Salome, Where She Danced (1945) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Camp movies are also art
howardeismanart6 February 2017
Okay, so this is a movie with a throw-away script, characters and situations profoundly unlikely, some very inept acting, and even a title which doesn't make sense. So what?

DeCarlo was gorgeous, Albert Dekker was the heavy. They, and everyone else in this movie who should have had an accent, made a valiant -and occasionally effective- attempt to sound foreign.

This is popcorn Saturday afternoon matinée art. It is meant to be a joyride on a merry-go- round. Don't criticize the painted horses because they don't look real. Okay, Yvonne wasn't much of a dancer, but she could dance well enough for grade school kids. The color was pretty good. There were impressive sets, a bit of outdoor action, plenty of extras, and even some how-to-live-life-right by that venerable Asian philosopher, Abner Biberman.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You are seeing it under wrong conditions
gthomp14 April 2004
I saw this in fall 1945> I had left ship on day war ended. We were in far reaches of Pacific and had not had a liberty or seen and spoken with a woman for over a year and a half. I flew to Honolulu for a school and was there for three weeks. Ship arrived and I rejoined it. Fueled and departed without touching shore. Sailors eager to get back to States and liberty and accompanying social life. The first night out the movie was Salome Where She Danced. The moans, and groans, and other manifestations of souls (and bodies) in torment would have amazed those of you who look at this movie in current times, under current circumstances.

I look at the movie now from time to time to savor the feeling of smugness I felt that night. I had had three weeks in Honolulu and so was perhaps less moved by the dance. I still look at it, though, from the experience of long deprivation.

I agree that much of the acting is deplorable, most of the plot, and all of the situations improbable. However, that dance is the whole reason for the show and in the fall of 1945 it was moving, gripping, and memorable.
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Salami, What She Ate....
mark.waltz19 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Where did she dance? Where did she eat? And did she eat the huge oyster from the shell she came out of for her glorious entrance? Poor Yvonne DeCarlo moved out of minor supporting roles for her first lead in this turkey of all turkeys that doesn't know whether it wants to be European romantic drama, swashbuckler, or western. In the 1971 Stephen Sondheim musical "Follies", DeCarlo sang "First you're another slow eyed vamp, then someone's mother, then you're camp". Well, the camp came first, and this is one where she should be finding veils to hide behind.

The plot line has nothing to do with the famous Biblical princess who asked for John the Baptist's head on a platter. Salome is a European dancer with a bad reputation who seduces a powerful Count (Kurt Katch), gets information for the other side of the war between Austria and Prussia, ends up in the wild west where she falls in love with a bandit (David Bruce), then back in Europe where the still western clad Bruce has a sword fight with the count over her affections.

This one rips out all the lousy dialog you can think of when it starts off on April 9, 1865 with a group of soldiers (Bruce included) who encounter General Lee (John Litel) right after the truce has been signed between him and Grant. Bruce still wants to fight the war; After all, he has known nothing but battle since the age of 16, and plans to continue to fight even though the war is basically over. Lee spouts some over-the-top philosophies and disappears on his merry way out of the film, but poor Bruce and a reporter (played by Rod Cameron) aren't so lucky. They've got another 85 minutes to go.

What starts off as unintentional camp turns into a major yawn fest with only several moments of eye-rolling humor. Everybody in the cast (which also includes Marjorie Rambeau as a saloon proprietor who humiliates herself with a hideous musical number, and Walter Slezak as a Russian nobleman also after DeCarlo) is directed to over-emphasize their dialog. The film is lovely to look at, and DeCarlo is exquisitely dressed. But attractive or not, when the plot simply rambles just everywhere and creates an instant distaste, the ultimate result is plain and simply a Danube that will leave you coldly blue.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kitsch Klassik
BobMason-231 January 1999
Much underrated camp movie on the level of Cobra Woman, etc. Photographic stills resemble Rembrandt prints. Sometimes subtle dialog and hidden literate touches found throughout.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Yvonne De Carlo's feature career gets off with a resounding clunk
DLewis11 November 2012
This movie is just plain bad; no story to speak of, hard to follow, no clear direction to the script or continuity. I've seen it, and I'm not sure what happens in it, except a lot of nothing. Yvonne De Carlo had appeared in shorts and small parts before this, and was a good bet to star in a feature owing to her striking beauty and vampish charm. But "Salome Where She Danced" is an embarrassing mediocrity and is certainly not "bad"in the entertaining sense of Ed Wood or others on Hollywood's third-tier. As a Universal Picture, this is actually a thoroughly failed first or second tier production, and all of its slickness and artificiality does not conceal the glaring reality that it has nothing going for it. It is not "colorized;" it's in genuine Technicolor,though even the handling of the color is flat and undynamic -- sand is light brown, and one comes away with the impression that there is an awful lot of sand in the film, and perhaps a tumbleweed or two. De Carlo struggles valiantly with this bottom-drawer material only to achieve the status of being the best thing about a movie that has nothing to offer on its own, and even that distinction is a stretch. She is lucky to have survived this feature, as other potential stars have had their careers sunk by far less than this.
4 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Salome Where She Danced
bellmasonry-13 August 2006
I just saw this movie for the first time ever and I liked it. Her dancing was very entertaining. I read somewhere that she got the part in this movie because she knew how to dance. The scenery was great too. Yvonne is such a talented woman and beautiful. WE laughed at the silly kissing scenes, but that is what is great about old movies! I grew up with her on The Munsters and I am enjoying watching her in her earlier movies. They may not all be the best out there but still worth watching to see her act and sing. I am slowly purchasing all her movies and watching them as I receive them. I have a large collection of her memorabilia.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst
aberlour368 March 2007
This is surely one of the worst films ever made and released by a major Hollywood studio. The plot is simply stupid. The dialog is written in clichés; you can complete a great many sentences in the script because of this. The acting is ridiculously bad, especially that of Rod Cameron. The "choreography" is silly and wholly unerotic. One can only pity the reviewer who saw 23-year-old Yvonne's dance as sexual; it's merely very bad choreography. The ballet scene in the film's beginning is especially ludicrous. If you are into bad movies and enjoy laughing at some of Hollywood's turkeys, this is for you. I bought the colorized version on VHS, making the movie even worse. Yvonne's heavy makeup, when colored, has her looking like a clown all the time. And she's the best part of this film. What a way to launch a career.
4 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
THE camp classic of all time
ronnmullen25 October 2002
Miss DeCarlo's starring debut has everything the writers could come up with -- from the Franco-Prussian War to the US Civil War, the great American West, San Francisco in its heyday, ballet, opera, vaudeville, stage coach bandits, and a Chinese junk. Just when you thought the plot couldn't get any screwier, it does. It's magnificent, taken tongue in cheek. DeCarlo's character (here called Anna Marie -- NOT Salome, that's the role she dances) is loosely based on the career of the notorious Lola Montez, who was the mistress of the King of Prussia and caused a revolution when he gave her the crown jewels. She did escape to the American west. There is a town in Arizona called "Salome, Where She Danced," based on the historical fact that Lola Montez did dance the role of Salome there. StageCoach Cleve and the Russian nobleman who fall under her charms are not historically accurate, nor I assume is the Chinese wise man with the Scottish accent -- but it is one of my favorite all time camp classics and DeCarlo is breathtakingly beautiful throughout.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Reply To comment by "aberlour36"
Nemesis7293-127 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"This is surely one of the worst films ever made and released by a major Hollywood studio. The plot is simply stupid. The dialog is written in clichés; you can complete a great many sentences in the script because of this. The acting is ridiculously bad, especially that of Rod Cameron. The "choreography" is silly and wholly unerotic. One can only pity the reviewer who saw 23-year-old Yvonne's dance as sexual; it's merely very bad choreography. The ballet scene in the film's beginning is especially ludicrous. If you are into bad movies and enjoy laughing at some of Hollywood's turkeys, this is for you. I bought the colorized version on VHS, making the movie even worse. Yvonne's heavy makeup, when colored, has her looking like a clown all the time. And she's the best part of this film. What a way to launch a career."

Above is the "review", such as it is, by aberlour36. If this commenter, and the word IS commenter...NOT commentator, wishes his or her comments to be taken seriously then they should have taken the simple, elementary trouble to discover that "Salome Where She Danced" was FILMED IN COLOR....Technicolor, to be exact. It was NOT computer colorized. I find it virtually impossible to have any respect or serious consideration for the "critical" and "artistic" opinions of someone who literally cannot tell the difference between a 40's Universal picture in Technicolor....some of the most intensely bright and gorgeous true Technicolor of all....and the visual horror that is computer colorization. If this glaring, visual fact is not readily apparent then this commenter's taste in general must be called into SERIOUS question. That I disagree with the review otherwise, goes without saying.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Breakthrough role for Yvonne De Carlo
jarrodmcdonald-124 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Walter Wanger produced this western melodrama at Universal. Not only did he have his wife Joan Bennett under contract, he also had Susan Hayward and Julie London under contract. Either those women passed up the opportunity to play the lead in SALOME, or else Wanger didn't think they quite fit the role. Whatever the reason for their non-participation, he still needed to find the right star, so he launched a nationwide search.

The search occurred over a two-month period in the summer of 1944. Photographers across the U. S and Canada were invited to submit pictures of the most beautiful women they'd photographed (obviously, movie talent or experience acting on stage was not necessary). Over 20,000 images were submitted. Wanger and his staff reviewed the submissions and were able to narrow it to down to eight hopefuls by August.

Meanwhile Yvonne De Carlo had been working under a contract at Paramount. She racked up quite a few credits at the studio in bit parts, but when she was up for a major role, she lost out to Dorothy Lamour. Frustrated by her experience at Paramount, she was ready to bail on the studio and find opportunities elsewhere in Hollywood. Having heard about Wanger's search for the perfect female to play Salome, she decided this would be the part that would put her on the cinematic map.

With help from friends in her native Canada, a campaign was launched to get Wanger to consider De Carlo for the role. Wanger was ultimately persuaded, and he cast her in August '44. A few of the other hopefuls, including Barbara Bates, were cast as background dancers.

With De Carlo now in place, and under a new contract at Universal (where she'd go on to make quite a few hit films), Wanger was ready to finalize the script with the production code people. However, the production code office had two major objections, and the script was not finalized until mid-September. One objection involved a reference to the story of Salome in the Bible; and another objection involved one of the male characters not getting punished for his criminal deeds. After Wanger and his writers made changes, the script received approval, and they could start filming.

Cast as De Carlo's leading man was Universal contractee Rod Cameron. He was a fellow Canadian, and they shared chemistry, though at 6'5" Cameron towered over De Carlo. He had been making B westerns at the studio and was just the right sort of rugged and working class he-man that would counterbalance De Carlo's brand of exotic femininity. They'd go on to make FRONTIER GAL a short time later and reunite for RIVER LADY in 1948.

The story for SALOME WHERE SHE DANCED is somewhat intriguing. De Carlo plays a Viennese dancer and actress inspired by Lola Montes who arrives in America and falls for a bandit (David Bruce). The rogue reminds her of a former love, but his outlaw exploits are more important to him than she is.

Of course the relationship doesn't work out. Meanwhile, Cameron who plays a newspaper man, seems to be keeping on eye on what's happening...probably because he's developing feelings for De Carlo. He follows her on to the next engagement.

A highlight of the film is a memorable dance that De Carlo performs during a production of Salome in an Arizona town. Her attractive costume and exciting movements on stage make her quite popular with the locals.

She and her troupe move on to San Francisco where a colonel (Walter Slezak) becomes smitten with her. At the same time a Prussian nobleman (Albert Dekker) wants to take her back with him to Europe. Ultimately, she is able to avoid these entanglements with Cameron's help.

The film has just the right blend of over-the-top escapist entertainment. De Carlo is a rousing success on screen. She would become one of Universal's top moneymakers in the second half of the 1940s and early 1950s. Later, she went back to Paramount to make THE TEN COMMANDMENTS in 1956 for Cecil DeMille. That was validation; she had proven herself as a bonafide Hollywood star.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
At Least DeCarlo Survived
dougdoepke2 August 2021
Weird pastiche that comes across more like a collection of movie scraps than a coherent storyline. Certainly Wanger and Universal spared no expense in glamorizing Salome (DeCarlo), or mobbing up the crowd scenes, or spreading on the Technicolor. Nonetheless, the screenplay makes no sense except as a vehicle for the modestly talented, black-haired beauty. As I recall, few movie plots I've suffered through are as hopelessly broken as this one. Then too, if the pointless narrative weren't enough, where did they recruit the lame David Bruce as Salome's love interest; he's about as expressive as a guy with face in a freezer. Too bad sexy Salome's romantic clinches couldn't inject some life into him. Small wonder his career went nowhere. No need to go on. Some take the lame results as camp; I take it as a plain bad movie. Good thing DeCarlo not only survived, but flourished.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You have to see it to believe it.
searchanddestroy-113 April 2023
This is one of the most incredible, unbelievable film that I have ever seen. Kitsch, of course, certainly, totally crazy, a mix up of western spy, historical, adventure movie with the support in the cast of the flaming Yvonne de Carlo as a kind of Mata Hari character, involved with Bismarck's army. Albert Dekker is excellent here in a German villain role, and Rod Cameron also at his place co starring the great De Carlo. Many folks say that Charles Lamont was the reaf film maker of only one film, this very one, his forever masterpiece. Many audiences will despise this, because it looks like anything, and that's precisely for this reason that I love it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Salome, Where She Flopped
x-lechard22 November 2003
Ms. De Carlo did some great films - "Criss Cross", "Band of Angels" - but her acting skills never had anything to do with it. Both films I mentioned had her teaming with excellent directors and leads who made up for her limited range. One of the (many) problems with "Salome" is that De Carlo is on her own, neither director nor actors being good enough to provide any supply. David Bruce in particular is so non-expressive he makes Sylvester Stallone looking like Alec Guinness. His love scenes with De Carlo are ridiculous, as he conveys as much love feeling as he had a cow in his arms. So sad, for a better acting *might* have made the screenplay a pill easier to swallow. It takes much humor or abnegation to believe in such a mess of a story, blending Lee and Bismarck, Prussia and West America, and filled with implausible characters and situations. I guess some viewers may find it funny, but I found it simply dull and boring. The only good thing about this flick is its looks: photography is splendid, worthy of a better material, and Ms. De Carlo is really beautiful - if not in an emotive way.

Bombs like this one belong to Golden Age of Hollywood as well as celebrated masterpieces, so one has to accept their existence. But it is not a reason to waste one's time watching them.
9 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed