Trade Winds (1938) Poster

(1938)

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Movie From Home Movies
bkoganbing11 May 2011
Several years before anyone thought of the film Trade Winds, director Tay Garnett did a round the world tour and took a camera crew with him. They shot miles of beautiful travelogue type footage and Garnett had it in his mind to use it. According to the Citadel Film Series book The Films of Fredric March, Garnett sold the idea to independent producer Walter Wanger. Who thereupon commissioned a story to be written around these films and naturally it would be starring his wife Joan Bennett. All that background you see in Trade Winds is what Garnett shot years earlier.

Trade Winds is a strange film it can't quite make up its mind to be a mystery, comedy, or drama it truly defies classification. One thing we do know is that right away we're given information regarding the forensics that Joan Bennett is innocent. If she had not run, but stayed behind she'd have known right away and we'd have had no film.

But run she does and private detective Fredric March is put on her trail. He sure needs the money as well as he and secretary Ann Sothern owe a lot of bills.

The weakness of the plot is made up for a lot by the supporting performances of both Ann Sothern and Ralph Bellamy. Sothern is not in the tradition of private eye secretaries like Effie in The Maltese Falcon. She turns out to be just as good a gumshoe as March and she's a person of shifting loyalties.

Which is unlike Ralph Bellamy who might easily qualify for being the dumbest cop the movies ever portrayed. I could have seen him being commandant of the Police Academy forty years later. He's so earnest in such a Dudley Doo-Right manner he's positively hilarious. Sothern and Bellamy really do carry this film.

March is a charming rascal and Bennett a beautiful and vulnerable victim, but if you watch Trade Winds I know you'll enjoy Sothern and Bellamy most of all.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Trade Winds" stirs barely a good breeze...
Doylenf11 May 2011
Despite contributions to the script by witty Dorothy Parker, TRADE WINDS is tough going for most of its running time. JOAN BENNETT plays a woman running away from a murder charge who is trailed to exotic locations by FREDRIC MARCH and RALPH BELLAMY, detectives hot on her trail.

March falls in love with her and faces the dilemma of turning her in to the authorities, while Bellamy finds romance with wise-cracking secretary ANN SOTHERN. That's about it, for the plot. The suspense lies in learning when and how the Bennett/March romance will flounder and come to some sort of resolution for the final reel.

Director Tay Garnett makes heavy use of his home movies for all of the process shots used extensively throughout filming. The effects cheapen the images on screen so that never for a moment do you feel that these events are taking place in actual locales, only in front of a process screen full of faded images.

Silliness of the comedy interludes are imposed on any dramatic elements the story has, making for an uneven mixture of comedy and drama.

Joan Bennett's transformation to a stunning brunette changed the course of her career as she goes from blonde to brunette to avoid capture. It's the only interesting aspect of the photoplay for this viewer.

Performances are competent with Sothern and Bellamy vying for attention in some amusing byplay that at least gives some indication of Dorothy Parker's contribution. But generally speaking, the comic moments are strained and appear more foolish than witty. Revelation of the events surrounding Bennett's murder charge strikes a false note for the ending.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Joan Bennett becomes a blond
blanche-219 May 2011
"Trade Winds" is a comedy-drama starring Joan Bennett, Frederic March, Ralph Bellamy, and Ann Sothern, directed by Tay Garnett.

Bennett plays Kay Kerrigan, a young woman who is out to avenge her sister's death and goes after her sister's ex-boyfriend (Sidney Blackmer). When Kay says she wishes she could shoot him, he hands her a gun and she shoots. Then she starts running for her life. To change her appearance, she dyes her hair dark. This turned out to be a boon for Bennett, who took on an exciting new look with the dark hair.

The police send one of their own after her, Ben Blodgett (Ralph Bellamy) and one of their ex-own, the womanizing, slippery Sam Wye (March), now a detective who spends a lot of time coming on to women. He's also romancing his secretary Jean (Ann Sothern). He agrees to search for Kay and manages to get away from from Jean and hop a boat. He gets a line on Kay, and when Jean next appears, she's an assistant to Kay. Then Sam finds out there's a $100,000 award on Kay's head. Small problem - he falls madly in love with Kay.

Fun comedy that slows up in the middle, with good performances by a relaxed March, a very funny Sothern, a lovely Bennett, and Bellamy as an overblown police detective. Not the best, but not bad - except for some of the process shots.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beautiful land of long ago
kmk-322 July 2002
Was there ever a more relaxed, charming rogue than Frederic March? He would have been a perfect James Bond, had the role been available to him in the '30s. As it is, he made do spectacularly with this one: he's Sam Wye, a former SFPD detective, hired to find and bring back the luminous Joan Bennett, who's suspected of murdering Sidney Blackmer... When her car goes into the Bay, she swims ashore and goes on the run... The action roves as the trade winds of the title, straying from the piers of the city by the Bay to Honolulu, Singapore, Tokyo, Hanoi, and Colombo, Ceylon. Ralph Bellamy,side-hick to March, sez: "Colombo? I thought that was in Ohio..." Ann Sothern is glamorous, and Joan Bennett sizzles. This is the movie in which she dyed her hair black -- and then kept it dark for the next 50 years...leaving the blonde Bennett roles to sister Constance. As a glimpse of pre-War Asia, and an insight into the world before terrorism, this is a charming and lovely memory. You'll yearn for the time when cruise attire was more than sweatsuits and sneakers...and all this with dialog by Dorothy Parker!
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Joan Changes Her Hair and Another Bellamy Jewel of an Idiot
theowinthrop12 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
TRADE WINDS is supposed to be a film starring Fredric March and Joan Bennett, and certainly they get most of the film's major scenes. But while March was a good actor in comedy (NOTHING SACRED and I MARRIED A WITCH show that) his "Sam Wye" is snowed under by his three co-stars, Bennett, Ann Southern, and Ralph Bellamy - in particular Ralph Bellamy for his performance as "Ben Blodgett" the assistant to March on this case.

Bennett made film history here for a film trick that was the reverse of her sister Constance's trick four years earlier in MOULIN ROUGE. There Connie had to play dual roles as Franchot Tone's wife (a brunette) and a French entertainer named "Raquel" (a blonde). For the part of the wife Connie had to have her natural blonde hair dyed black (but at the conclusion, supposedly wearing her film's natural color dyed "blonde", she is wearing her hair blonde. Here fellow blonde sister Joan (for reasons of the plot) changed her hair to black as a disguise. But the new hairstyle found favor with the public. Up to 1938 Constance Bennett was the better regarded (as a film star) of the two sisters. When the public saw Joan as a brunette she looked a bit like Hedy Lamarr, and got more attention. So Joan remained a film brunette for the rest of her career (including the series of great films directed by Fritz Lang like SCARLET STREET, and the films with Spencer Tracy FATHER OF THE BRIDE and FATHER'S LITTLE DIVIDEND).

TRADE WINDS is about a murder, and the leading suspect is Bennett. She flees and is crossing the Pacific with pal Southern. But they are being pursued by March, a detective who is known for his brains, his lack of ethics, and his chasing women. In a kind of twist to the plot strands in ONE WAY PASSAGE, March is determined to catch Bennett, but is falling for her. Soon he begins to wonder if he should let her escape. Bellamy (who for all his marvelous thick-headedness respects March's detective abilities) is appalled and starts working against him. Of course that is not much of a problem. Southern starts interfering with Bellamy and a second romance begins.

SPOILER COMING UP:

March does bring in Bennett, who faces trial and possible execution in California for the murder. While March re-evaluates the evidence to see if she really was responsible, she is visited in prison by Bellamy and Southern who try to comfort her. Bellamy is fine form saying, "Don't worry Miss Kerrigan. In the entire history of California jurisprudence only five women have been executed. FIENDS IN HUMAN FORM MA'AM!!" You can imagine how Bennett reacts to that comment (Southern trying to shut him up).

Bless the film gods for giving us Bellamy and his array of choice boobs!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Do you mind if I show you how it ends?"
classicsoncall19 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
If you were paying attention during the early part of the movie, there's a major tip-off that Kay Kerrigan (Joan Bennett) didn't really kill Thomas Bruhme II (Sidney Blackmer), but not for lack of trying. She shot him in the chest, but the bullet that killed him went to the base of his skull. But if the authorities had left it at that, there would have been no story. So instead, we have a globetrotting tale in which detective Sam Wye (Fredric March) chases lovely Kay Kerrigan from country to country with more than a little romance on his mind when he catches up with her.

The main event is almost upended entirely by the presence of Sam's sidekick Ben Blodgett. I've never seen Ralph Bellamy in a more thankless role, as he layers on more ham than a deli sandwich. When he connects with Sam's secretary, Jean Livingstone (Ann Sothern), they form a second romantic pairing in the picture, more by accident than intentional, since starting out, Jean had the hooks out for her boss. For his part, Sam was an unabashed playboy who never met a dame he couldn't woo until the next one came along.

Though credibility is stretched throughout the picture, it's still a fun outing keeping tabs on the characters and marveling at the silliness of it all, especially Blodgett's complete ineffectiveness. He would have given Leslie Nielsen's Lieutenant Drebin a run for his money. I'm not convinced Kay Kerrigan would have gotten away scot-free with the Bruhme shooting since she did attempt to harm him, even if it was a blank placed in her gun. Which is another little discrepancy in the story, which if you have a keen eye, will jump right out at you when the whole thing is over.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Garnett, but Not a Diamond
duke102928 January 2014
"Trade Winds" has some enjoyable moments. This Tay Garnett-directed independent feature has the beautiful and talented Joan Bennett as a murderess on the run in the Orient pursued by a skirt-chasing former policeman played by a very miscast Fredric March. The film veers from whodunit, to travelogue, to screwball comedy, to romance, to courtroom drama without much consistency. Because the major emphasis is on comedy and romance, the film needs the versatility of a Fred MacMurray in the lead. Although a fine actor, March is out of his element in a role that requires a lighter touch.

The usually reliable Ralph Bellamy, who excelled as the proverbial light comic "other man" in classics like "His Girl Friday," "The Awful Truth," and "Brother Orchid," ends up as an oafish buffoon of a policeman of the type often played by Edgar or Tom Kennedy. His performance clashes with March's and at times he seems out of an alternative universe. Although Ann Sothern has a very enjoyable drunk scene, she's underutilized, and the usually reliable Thomas Mitchell is given little to do but growl as a police commissioner... wasted in a role than would have usually gone to a William Frawley.

The film's inconsistencies are likely the fault of writer/director Tay Garnett, who had a lengthy but inconsistent career resume' with at least one masterpiece ("The Postman Always Rings Twice") to his credit. He did helm some films with similar elements to "Trade Winds": "One Way Passage" with Powell and Francis, "Seven Sinners" with Dietrich and Wayne, and "China Seas" with Gable and Harlow, but unfortunately Garnett never developed a consistent style, and by the 1950s he was directing TV Western series episodes like "Death Valley Days" and "Bonanza". With a steadier hand like a Howard Hawks at the helm, and more appropriate cast choices "Trade Winds" may have been a minor classic, but now it's just a curiosity. By the way, two interesting sidebars: Dorothy Parker (of Algonquin Round Table fame) was a collaborator on the script and the enigmatic Dorothy Comingore appears briefly here (under the name Linda Winters) several years before her triumph in "Citizen Kane."
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Trade Winds- Blows Hot and Cold ***
edwagreen16 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The film can be an enigma as well as perplexing. It starts off with Joan Bennett,a socialite, discovering that her sister has committed suicide. She goes to the boyfriend of the deceased, a cad played by Sidney Blackmer and she proceeds to blast him. Fleeing the scene she is chased around the globe by detective Frederic March and his assistant Ralph Bellamy.

Believe it or not, Ann Sothern, March's wily secretary steals every scene she is in. She really displays a depth of comedy that would follow her throughout her career. Of course, she was the right fit to portray a secretary, as she did that years later up in television's "Private Secretary."

The picture succumbs somewhat to the endless back and forth chase, and the inevitable March falling for the accused murderer. When he suddenly turns on her after they both flee, it appears that something is up, and that something is suddenly trying to exonerate Bennett. This is not fully explained.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A major disappointment
mls418211 September 2022
Initially, I was excited to see a film with Joan Bennett I hadn't seen. She has always been a favorite for being a good actress, her strong and charming personality and of course her great looks. Ann Southern is another favorite for her great personality and comic flair. Frederic March and Ralph Bellamy are also favorites.

The great cast makes this film an even bigger disappointment. The thin script is stretched with dull filler. This film is basically a home movie of international travel with black and white photography not doing the locales justice.

I don't know what else I can add to get up to the required characters. As I said this is a terrible waste of good actors.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This review is all spoilers. Bewarned!
max von meyerling14 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is an amusing little trifle. No more or no less. A charming cast, a fast pace, snappy dialog, charming players, a very silly story and a naked and unexplained denouement. The film started with the footage Tay Garnett made during a round-the-world sail. Or at least as far as Bombay sail. What to do with this footage? Dorothy Parker and sometime husband Alan Campbell, and Frank Adams, an ex-reporter and music composer who co-wrote I Wonder Who's Kissing Her Now concocted a story about a classy broad who thinks she shot and killed a man and escapes San Francisco by going west to Hawaii, Japan, China, etc. She is being chased by the World's Greatest Detective, the dumbest flatfoot on the force who never-the- less is high ranking, and said detectives secretary. So you see the background shots are used as the backgrounds of all the places they go. Miss Parker is responsible for some mighty clever lines, lines which gave Ann Southern a whole career.

This was produced by independent producer Walter Wanger who released through United Artists. Wanger could do what he wanted and obtained the services of Frederick March who had previously acted in a Parker script A Star Is Born for independent producer David Selznick. March's agent was David's brother Myron. Joan Bennett was married to Walter Wanger and perhaps the most famous or even important aspect of this film is that Joan went brunette in this film and never went back. As they say. Ralph Bellamy was stuck in the middle of a career where he would get scripts to read in which characters were described as "Ralph Bellamy type". His name in the film "Blodgett" was the same as the want to be star in A Star is Born. Getting failed "B" actress Ann Southern from nowhere was brilliant. No doubt the 4' 11" Parker used the 5' 1" Southern as an avatar for her whit, especially her smart-woman-in-a- man's-world be-bop. Blodgett is a direct rip off of Shakespeare's Dogberry from Much Ado About Nothing (which might be a title suitable for this film). Sidney Blackmer is featured and appears in one scene and is out of there faster than you can say Janet Leigh. Tommy Mitchell is in two scenes, both shot on the same set, and is also featured. Wanger padding out the cast for the price of two days work.

The ending is maddening. The murder is revealed to prove Bennett's innocence in the first ten minutes but the film just goes on as if nobody heard. Of course in those days people didn't worry about such things as extradition or jurisdictions so our detectives go off in pursuit. The put-upon secretary goes on after them. March and Bennett fall in love and Bennett is betrayed and sent to trial. A trap is set for the real murderer based on the idea that they will be the people who don't show up at a party. Only they do show up at the party or else there wouldn't be a climax. The thing is the murderer, the backstory, the motive or even who these people are is never explained. I guess its not really important as the story skims along purely on the surface, sort of like the drama skims in front the back projections from Garnett's journey. Everybody, that is movie goers, knew the context of film conventions. They could connect the dots. At one point March buys a ticket from a cabin on a departing ship under the name Mr. & Mrs. Jones and Bellamy and Southern are tricked into taking it. So they decide to get married. A Dorothy Parker joke.

The sets are by Alexander Toluboff and a young Alexander Golitzen and the cinematography by the matchless Rudolph Maté. Garnett never made a stupid film or directed a bad scene so Wanger did his job correctly and hired the best people for his film.

I guess today the film from the journey is more valuable than the negative and rights to Trade Winds. It shows a world which no longer exists and that is priceless.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A waste of talent
planktonrules4 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This film begins with society girl, Kay Kerrigan (Joan Bennett), shooting a no-good rich guy for destroying her sister. She soon is on the run and leaves the US. Because the dead guy was very rich and had a well-connected family, they pay detectives to follow her around the globe to bring her to justice. One of them, Sam Wye (Frederic March) finds that instead of bringing her back, he's tempted to just take off with her. When she is caught, he acts like a heel to throw off suspicion and ends up capturing the real killers--even though this sure seems like we saw her kill the cad!

It's pretty amazing. You've got some fine actors (particular Frederic March and Ralph Bellamy) and yet here they look awful. I blame most of it on the dumb dialog but the direction certainly left a lot to be desired. Add to that an over-extensive use of badly realized rear projection, and you've got an amazingly disappointing film. Want an example of the bad dialog?

(talking about Colombo, Sri Lanka):"Colombo---that's in Ohio!"
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Why isn't Trade Winds available on DVD???
Glosie20001 December 2007
I first saw this movie as a teen eons ago while my parents were busy playing cards at the home of friends, and have loved it ever since. Since my last viewing was over 20 years ago, I would love to have this on DVD to enjoy it again! I love all the characters, and lovely Joan Bennett indeed looked SMASHING as a brunette, which she kept for the rest of her long career. Very appealing was the insouciance of Fredric March's character, the smart humor of bubbly Ann Sothern's part, and the determined dorkiness of Ralph Bellamy's eager beaver character plus an interesting and engaging story.

Let's get this released, people that have the say-so!
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cute Comedy.
rmax30482312 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Joan Bennett, a flaming platinum blond, is accused of murdering the scion of a rich California newspaper owner. The owner's name is Bruhm with an umlaut and sounds absolutely nothing like "William Randolph Hearst." Nevertheless, the murder puts the San Francisco Police Department in a tizzy.

The detective assigned to the case is the near-sighted and totally square Ralph Bellamy whose theories of the crime have the virtue of being consistently wrong. Bellamy doesn't drink, smoke, swear, or wear anything but neat tweeds and a boater. The police chief, Thomas Mitchell, having little confidence in Bellamy, also hires a private detective to work with him. The private detective is the suave Frederick March. It's always nice to see March in a white suit and pith helmet when he visits exotic places.

The pair of detectives, dogged by March's secretary, Ann Sothern, track Bennett all over Asia -- from Hawaii when it was still "T.H.", to Japan, to Shanghai, to Singapore, and finally Bombay. In each place, March pursues his quarry by getting to know the local belles, while Bellamy huffs and blows his cheeks with indignation. The sets are all in the studio but the rear projections are sometimes interesting. That Shanghai street manages to really look like the street that runs along the waterfront.

They catch up with Bennett somewhere along the way, but she's changed her hair color and Bellamy has no idea who she is, while March not only recognizes her but falls instantly in love with her, and the other way round. The romance is boring but the picaresque story has its slight charms.

Gee, this was shot in 1937 and Japan is still full of geisha girls. And Shanghai is not yet desolate. And Singapore is full of white guys in white suits, kind of running things.

Frederick March was always an underrated actor but I thought he was better in dramatic roles. Bennett -- well, I don't know where she picked up those faux English phones -- "I cahn't do it" -- when she was born just across the Hudson from New York.

Dorothy Comingore is buried somewhere in the cast. A few years later she was to make another movie about the death of an important newspaperman, in which she played Wife Number Two, Mrs. Charles Foster Kane.

Dorothy Parker is listed among the writers but she must have done it for the paycheck, or during off moments while visiting Robert Benchley in Los Angeles, because the script has few genuine tag lines and no acid or sophistication. Well, the dialog does give Ann Sothern a couple of hyperlearnedisms. "Whom is she?" I take it that getting drunk isn't a sign of sophistication. Unless, like me, the character becomes extremely witty and utterly winning.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
How do I hate thee? Let me count the ways!
vincentlynch-moonoi11 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
First, be sure to read the review by st-shot. His summary statement is a classic! How do I hate thee, oh movie? Let me count the ways: First, the first third of the film (after the murder) -- where they are trying to establish Frederick March as a playboy detective -- is about the worst waste of celluloid in the history of the American cinema. It makes him -- and women -- look like fools.

Second, okay, so Joan Bennett went from blond to brunette. If that's the most notable thing about this film it tells you a lot about how bad this film really is.

Third, Ralph Bellamy's part is so dumb. I'd blame the big studio for forcing such a dumb part on him, but this was an independent film. A shame, because as we all know, Bellamy was a fine actor.

As st-shot points out, this film includes "some of the worst back projection in film history"...and what's more, that makes up a good half of the film.

Frankly, when the cobra shows up, I was hoping it would somehow put an end to March and Bennett, and that we -- the faithful viewers -- would be put out of our misery.

Now, in all fairness, this movie isn't all bad. The love scenes between March and Bennett are actually pretty decent. And Ann Southern is very pleasant on screen, although I'm not sure that her presence is at all logical. The last third of the film is decent and has an interesting plot twist, although how the right people show up at a party is rather bewildering; I guess it made sense to the screenwriters...too bad it was so confusing to the audience (as several of our reviewers have noted it).

It would be easy to excuse this poor film by noting that it was made way back in 1938. But that's just a year before "Gone With The Wind" and "The Wizard Of Oz" and half a dozen other notable masterpieces. I give this one an "D". Don't waster your time.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What an embarrassing waste of talent
Byrdz4 November 2021
It was not really funny. It was not really a mystery because we saw the shooting and heard the cop's description of the murder and that was not what we had witnessed and so we knew what would eventually happen somewhere down the pike.

When the "mystery" was cleared up we had never met the perpetrator before OR that person had been too insignificant to notice. And the finale seemed rushed and pointless.

As for the talent being wasted ... Ann Sothern TRIED but her dialogue was forced. Ralph Bellamy is too smart to play stupid convincingly, Joan Bennett and Frederic March seemed unconvincing as a romancing pair.

The rear projection was pitiful ...even for being the first feature to use it extensively. Lame and distracting.

Skip this one !
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The real Fredric March
HotToastyRag12 February 2024
Blind with rage and grief at her sister's suicide, Joan Bennett goes to the apartment of the man she believes responsible: Sidney Blackmer, her sister's married lover. Joan confronts him and after he shows no remorse, Joan shoots him and flees the scene. Wanted for murder, she changes her hair color from her normal blonde to a deep, rich brunette - a look that stayed with her the rest of her career. Personally, I prefer her as a blonde, but with her widow's peak, arched eyebrows, and spunky smile, she does look very much like Vivien Leigh. Then, she flees the country and sets the police on a chase around the world.

Thomas Mitchell is the head of the police force, and he knows there's only one man who can find the murderess: Fredric March. Freddie is a private detective who always gets his man - or woman! There are a lot of touch-and-go scenes where he almost catches up to her, and his clever mind entertains audiences to no end. It's very fun to see the playful, prankster side of Fredric March, since biographers will tell you that's how he acted in real life. He thinks on his feet, leads his colleagues down wild goose chases, and acts his way out of numerous pickles.

Of course, when he finally does catch up with Joan, there's a wrench thrown in: they fall in love. Is he pretending to woo her, just so he can arrest her? Does he even know it's her? Does she know that he knows, and is she playing him so she can get away? It's a sweet romance with a lot of humor on Freddie's side thrown in, but the fly in the ointment is Ann Sothern. She plays Freddie's ditzy secretary, and her amateur delivery combined with her enormous ego ruined any chance of a decent performance. She's paired up with Ralph Bellamy, who plays another detective: bespectacled, far too serious, and too busy looking far ahead that he can't see what's at the end of his nose. When first laying eyes on Ann, Freddie plays a joke by saying, "Dr. Livingstone, I presume?" Ralph doesn't get the humor, and he calls her Dr. Livingstone throughout the rest of the movie. If you don't mind the secondary pair, though, and you want a glimpse at the real Fredric March, check out Trade Winds.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Trade Winds blows.
st-shot2 July 2011
In a fit of rage Kay Kerrigan ( Joan Bennett ) blows away her surly boyfriend and takes it on the lam to the Far East. The police commissioner sends a numbers rube, Ben Blodgett (Ralph Bellamy ) and a Lothario Sam Wye, (Fredric March) to retrieve her but she remains a step ahead puddle jumping to Singapore, New Zealand and Ceylon. While Blodget keeps his nose to the ground Wye chases women, one of which turns out to be Kerrigan. Unaware it is her at first he falls in love with Kay. When his secretary (Ann Sothern) arrives on the scene and tells him the reward for her capture and return is a hundred Gs Sam is faced with a tough choice.

There is little to no spark in Trade Winds. After a rousing opening the film's rhythm slows and the principles with the exception of a feisty performance from Sothern remain uninspired. Even with Dorothy Parker writing her lines Bennett shows little edge and desperation of someone on the run. March is just as boring, his scenes with Bennet never getting above tepid. Ralph Bellamy is an absolute buffoon playing a provincial prude with an over the top turn that would get him yanked off the stage of community theater.

What is most galling about Trade Winds though is some of the worst back projection in film history. Poorly matched and with a totally different texture, director Tay Garnet sloppily slaps it on with contemptuous abandon. Trade Winds blows.
7 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
around Asia via process shots
mukava99113 May 2011
If you hate process shots, you may not want to see "Trade Winds" which uses more of them than perhaps any other dramatic film of its time, as it follows a young murderess (Joan Bennett) from Honolulu to Tokyo to Shanghai to Indochina to Ceylon to India as she flees the law. But if you love Joan, her loveliness of form, face and manner compensate for a great deal. And you get to see her as both a blonde and a brunette. Although she is billed in huge letters above Fredric March and Ralph Bellamy, I'd say March, as a womanizing detective who pursues her, has more screen time in one of his lesser roles. He's not bad, just not exciting. Ralph Bellamy is saddled with an overwritten comical supporting role as an eager-beaver detective, and tries very hard to make his repetitious and predictable actions funny. Ann Sothern handles her wisecracks as snappily as ever as March's secretary, and has some effective drunk scenes, but also seems forced. At its heart, this is a deeply romantic story about love conquering all but it also has elements of screwball comedy (the supporting players), suspense (the crime, the chase, the climax), travelogue (endless process shots of the Orient as backdrops for less-than-thrilling dramatic scenes with the principals). Despite some snappy moments (particularly in the first third), ever-shifting locations, a generally brisk pace and a powerhouse writing trio which includes Dorothy Parker, the story loses its grip.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Trade Winds is a Pearl
jayraskin2 November 2013
I guess by the negative reviews here, movie viewers have not gotten any smarter in the 75 years since this film was released. Few people can appreciate and enjoy the brilliant sophistication of this film.

First it is important to understand that censorship by the Hayes Office was at its worst in 1938. It wasn't strictly enforced before 1936 and relaxed a little bit during World World II. By the early 1950's European cinema was cracking open the Hollywood censorship open bit by bit. In 1937-38, it was perhaps at its strictest. The fact that Dorothy Parker and Tay Garnet was able to push such a sensuous and passionate movie past the Hayes Code censors is a tribute to their brilliance. Tay Garnet later directed the equally sensuous and passionate "The Postman Always Rings Twice" in 1946.

Think of the lead characters - the heroine is a murderer (even if she has her reasons) and the hero is a hard drinking, mercenary womanizer. The Hayes Code strictly forbade glamorizing such people and allowing them to go unpunished for their behavior. Yet Garnet, Parker and Alan Campbell are able to come up with characters and a plot that tie the Hayes code in knots. They are totally charming rogues.

Joan Bennett and Fredric March are amazing in the leads -- witty, charming and sophisticated. Their sidekicks, Ann Southern and Ralph Bellamy are hilarious. The plot twists are still novel and unexpected after all these years.

As for the bad process photography that reviewers are complaining about, please understand that this is a comedy. The process photography was poorly done on purpose. The film was sarcastically commenting on the overuse of process shots in Hollywood by throwing in dozens of obviously fake process shots of Japan, China, Indochina, Singapore and more. The process shots are hilarious. Complaining about the process shots is like complaining that the sets and special effects in Austin Powers don't look as believable as the ones in James Bond.

After watching this one, I'm ready to go out and party and drink a toast to Dorothy, Alan, Tay, Joan, Fredric, Ann and Ralph. Of all the screwball comedies of the 1930's, this is one of the most sophisticated and funniest. Don't miss it.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
abjectly stupid
herb-924-14873412 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Surely this is a film as profoundly stupid as most of the films being foisted on us today. I think it was meant to be a screwball comedy -- a genre that flourished with enjoyable results in the late 30s -- but it develops into (spoiler!!) a flicker about whether the beautiful woman will go to chair, or gas chamber, or gallows (whichever was in use back then). March is playing an impossible game in which he knows that the pursuer will somehow show up at the unknown island and miss with his .38, knows Bennett will be convicted, and knows he can (spoiler!!) spot the real culprit with a (spoiler!!) phony radio newscast. Then the murderer (spoiler!!) is instantly plugged in a version of Dodge City justice. And no blood spills on the rugs! This is really awful, and one wonders why an actor as good as the great March agreed to take the script on. Bennett is a beauty though, so the thing to do is turn the sound off and just watch her whilst she is on-screen. Shame on TCM for not heading this one off before it disgraced the screen.
4 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slip-Shod Disappointment
dougdoepke16 May 2011
Detective (March) goes on globe-hopping quest to return suspected murderess (Bennett) to authorities. He's aided by two bumblers (Sothern & Bellamy), at the same time he falls for his attractive quarry.

Not quite a sophisticated comedy, not quite a picaresque chase, not quite a murder mystery- - all add up to a not very good movie. Hard to believe this is from glossy MGM since the production values are nearly incompetent. In fact, I've seen better process shots from a Lash LaRue oater, and since these make up half the movie, you've got to wonder where quality control was.

I'm assuming acerbic wit Dorothy Parker and husband Alan Campbell were hired to furnish sophisticated banter for the two couples. If so, I must have missed it. What I did hear were subtle grammar gaffes from Sothern (e.g. 'whom for 'who') and clever malaprops (e.g. 'deduct' for 'deduce') from Bellamy, intended, I guess, to show their humorous pretensions, but hardly crowd-pleasers.

Also, it looks like Bellamy's buffoonish cop amounts to a typical example of 30's cops when Hollywood treated them as low-comedy relief. And whose idea was it to tack on the last 10-minutes of whodunit that sort of sticks out like a glued on appendage.

Where the movie does work is with the lovely Bennett and the comedically gifted Sothern. Still, it's a bit puzzling why the movie didn't turn out better given the talent involved, including ace producer Walter Wanger. Maybe it has to do with as many as four writers and who knows how many re-writes or with director Garnett's inability to forge a unifying style. But, whatever the reason, the film remains a somewhat unlikely disappointment.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sans Logic
sb-47-6087376 November 2018
Here we have a detective, ripe for a #MeToo, and may be the Bosses are ready to overlook this delinquency (probably it wasn't one that time, or even James Bond times) but they have (rightly so) some doubt on his falling prey to charms, and hence they put an official shadow, to stick to him like a leech, only that shadow is probably one of the most dumb and incompetent person (Bellamy as Blodget) imaginable, his nemesis detective Elliot (as Faulkiner) of course was a match (almost). The Movie is totally without any plot, whatever is there, is made ludicrous by the holes that crop out at every other moment. First of all, any detective, the moment they got to scene of crime, would have thought of the location of the killing shot (base of skull) - vs the front where the blank shot has sprayed the powder and started thinking. The agency which could trace her from a ring sold at remote place (when she was supposed to be dead, and hence the jewelries weren't under watch), didn't try to trace the originator of the gloves, which probably (without DNA), they could have not only found from the stores but also from the size (at least that it wasn't her). The following her around the world was not only too chancy but also the political aspects weren't taken care of, none were "American" territories, that they could simply land over and arrest people (in fact a few weren't even common-wealth). JB has the licence to kill (but not arrest). Tracing her through the Piano tune itself is a bit too much. As was the conviction within a few days of arrest (House-warming party was "Tomorrow Night"), within that the trial not only started, but was over too. Don't they get some chance for the defense lawyer (let's forget the Prosecutors) to prepare their case? What about selection of Jury etc. Of course even the unprepared case, the Electric Chair wasn't secured (Jury 9:3 won't get a chair, only life). These are only a few of the holes, that left an after taste, even after rushing through the bits. I wonder why didn't she try to reach her father (in Egypt) ? There is no mention of his being Late. But she quite studiously avoided the whole zone. A bit of chance is OK, since it makes a story, but too much of chance is just a spoiler. Despite the set of actors, whom I quite like, Bennet, Sothern, and March too isn't too bad, though here I would say, Bellamy was better (even though too bungling to be a detective) but they can't really keep water retain in a sieve, can they ? If they wanted to prove the way the SFPD - Detectives work, well, I don't know, and can't really comment.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
a real clunker
fritzlangville20 October 2023
March is a playboy detective on the trial of a notorious femme fatal played femme and fatal by Joan Bennett. From the annoying persistent music to the irritating character played by March there's really not much to like here. Exotic locales are unevenly matched with not so convincing sets. But worst of all is Ralph Bellamy playing March's idiot "assistant" emphasis on ass. Did Bellamy really talk like that in all his movies? His voice sounds like a tin can full of gravel that has been submerged in slow drying cement. Would have rated it a 4 except for a very sexy Ann Southern as March's would be detective secretary and the now stunning brunettel femme fatale Joan Bennet.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
poignant evocative nostalgia
mayo23382 May 2001
In a time when the world was young and we were happy immortals and the good guys/bad guys demarcation was clearly drawn , there was an unearthly charm to the world. The portrayals by Joan Bennett, Frederick March, Joan Blondell and Ralph Bellamy charm and beguile the soul. The music of Chopin adds a touch of class and elegance.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Major Stars Before They Starred In Major Roles
lylestrong11 April 2024
This movie was fun to watch only to see Fredric March and Joan Bennett several years before they made "The Best Years of Our Lives" (March) and Joan Bennett (Woman in the Window, Scarlett Street, and later on television "Dark Shadows"). Ralph Bellamy's character was too clownish and became annoying. For movie buffs this would be a good addition to a Joan Bennett or Fredric March collection, or as a good addition to 'movies by actors before they really hit the big time'. And of course Sidney Blackmer before he appeared in "Rosemary's Baby" and "How To Murder Your Wife". At 94 minutes it seemed overlong.

It's on DVD from Classic Flix. It could benefit from a digital remastering but Classic Flix provides "affordable no-frills editions"
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed