Escape from Crime (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
One of the best "B" thrillers ever made!
JohnHowardReid29 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Producer: William Jacobs. Copyright 23 July 1942 by Warner Bros Pictures, Inc. A Warner Bros-First National picture. New York opening at the Palace on the bottom half of a double bill with Here We Go Again: 11 October 1942. U.S. release: 25 July 1942. Australian release: 6 December 1945 (sic). 51 minutes. Censored to slightly less than 50 minutes in Australia.

SYNOPSIS: Ex-convict newspaper photographer is persecuted by a suspicious detective.

COMMENT: One of the best "B" thrillers ever made, this one's a re-make of the 1933 James Cagney starrer, Picture Snatcher. Doubtless stock footage is used here but it's not all that easy to detect because James Van Trees has skilfully attuned his camerawork to the lighting, grading and contrast of the original's Sol Polito.

The present script is certainly taut and rapid-paced. With the help of an extremely competent cast, including Jackie Gleason as a convict, D. Ross Lederman has directed in an astonishingly fast and inventive manner. Studded with thrilling action sequences, the picture develops into a thrillingly spectacular climax.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Well Above-Average 1940s Crime Drama
Handlinghandel20 November 2006
This is not a film noir. It has a dark side and many of the components of film noir. But it's a standard crime story, exceptionally well executed. (Oh, no pun intended, as it involves prisons!) Apart from Jackie Gleason in a relatively minor role, the only recognizable player is Julie Bishop. She's very appealing as the devoted wife of a man we see being paroled as the picture begins.

He doesn't have things easy. Old friends he'd prefer to have left behind keep turning up. A cop is keeping a partially benevolent but steady eye on him.

This stars and is generally populated with minor Warner brothers performers. There is no really big name, though handsome Richard Travis was possibly being groomed as one. Or observed to see if he could become one.

He didn't make it but the movie hangs together very well. It's short and tightly written, filmed, and edited.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A lot of plot for 51 minutes
blanche-226 March 2015
Richard Travis and Julie Bishop star in a short B, "Escape from Crime," a Warners film from 1942.

Travis plays a parolee who gets photos of a bank robbery and parlays it into a job on a newspaper. He later gets into trouble when his boss wants him to worm his way into the prison and photograph the execution of one of his old crime buddies.

It's very hard to judge these films - they were probably made in an afternoon. You'll see lots of familiar faces, as most if not all of these actors later went on to work in television.

Jackie Gleason has a tiny role. Needless to say, he made it bigger than all of them.

"Escape from Crime" moves fast and has a convoluted plot.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Programmer of the Period
dougdoepke12 March 2009
No need to recap the already-reviewed plot. The movie is a good example of an assembly line product that studios rushed into production for undemanding wartime audiences at a time when they were crowding theaters in record numbers. The film itself may be unmemorable, but the results still show slick professionalism of the studio system (here, Warner Bros.). It's also a chance for a newcomer like Travis to get needed exposure. He's Hollywood handsome, performs capably enough, but leaves no lasting impression and is a good example of an actor whose real medium turned out to be TV. Ditto comedian Jackie Gleason and William Hopper of old Perry Mason show in a bit part. In fact this is precisely the level of entertainment that would later transition to TV without missing a beat.

In passing—was there any cop during this period who wasn't Irish. My guess is that the stereotype was a safe and popular one because it raised no controversial connotations, unlike, say, a German or French cop. Also, both shootouts are rather conspicuously overdone. Note in the hotel room how the windowpane manages not to shatter despite fusillade after fusillade of police bullets. I suspect this was an effort to generate an appearance of more action in a crime drama that's otherwise somewhat short of the norm. Anyway, the 53 minutes remains a good example of routine bottom-of-the-bill entertainment, circa 1942.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The photographer
jotix10023 July 2005
Half way through this movie, we kept thinking about a similarity with another one we had seen recently. Later on, checking upon it, we realized this was a remake of "Picture Snatcher", a James Cagney vehicle. Further checking revealed both films are based on Danny Ahern's story.

"Escape from Crime" doesn't work as well as the previous movie, but for a 51 minutes feature, it gets to the basics right away. As directed by D Ron Ledermann, this B movie packs a lot in such a small format.

Best of all was the cast. Richard Travis, Julie Bishop, Jackie Gleason, Frank Wilcox, Charles Wilson, Anne Corcoran and Ruth Ford, as the molls of the gang members.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fast moving (short) remake of Picture Snatcher (1933) is engaging
jacobs-greenwood18 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Fast moving, relatively short film (based on Picture Snatcher (1933), but actually quite different) with lots of excitement to keep one engaged in the action.

A guy (Richard Travis), who took prison mug shots, gets out of prison, promising not to come back (or at least get caught again) to his police nemesis (Wade Boteler), who he runs into on his way out the door. The guy is picked up by one of his old gang, and it appears that he'll soon be back in trouble. He is taken to the house of his ex-girl (Julie Bishop), only to find that he's the father of a baby with her. This convinces him he must go straight. After struggling to find a job as a photographer, he's in the right place at the right time to snap pictures of a bank robbery (by his old gang, it turns out) in progress. He is instantly hired by the newspaper which had turned him down previously (they were not willing to hire an ex-con). His old police nemesis is suspicious of how he happened to be at the bank around the time of the robbery to get the pictures and decides to visit him at his house. His best buddy from the old gang, who was hurt in the robbery, shows up at his house about the same time (as the cop) needing help. The ex-con helps him, using his own baby as a decoy to convince the cop he's gone straight. The cop understands, apologizes, but then lets on that he saw blood on the carpet, saying "you should take care of that, else someone's liable to think you were involved in the robbery". The ex-con makes good as a newspaper photographer, earning a raise, but is then asked to take picture of his buddy getting "fried" in the electric chair (for another raise and $1,000).

He agrees, using the cop to gain access to the prison and sneak the illegal picture. When the cop finds out, he is furious and apprehends the ex-con. However, while taking him in, the cop learns that the ex-con's old gang (headed by Paul Fix) is hold up in a building nearby and goes to assist in the "shootout" (which is laughable, at best - windows aren't hit by police bullets, don't fall apart when they are;-). The ex-con assists in capturing his old gang and is pardoned for his help, thanks to the cop he helped credit with the collar.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
So what would you do for $1,000?
Jim Tritten20 August 2002
Fast-paced crime drama loosely based upon James Cagney's `Picture Snatcher (1933).' Richard Travis plays a photographer ex-con trying to go straight. He lucks out by being at the scene of a bank robbery, takes photos of the shooting of a cop, and is rewarded by a job in the professional paparazzi. When offered a raise, a $1,000 bonus, and a writing assignment (vice getting fired) to take pictures of his old gangster friend's execution, our hero talks his parole officer into getting him into prison where he takes the picture. On the way out, he is discovered and has to struggle to get the film to his editor. En-route back to prison for violating parole, our hero rescues his captor who has become embroiled in a shoot-out with another gangster from Travis' old days.

OK, this plot is somewhat convoluted, let alone trying to do it all in 51 minutes on what is obviously a very low budget. Not much time for character development and the cast comes and goes with great speed. Continuity is provided by the interactions of Travis and Wade Boteler who plays Police Lieutenant Riff Malone (a.k.a. `Irish' and `Lucky'). The policeman alternates between hounding the ex-con and supporting his escape from crime. Boteler had nearly 400 films to his credit – typical of a number of the cast members. The `Great One' Jackie Gleason has a small part as a con in the beginning of the movie but is never seen again.

Themes include: crime does not pay; the inability to get a job after being released from prison (Travis was not guilty of the first crime); overcoming adversity to do the right thing (the hero must and does get rewarded for his efforts); and loyalty to friends vs. duties to family. Not too bad to try to do all this in 51 minutes. Perhaps a little longer might have been better.

One good scene uses shadows to depict strapping a man into the electric chair.

The film is worth seeing if only to witness 12 shots fired into what obviously is a bulletproof trash can – not harming our hero hiding behind. They don't make them like this anymore.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another short but tight Warners "B" quickie
fredcdobbs513 March 2015
Richard Travis is an ex-con who gets a job as a newspaper photographer, and rises to the top of his profession until his past comes back to put him in a predicament that could endanger his parole. Director D. Ross Lederman turns out another one of his patented fast-paced actioners, with vicious gangsters, tough cops, hard dialogue, sassy gun molls, blasting guns, car chases and everything else that made these Warners "B"s so great. Travis, who was groomed to be a star, had the looks and the talent to do it but never managed to break out of the "B" niche. The rest of the cast is populated with the great faces and voices of some of the Warners "stock company"--Frank Wilcox, Wade Boteler, John Hamilton, John Harmon, Paul Fix and Jackie Gleason early in his career in a small role. The terrific Julie Bishop plays Travis' devoted wife. The film is a remake of James Cagney's 1933 "Picture Snatcher" and uses some footage from it, but while this picture may be low-budget, it's definitely not low-quality. It moves like lightning and is an enjoyable example of the kinds of films that "they just don't make anymore".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
At blinding speed
bkoganbing19 October 2019
Poor Jackie Gleason who thought I'm sure he was getting a break in Escape From Crime. But all we see of the Great One is a few minutes at the beginning of the film before Richard Travis gets his parole.

Travis gets a parole with the usual restrictions. When he gets out he discovers he's a father.. Travis, Julie Bishop, and their kid plan to settle down once he can get a job as a photographer a trade he learned in stir.

He does get one with Frank Wilcox's paper, but he runs into his old hoodlum pals who keep turning up.

The film moves at blinding speed to cover up all that was lost in the editing. Warner Brothers used a meat cleaver approach.

Sub par product from the brother's B picture unit.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pictures at an Execution
wes-connors14 March 2015
Freshly paroled from prison, photographer Richard Travis (as "Red" O'Hara) immediately goes to see his estranged wife Julie Bishop (as Molly). Hearing a man in the house, Mr. Travis believes Ms. Bishop is a "two-timing little twit" and plans to shoot the lovers. Travis changes his mind when Bishop surprises him with a red-haired baby son. Hoping to support his new family, Travis tries to get a job at "The Illustrated News" with news editor Frank Wilcox (as Cornell). They won't hire an ex-con, but "go-getter" Travis delivers exclusive photos of a bank robbery to the paper and is hired as staff photographer...

Going straight is difficult due to Travis' friendships with underworld types, like Rex Williams (as "Slim" Dugan). Even worse, Travis is assigned to enter his old prison and illegally photograph an electric chair execution. Arched acting and brisk direction, by D. Ross Lederman, make this revision of "Picture Snatcher" (1933) play nicely. The original story suggested sex between two of its stars and an independent, female co-worker; obviously, this was abandoned. Don't miss the opening minutes, or you won't see future "Honeymooners" TV comedy legend Jackie Gleason (as "Screwball" Evans).

****** Escape from Crime (7/25/42) D. Ross Lederman ~ Richard Travis, Julie Bishop, Frank Wilcox, Rex Williams
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Muddled Mess of a Plot
bkoganbing22 July 2005
Richard Travis is a convict just paroled, his former arresting officer is believing he won't stay out of jail. Travis meets up with his wife, Julie Bishop, and finds there's a small bundle of joy added to his family.

Of course his old criminal pals want Travis to rejoin them, but he gets a job as a newspaper photographer. From there if you want to see this film any further, you will go into an unbelievable plot line and will finish this film shaking your head.

Now I do realize that this is a B film with only a 51 minute running time. But this kind of film if possible ought to be given a Grade F.

Yet it contains one superstar. Jackie Gleason has a bit role that if you blink you'll miss. This was not something I'm sure the Great One was especially proud to have on his list of credits.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Get Hep To The Clowns Around Here"
davidcarniglia16 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Got to like a movie with characters named Slim, Red, Buff, Dude, and Screwball. In fact, the dialogue has all the '40s lingo down--with its very apt staccato delivery; "Ya big lug" and "frying the pants off" being particular gems. Red O'Hara (Richard Travis) has to get "wise to himself" to fit back into society after getting out of "stir". The premise is original in that it's a random crime that both gets the protagonist back into his newspaper job and messes him up with hoods again. Photographing his friend's execution is a uniquely macabre 'set-up'.

Travis's range is fairly wide--his Red is a regular guy, mixing with cops, criminals, and his wife and son with appropriate nuance. The little bit where he improvises a bunny puppet to entertain his son is pretty cool. His news photos make a great action-filled montage. Speaking of action--the execution deal itself is straight horror--with shadow-figures on the wall in the tomb-like room. What drives the plot isn't just crime--it's sensationalist journalism. Red was pressured to photograph the execution at the risk of losing his job; his boss just assumes that he can make Red do anything for money.

Until the very last scene, Red is manipulated by all sides, never able to let his guard down. His constant sparring with the cops Biff (Wade Boteler) and Rafferty (John Hamilton) highlights their willingness to believe in him without directly compromising themselves. That things do work out for Red seems almost as much a lucky break as the result of his genuine efforts to rehabilitate himself. That's what gives Escape From Crime a touch of film noir--showing the power of fate; and life as a (sometimes deadly) game. Red puts on that he's gone back to the dark side during the climactic shoot-out scene, but quickly turns the tables again to gain the advantage on Slim and Dude. Even the happy ending begins as a ruse, Red thinking he's still in hot water with the warden over the execution photo.

The pacing is probably the best thing here; it keeps the interest level high and adds to the built-in sense of drama. I really don't find anything much to complain about. Sure, the big shoot-out leaves us many bullet holes short of authenticity, but after the cops seem to miss everything, they start hitting everything. Works out o.k. Very entertaining overall, worth watching for the action alone. 8/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
B-Movie Making at its Shortest and Best
LeonLouisRicci23 September 2014
Ultra-Prolific Director Lederman was Known for His Kinetic Pace and Under Budget Productions. This is a Remake of the James Cagney's Pre-Code Exploitation Movie, Picture Snatcher (1932).

Things Develop at a Frenzied and Breath Taking Pace as Our Hero is Framed. Paroled from Prison and Unable to Find Work because he is an Ex-Con (in typical WB social commentary), His Fate Determined by being at the Right Place All the Time as He Snaps Photos of a Bank Robbery and becomes an Award Winning Professional Shutterbug Always being on the Scene to Shoot a Scene of Incredible Drama.

As Fate, Yes Again, would have it, the Old Gang that Set Him Up are the Criminals and this Creates a Problem for the Trying to Go Straight Husband and Daddy. Trying to be a Family Man is Not as Easy as it Seems and He is Thrust into a Bad Situation. He Makes the Best of It by Agreeing to Film His Pal being Executed in the Electric Chair.

This One is Filled to the Brim with this and that and the Final Shootout is a Frenzied, also Fate Filled Finale, that is a Kinetic Gun Battle Free for All that is B-Movie Making at its Best. There is No Time to Think in the Running Time of Just Over Fifty Minutes. Yes, thats 50 Minutes.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
WAY better than it's given credit for
canadian_pontiac_guy16 April 2019
That sums it up. Yes, fast paced, but I don't believe it has a convoluted plot. Definitely have to pay attention though !
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed