In Love with Life (1934) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
What the dickies?
Spuzzlightyear6 March 2006
Another Dickie Moore oddity here. Along with Tomorrow's Youth, Moore sure had the weepy-kid-caught-in-the-middle-of-an-adult-situation market covered, didn't he? Here, he plays a kid who is handed off to his rich Grandfather when his Mom realizes that the life he would have there would be more stable, and plus, since she took off quite a while ago with a man Grandpa didn't approve of, he is quick to kick her out of the house and leave the grandson with him So this is a very Stella Dallas situation. But luckily, the old man's assistant, played rather stiffly by Onslow Stevens, takes a shining to the woman, and agrees to give her news about the boy, while she's trying to eke out of a living. Now, the story is pretty treacley, with a LOT of sap for you to weep over, and a fun little twist ending reflecting the Stock Market Crash of 1929, AND the treatment of seniors during this era (compare it to now, it's interesting). But I think what this film will be truly known for is the AWESOME, how shall I say it, a part amusement area, part concert hall, filled with hideous looking robotic moving clowns AND a floor show that will just leave you drop-jawed with it's Betty Boop imitator, played, yes, by a kid who looks no more than 5 years old, and then a dance routine with, AGAIN, a bunch of 5 year olds. Knowing the coordination levels of these kids of course, this makes the dance all the more amusing. The audience is filled with kids, some of which look bored out of their minds. (love the 4 year old cigarette girl)

This is worth the viewing alone.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Little Miss Betty Boop
JoeytheBrit1 December 2009
This ultra-low budget quickie is actually quite good – although it's clear that a good chunk of the action was missing from the version I saw (which ran about 50 minutes, while IMDb gives a running time of over an hour). The story is typical Hollywood hokum, designed to pull at the heartstrings of anyone with a nurturing nature. Crusty (but wealthy) old grandpa agrees to care for his daughter's son on the condition that she never darken his doorstep again. Fortunately for her, a mild-mannered teacher hired by Grandpa to teach the boy takes a shine to her. There must be an early scene in the film when these two meet, as later she admits to taking his wallet when they were sat on a bench in the park, but this wasn't in the version I saw. This being a film that has fallen into the public domain, I imagine there are countless versions floating around the internet and on cheap DVDs.

Little Dicky Moore is the little boy who's the focus of all the maternal angst, and he's quite good. He doesn't overact like Shirley Temple or Jackie Cooper, and he isn't so cute and lovable that you feel like you're having your emotions manipulated for cheap gain by cold-hearted movie directors. Perhaps this lack of cuteness explains why he never made it as big as Temple or Cooper.

What does stick in the memory about this film is a quite frankly mind-boggling sequence set in some kind of kiddie's café. The entertainment is provided by kids, one of whom is a little female tot, no older than four or five, dressed up to resemble Betty Boop who sings provocatively to her audience. Anyone trying to film a scene like that would probably find themselves up on all manner of charges today, but back then it was probably just a cute novelty with no ulterior motive on the part of the adults involved. Little Betty is followed by an equally young dance troupe who try to perform a Cossack dance with predictably – but wholly unintentional – hilarious results.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Diabetics might want to think twice about watching this one...or at least they should have their insulin nearby!
planktonrules22 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This version of "In Love With Life" is the public domain version--a severely truncated one at that. the entire first portion of the film with the professor begin dismissed because of his objections to the college's misguided priorities is missing as is the meeting of the professor with the irrepressibly adorable Dickie Moore in the park. In fact, almost 15 minutes of the film was chopped out of this version--so keep this in mind when you read my review.

The film is very obviously a reworking of the story of "Little Lord Fauntleroy". Why they changed the story like they did, I am uncertain. But, it IS possible they did this to avoid having to pay royalties--something pretty common for poverty row production companies like Chesterfield. One warning about it, however, is that while the film is enjoyable, it is, at times, so incredibly sticky sweet that diabetics might lapse into comas when watching--so beware! The public domain version begins with the unemployed professor seeking a job from a very grouchy old man. He disliked the old guy thoroughly (and even Will Rogers would feel the same), so although he did need the job, he tells the old guy what he thinks of him! Well, although the old guy is a cantankerous jerk, he respects the professor's pluck and gives him the job. The job is to care for and educate poor little 'ol Dickie Moore.

So why is the old guy suddenly caring for his grandson? Well, it seems that his daughter had run off with some ne'er do well his telling her not to marry the guy. The father was right--the new husband was a creep. But, to punish her, he's cut her off--and now she's penniless and in need for herself and her son (Dickie). BUT, the old guy is vindictive--he agrees to raise the boy but only if she would disappear out of the boy'd if forever! So where's it all to do next? Well, see it for yourself. However, it is a nice little tale about family and redemption that you can really enjoy if you don't mind how heavy-handed it can be as well as that it really is a ripped-off plot.

By the way, if you do watch this movie, get a look at that bizarre place where the professor takes Dickie. I guess it's supposed to be 1930s version of Chuck-e-Cheese but it defies description. Seriously....it's so bizarre and the kiddie cabaret scenes are mega-creepy. I could say more, but you just need to see it for yourself....yikes!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not the grandfather of a boy's dreams.
mark.waltz29 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Bitterly hurt over what he considered a major betrayal, wealthy but miserable Claud Gillingwater orders visiting daughter Lila Lee out of the house and to leave grandson Dickie Moore behind and never see him again. She's down on her luck after the death of the husband he didn't approve of, having forbidden her to marry him, an order she refused. So his vengeance is cruel and unjust, but he gets Moore and even wins over his affections, only because Moore didn't find out what grumpy did. Financial issues involving the market begin to affect Gillingwater, all the while not knowing that his assistant Onslow Stevens is seeing Lee on the side and keeping her up to date.

Made before he was grumpy to Shirley Temple, this isn't going to win Gillingwater any new fans as he's pretty rotten, even though onscreen in other films he was one of the most loveable grouches on screen. Moore gets a lot of sappy material (talking to Lee on the phone, thinking that she's the operator), and other than when he tells off nasty housekeeper Rosita Marstini, Stevens gives a dull performance. After 30 seconds of an obnoxious Betty Boop imitation by a Meglan ("maudlin") Kiddie, I had to fast forward through the rest of that scene. You'll have to check for cavities by the time this is over, and I don't need to see the missing 16 minutes to get more sapped out.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed