Little Friend (1934) Poster

(1934)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Interesting
calvertfan24 February 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Little Friend starts off with one of its most chilling scenes; the young girl is having a nightmare and things around her room morph into grotesque figures, leading you into thinking this is going to be a horror movie or something. It's not, but it does get quite disturbing.

An upper class little English girl seems to have the perfect life, until she becomes an unwilling witness to her parents' divorce.

She is forced to testify in court when she runs away late one night to the house of her mother's friend (who said she could drop by "any time", and she decides that 11pm is the time to do it!), but then runs off when she sees her mother's fur coat there and the stark truth hits her. She then ends up at the shop of her friend, a lower class boy who saved her from being hit by a car once. This boy's part is not developed enough; you see him being teased for being lower-class when he attends a part of Felicity's with all of her posh friends, and you can see that the young girl has an obvious crush on him, but his part seems to falter midway.

After it is found where she had been that night, she is put on the witness stand in the court and has to say whether she saw any sign of her mother at the friend's house, or not. The stress of having to place one parent above the other, however, is far too much for her.

A good movie that feels a little long, but you have to stay watching to see what happens in the end. Also the only movie I've ever seen where a little girl tries to gas herself. 7 out of 10.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent for 1934
boblipton4 June 2017
Nova Pilbeam gives a fine first screen performance in Berthold Viertel's movie. She is the witness to the breakup of her parents, Matheson Lang and and Lydia Sherwood. Lang is a loving father, distracted by business, and Miss Sherwood has been engaging in an affair with actor Arthur Margetson. Everyone tries to pretend that nothing is happening, but children are always attentive to what people around them do. Unable to cope, she turns peculiar.

the script by Christopher Isherwood -- it's his first screenplay -- treads a careful path between the reality of the situation and what the censors would permit. Certainly, it is more honest than anything Hollywood might have tried to produce under the newly enforced Production Code, If, in the face of more open and honest films like KRAMER VS. KRAMER, it comes off as coy and with a mildly disturbing ending, well, a lot changed in terms of what was acceptable in movies in the forty-five years that separate the two films. For 1934, it is a fine film, even if its luster has dimmed.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exceptional Film Starring Nova Pilbeam
drednm15 April 2012
Stark and wonderful film about the effects of a divorcing couple on their young teenage child (Nova Pilbeam).

The film starts with a surreal dream as the child struggles in bed to the sounds of her parents' violent argument in the next room. On the surface everything seems normal but the mother (Lydia Sherwood) is more and more absent from the house, and the father (Matheson Lang) has moved out. She spends most of her time with her governess (Jean Cadell).

The girl starts to catch on that things are not right when she catches the mother in a series of lies. She's having an affair with a ham actor (Arthur Margetson), who in an attempt to befriend the girl (he calls her his "little friend"), says she may visit him whenever she likes and they'll talk.

After catching the mother in another lie, the girl races away on her scooter and heads into the main street where sh crashes into a delivery boy (Jimmy Hanley) who becomes her closest friend.

After a series in incidents, the girl finally runs off to the actor's house where she discovers her mother in his bedroom. After a botched suicide attempt, the girl ends up in court, trying to lie to save her mother's reputation.

Pilbeam, in her first film, is around 15 (and playing younger) and she's just terrific as the betrayed child. Sherwood and Lang are good at playing the unsympathetic parents. Cadell and Margetson are solid. Jimmy Hanley almost steals the film as the cheerful delivery boy.

Co-stars include Cecil Parker, Finlay Currie, Clare Greet, and Fritz Kortner as a menacing giant in a grim children's play.

Pilbeam would of course have her biggest film successes in Hitchcock's YOUNG AND INNOCENT and THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH. She remains an intriguing talent of the 30s and 40s, an exceptional young actress who should have been a bigger star.

The themes and images of nightmare, horror, danger, menace, betrayal, and sorrow are beautifully handled in this very un-Hollywood-like film.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Felicity will break your heart
kidboots5 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Nova Pilbeam was a superb child actress. She didn't rely on cute looks, golden curls or singing and dancing. She relied on her talent. She didn't make many films but two were directed by Alfred Hitchcock and one was a superior historical drama. "Little Friend" was her triumph.

The film starts with a surreal nightmare that comes together as the film proceeds. Felicity is awakened by her parents quarrelling. Her parents are on the verge of separating - she is too young to understand the complexities of the relationship between her mother and father and Mr. Hilliard, her mother's lover.

Mr. Hilliard is an actor and has given Felicity a signed photo "to my little friend". She is old enough to know something is wrong. At the park she sees her mother out riding with Mr. Hilliard - after that she decides to "play up". After almost being run over she meets Leonard (Jimmy Hanley) who saves her. They (Felicity and her Nanny, (Jean Cadell) visit his mother's bakery shop and a friendship develops.

Felicity comes from a family of wealth and privilege and the film shows that money cannot buy happiness. There is also a birthday party where Felicity invites Leonard. The other children isolate him because they know he is not of their class.

The film is a harrowing depiction of the effects of divorce on a young girl. The film is stylistically directed by Berthold Viertel and written by Christopher Isherwood and Margaret Kennedy. Wth gowns by Schiaparelli it is a very high class film in every way.

Felicity runs away to visit Hilliard who has said his "little friend" can visit whenever she likes. She wants to ask him not to see her mother anymore but recognises her mother's fur coat on the couch. There is a frightening court room scene where Felicity is treated as a "hostile witness" with both parents using her in their efforts to "win points" over the other. In the stark climax Felicity goes home and tries to gas herself.

It is a film you would not find coming out of Hollywood in 1934.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Interesting stage in Christopher Isherwood's career
genet-14 November 2007
In his memoir CHRISTOPHER AND HIS KIND, Christopher Isherwood devotes an entire chapter to working with Viertel. Novelist Margaret Kennedy wrote an earlier screenplay, but Viertel didn't like it, or her, calling her 'a crocodile who wept once in her life a real tear.' Isherwood, who never saw the Kennedy script, though they are co-credited as writers, was suggested as a collaborator by Jean Ross, the real-life "Sally Bowles" of his Berlin stories (She demanded half his first week's salary in return.) Viertel wanted someone who spoke German, and was new to movies; "He needed an amateur, an innocent, a disciple, a victim," writes Isherwood. A professional would have made Viertel embarrassed at working on this piece of trivia, but he told Isherwood, 'I feel absolutely no shame before you; we are like two married men who meet in a whorehouse.' During production, Viertel used the fact that both could speak German to impress the crew, taking Isherwood into the corner and discussing finer points of the film in that language while the technicians looked on in awe. For all Viertel's contempt for LITTLE FRIEND, it was successful both financially and critically,described by the NEW YORK TIMES as "very close to being a masterpiece of its kind."
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Nova's Felicity merits a Restoration! Warning: Spoilers
With apologies to every child actress who ever stepped onto the screen, I hereby state that the best performance ever given my one was that of a now virtually forgotten British youngster, Nova Pilbeam. The picture "Little Friend," and most of her others have long been mostly unavailable.

Americans saw Nova Pilbeam only three times as a child. Of the few pictures she made as a young leading woman, only one-Hitchcock's "The Girl Was Young/Young & Innocent"-is worth mentioning in any review of her performances.

She was fourteen when she played Felicity in "Little Friend." It's the story of divorce told through the eyes of a youngster, old enough to grasp what is happening, too young to comprehend the circumstances. She was a remarkably plain little girl in an era when screen children were all curls and dimples. But in her desperate anguish which drove her to the brink of suicide, she was almost beautiful.

She gave another superb performance two years later as Lady Jane Grey, the pawn of royal intrigue, in "Nine Days a Queen/Tudor Rose," certainly one of the most distinguished historical dramas ever filmed. And she appeared for Hitchcock twice-as the kidnapped child in the first version of "The Man Who Knew Too Much" and in "The Girl Was Young," the most underrated of his British thrillers.

Nova Pilbeam is just an odd name to movie fans today, but I'll wager that nobody who saw "Little Friend," or "Nine Days a Queen" has ever forgotten her.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed