the mystery surrounding this story. I think the most important thing that makes this story stand out is that you don't know throughout the whole movie which characters are trustworthy or untrustworthy. This movie is also a love story which makes it unique, as I can't remember any film-noirs that are love stories. Alas, the film will probably remain obscure until someone decides that it is time to make it available to the public on video. It is rarely seen on American Movie Classics.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Perplexing, convoluted film noir with a shell of a story.
mark.waltz2 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Having seen this many years ago and having been rather confused by it. I wondered if waiting years to see it again if it would come together for me. Unfortunately, it has not, becoming even more of a mystery than before. I wondered if the issues I had with it before were my issue, but ultimately, the conclusion that I came to is the fact that it strives for new wave artistry but simply ends up being pretentious. Robert Montgomery, so good on "Lady in the Lake", tried again in the film noir genre and managed to turn this into a cult classic. I am not a part of that cult.

Arriving by Greyhound in a border town during a fiesta, Montgomery finds intrigue in local corruption, finding an amigo on jolly Thomas Gomez and a pest in young Wanda Hendrix. Other corrupt characters give only moderate clues over what is going on, and it takes a lot of patience to get to the conclusion to really put it all together.

Andrea King plays one of the great femme fatales of all time, and where she is going remains an impressive mystery. A scene with villains beating up Gomez as children observe it from their seats on a twirling carousel, is one of the great visuals of the noir genre.

Perhaps the problem also lies in the setting. Rural border towns are creepy looking and dark at night and I really longed for a city setting to make this feel like a desolate area where occasional crowd scenes could bring on a flash of excitement. Montgomery is a rather cold, unemotional anti-war, with Hendrix following him around non- stop like some unwanted guardian angel.

Dry and humorless, this drags slightly and I kept longing for something to happen. Fred Clark, on his debut, makes an intriguing sleeve,leading him to a lengthy career of playing snarky WASPS. Some interesting photography gives the appropriate atmosphere, but overall, this is a highly overrated bore.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fascinating noir but ultimately unsatisfying...Bogart would have been perfect for the anti-hero...
Doylenf10 January 2004
ROBERT MONTGOMERY never seemed quite as comfortable in tough guy roles as someone like Humphrey Bogart was--and this is a role that would have been ideal for Bogart. Not to say that Montgomery isn't effective--he's especially good in the latter part of the story where he must stagger around after a brutal beating. His direction too has to be commended, taut and keeping the sense of imminent danger lurking in the shadows at all times.

He plays a typical film noir character, struggling to wrong a right in a world where he feels alienated and suspicious of everyone. But it's a little too much of a one note performance with a sneer behind every sarcastic comment and never letting us know what he is really all about. That becomes true of the other characters too. We are never told why Wanda Hendrix (as a blue-eyed Mexican girl) follows him around so worshipfully after he has some rude exchanges with her. We never fully know why Pablo takes to him so instantly, enough to bear a brutal beating to keep his whereabouts a secret. Nor do we know why Art Smith follows him around at a respectful distance and seems to serve as his conscience when some expository dialogue trys to shed light on their characters. But keeping these characters as an enigma is partly what makes the film so fascinating.

Even the femme fatale is kept at a shadowy distance and Andrea King makes her an interesting woman whom we know has an ulterior motive in wanting to help Montgomery. Some extra tension is derived from the scene where Pablo (Thomas Gomez with a heavy Spanish accent) is brutally beaten while children nearby ride a carousel but become aware of their dangerous surroundings in the midst of a joyful ride.

Robert Montgomery is only partly successful as the bluntly outspoken tough guy and therein lies one of the film's chief faults. Furthermore, the low-key lighting cannot disguise the fact that almost all of the film's settings have a stagebound look to them, even the haven that Pablo supplies and where the carousel rides are taken. Most of the exteriors have that soundstage look with a rather stylized seediness to replicate a small Mexican town. It's an artificiality that cannot be ignored when watching the film.

Thomas Gomez won a Supporting Role Oscar nomination for his colorful Pablo. His thick accent reminds me of Akim Tamiroff and the other cave dwellers in Hemingway's FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS. Gomez gives Tamiroff a run for his money.

Summing up: a fascinating but ultimately unsatisfying film noir with an ending involving the Mexican girl that can only cause speculation. Was her true motive revealed? The answer remains obscure.

I can only repeat: what a role this would have been for Bogart!!
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Unusual Film Noir
gavin69428 May 2015
In the border town of San Pablo, preparing for an annual 'Mexican Fiesta,' arrives Gagin (Robert Montgomery): tough, mysterious and laconic. His mission: to find the equally mysterious Frank Hugo (Fred Clark), evidently for revenge; or is it blackmail?

This film gets credit for being a film noir set not in a big city or in some dark alley, but in a smaller southwestern town. And yet, despite the setting, it is firmly in the film noir genre and not in the western genre. Quite impressive.

The story itself is pretty simple, but the characters are what make it great. Gagin is awesome, as is Hugo, but it is the FBI agent who makes it complete: cat versus mouse, or is it? Throw in the local peasant girl, and you have a well-rounded cast of characters.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed