Dirty Work (1934) Poster

(1934)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
What larks!
1930s_Time_Machine27 March 2024
Yes it's silly, it's not meant to be taken seriously so to enjoy this you need to switch your mind off: tune in, turn on and drop out. You'll then love this wonderfully entertaining hour of happiness, fun and frivolity

This is one of the original Aldwych Farces which was performed virtually by this same cast in the West End two years earlier. It has therefore been road tested so proven and certified as something to make you laugh. One additional plus this picture has is the stunningly gorgeous Lilian Bond in a rare leading role.

Lovely Lilian is not a particularly convincing actress but she doesn't need to be in something like this. Neither is she funny which probably isn't her fault - it's just how her character is written. Her role is mainly decorative which I'm not complaining about too much because she certainly is very decorative! Like a lot of comedy writers in the 20s and 30s, Ben Travers didn't really write roles for women. Maybe that's why people don't associate classic comedy with women?

The stars in this are Aldwych stalwarts Ralph Lynn and Robertson Hare playing their usual ridiculously over exaggerated stereotypes but this film benefits from also having not just top class comedians but a real actor as well. Playing his usual professional cockney is Gordon Harker - an actor who seems to have been in every other English film ever made in the 1930s. Harker gets the part played on stage by the troupe's leader Tom Walls so Walls is not in this.

Tom Walls just directs this time. Back in 34, the Aldwych purists reacted to 'outsider' Harker being in 'their' picture in the same way that Carry On fans objected to Phil Silvers appearing in FOLLOW THAT CAMEL but I think Harker is far more personable than Walls, certainly fa 21st century audience and he actually enhances this.

If you've never heard of the Aldwych Farces but do like old Will Hay pictures then you might want to try this.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Knockabout farce
Neil-11720 May 2002
The humor is mainly in the dialog, which is a constant stream of puns, ambiguity and double entendres, supported by chaotic action with many semi-slapstick sight gags. The characters are all amusing stereotypes and the plot is definitely secondary to all of the above. The whole thing is totally lighthearted fun of a rather dated kind which would appeal to those who appreciate the old silent comedies; I'd only recommend this if you are in that kind of mood.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed