Doctor Bull (1933) Poster

(1933)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Sounds kinda simple"
Steffi_P13 June 2011
The best remembered stars of the early 1930s may be such beautiful and provocative sirens as Greta Garbo and Marlene Dietrich, but at the time they were slightly outdone at the box office and the reliable Quigley poll by more down-to-earth and homely figures, chief among them Wallace Beery, Marie Dressler and of course Will Rogers. Audiences warmed to his air of honesty and decency in what was a time of great economic strife and social confusion. Will was a busy man in 1933, and while his biggest hit of the year was the sublime State Fair, he also made a number of lesser pictures which nonetheless had all the merits of his gentle personality.

Doctor Bull is a neat little tale of a small town medic up against closed-minded gossipmongers on the one hand and ravaging businessmen on the other. Director John Ford depicts the scenes with a characteristically passive hand. His camera is mostly to one side of the action, and there are few close-ups. He carefully follows movement and changes the angle occasionally to stop scenes getting stale, but barring one or two key moments (such as the shot from behind the table of a drunk Rochelle Hudson), the technique is so subtle we are allowed to forget the camera even exists. Fox studios, where this was produced, were among the last studios to start using incidental music in their movies, and even for the era Doctor Bull is starkly quiet. The overall feeling is one of tranquillity and unhurried simplicity.

Such a feeling also radiates from Rogers himself. His is a calm and methodical performance, and yet one that expresses a great deal. Rogers is the kind of man who can command a lot of attention and respect by doing very little, and therein lies a lot of his appeal. He was chiefly thought a comedy actor, but most of the comedy in Doctor Bull lies in quirky supporting players (as it often did in John Ford pictures). However, Rogers still shows a knack for delivering a line for comedic effect, usually with characteristic nonchalance. When one of his young patients is "rescued" from vaccination by his father, Rogers calls out "Hope your arm don't hurt ya tomorrow", without even looking up from his business. A sly little comment, made with just enough of a knowing hint to come across as a private joke with audience.

Such a light little movie as Doctor Bull was never going to win awards or move audiences to floods of tears or gales of laughter, but it has a nice, inoffensive quality to it that is very relaxing. It uses the era's "pre-code" liberalism, not to shock or titillate, but to deal sensitively (albeit covertly) about the issue of pregnancy outside marriage. And thanks to its aura of friendliness which is never forced but simply unfolds before us, embodied in the warm and trustworthy Mr Rogers, one cannot help but feel uplifted by it.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Medicine, a noble calling
bkoganbing15 January 2017
John Ford certainly loved the medical profession. Go through his film list and wherever you see a doctor character it will inevitably it will be a noble if perhaps flawed character. His most famous doctor was Josiah Boone in Stagecoach where Thomas Mitchell won a Best Supporting Actor Oscar. But in Doctor Bull, the first of the three films Ford did with Will Rogers, Rogers is in the title role of George Bull, small New England town physician who has taken care of his town for two going on three generations.

Not that some of the town appreciates his toil. He's angered the powerful Banning family headed by Berton Churchill who has not only poisoned the town water, but poisoned the town against Doctor Bull. His gossipy sisters have filled the town with speculation about the doctor's relationship with Vera Allen a widow. Not like they're not adults, but you have to wonder about the lives that people lead when they're main concern is what everyone else is doing.

The film has some parallels to the Bing Crosby/Barry Fitzgerald film Welcome Stranger when for a brief moment it's thought the town has an epidemic. Some of the vested interests in Fitzgerald's New England town want to remove him as well.

Some of the best comic moments are provided by Rogers and Andy Devine who plays a soda jerk in the local pharmacy and is a constant main in the butt to Rogers because of his imagined ills. Devine is the hypochondriac's hypochondriac.

Rogers is always working 24/7 for his people and using a method that was tried successfully with animals affects a cure from a disease that has left Howard Lally bedridden for months. What happens there gives Rogers the last laugh on his ungrateful town.

The observations on the human condition of Will Rogers are timeless. Medicine does not look the same today as it did for Doctor Bull. But the truths are eternal.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too much caster oil.
rmax30482325 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
John Ford and Will Rogers made three movies together in the mid 1930s. "Steamboat Round the Bend" is a broad comedy dealing with what Joseph Campbell called "creative mythology" -- the need to overthrow old myths in favor of more recent ones. "Judge Priest" showed Will Rogers as an easygoing magistrate with a casual approach to the law and a serious approach to fishing. "Doctor Bull" is probably the least of the three. Rogers is a small-town doctor who we see ministering to his many patients, curbing a typhoid epidemic, curing a paralyzed young man, seeing to it that young girls "in trouble" are properly married, and courting a local widow.

If it doesn't succeed -- and it doesn't -- it's because Ford and the writers couldn't decide what kind of story this was supposed to be and, chiefly, because Will Rogers is miscast.

Rogers began as a stand-up one-man show, twirling a lasso, commenting with gentle and homespun wit on politics. Some of his comments have entered the national Bartlet's. "I never met a man I didn't like." "All I know is what I read in the newspapers." The character of Doctor Bull is not laid back and although Rogers still shuffles and mumbles, the story is more of a medical drama than anything else. Bull is not sentimental or tender. He's gruff, often angry and insulting. It's like fitting a round peg into a square hole.

The medical aspects don't work either. The premarital pregnancies are only intimated, not spelled out. Bull cures the paralyzed kid with an injection of serum that seemed to cure a similarly paralyzed cow. (It's treated as a triumph for Bull.) Nobody involved seemed to care much about the kind of medicine that Bull practiced. He's always being accused of being old fashioned, among other gossip, and in fact he does seem out of it. When he's successful, it's because he seems lucky rather than innovative. Doctor Bovary had more sense. On the whole, the film lacks much of Ford's usual humor, his grasp of character. It's as if everyone were having a good time rather than putting effort into a weak screenplay.

Still, it's nostalgic. Doctors don't make house calls with their black bags anymore. It makes sense, of course. A doctor whose training was expensive, time consuming, and demanding, can find better things to do with his time than drive around from house to house with his bag. If, instead, the patients come to him at his office, he's able to use his time exclusively in practicing medicine. Max Weber called this the "rationalization of labor." It cuts wasted time.

When the paralyzed guy discovers feeling in his legs again, I'm extremely glad that Ford didn't put us through one of those, "Look! I can WALK!" scenes. But there should have been more oomph in the picture somewhere.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worth seeing for Will Rogers
Kalaman2 August 2002
"Doctor Bull" is Ford's first of three collaborations with Will Rogers. Much like their later pictures, it combines humor and drama with greater emphasis on dialogue and performance rather than narrative. Mr. Ford admired Rogers' folksy charm and found in him a figure whose moral wisdom perfectly matched with his own. In these leisurely and unpretentious pictures, Rogers is successfully a healer and reconciler, but, like most of Ford's subsequent protagonists, he is also a melancholy and lonely figure.

Though it is nowhere near the charm, subtlety and enduring greatness of "Judge Priest"(1934) & "Steamboat 'Round the Bend"(1935), "Doctor Bull" is nonetheless worth seeing for Mr. Rogers' loving portrayal of a small-town Connecticut doctor combating typhus and narrow-mindedness.

It is interesting to note that in the same year Rogers starred in another whiff of Americana - Henry King's lovely and often underrated "State Fair."
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Marcus Welby in Peyton Place
wes-connors31 December 2010
John Ford's first collaboration with Will Rogers introduces itself with the words, "Doctor Bull brings his neighbors into the world and postpones their departure as long as possible. He prescribes common sense and accepts his small rewords gratefully. His patients call him Doc." This opening makes "Doctor Bull" sound like it's going to be a wholesome and folksy tale - but don't expect the film to be the sweet story of a kindly doctor. The New England set town of "New Winton" turns out to be a 1930s "Peyton Place"…

Strait-laced citizens gossip about neighborly Mr. Rogers (as George "Doc" Bull) spending his evenings with lonely widow Vera Allen (as Janet Cardmaker). Telephone receptionist Marian Nixon (as May) fears husband Howard Lally (as Joe Tupping) may never walk again, after an accident leaves him paralyzed...

Matriarch Louise Dresser and the town's wealthy "Banning" family fret about the sudden marriage of pretty daughter Rochelle Hudson (as Virginia), apparently left pregnant after her boozy weekend with a football player. And, as if that wasn't enough drama, the entire town is threatened with typhoid fever. Since this is not supposed to be a serial, all the stories are tied up by the film's end. And, Mr. Ford makes sure you leave the theater laughing, as squeaky "soda shop" clerk Andy Devine reveals a secret...

****** Doctor Bull (9/22/33) John Ford ~ Will Rogers, Vera Allen, Rochelle Hudson, Louise Dresser
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Doctor in a small town
elo-equipamentos10 August 2017
John Ford made a pleasant movie about routine work of a doctor on a small city and the result is pretty good with sense of humor sometimes bitter for some tastes, but works very well, Will Rogers has a decent performance although l didn't know your career deeply, John Ford explores all kinds of situations on a small city's problems and bring to us how different is the life in those places, l know because l came from a similar city and it's just l'd used to see there, amazing movie!!!

Resume:

First watch: 2017 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 7.5
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
John Ford & Will Rogers: A Great Combination
Ron Oliver9 January 2000
Will Rogers stars in this little slice of Americana. He's the town's only doctor and a bit of a ladies' man. He's also the source of most of the local old maids' gossip. Which gives Will a great chance to use his special brand of humor to skewer the foibles of the human creature.

John Ford provides good atmosphere. This would be the first of 3 pictures he would make with Will. Rochelle Hudson shows why she was one of the prettiest actresses of the early '30's and Andy Devine is hilarious as a hypochondriac who is the bane of Doctor Bull's existence.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Will Rogers sure seemed nice
davidmvining16 November 2021
Recalling the middle section of Ford's earlier Arrowsmith, Doctor Bull is the story of a small town doctor and his life amidst the sicknesses, hypochondriacs, and general hustle and bustle of the small community. It's a light affair that mostly relies on the central performance by Will Rogers for its entertainment value with a late stage sense of plot that doesn't engage as much as it probably should.

The titular Doctor (Rogers) never seems to get a moment to himself. Subject to gossip by the local busybody Mrs. Banning (Louise Dresser) because of his frequent evening visits to the widow Janet Cardmaker (Vera Allen), Doctor Bull spends his days treating anyone who comes to him. He treats the local soda jerk Larry (Andy Devine) who is constantly complaining about pains in his sides. When Doc tells him that pain on the side he's complaining means that it's impossible that Larry has a burst appendix, Larry insists that he must have two.

There are successes in his treatments, like a boy coming out of a fever after an all-night observation and tending by Doc, and failures, like a woman dying because no one was able to find Doc (he had collapsed onto Janet's couch and fallen asleep as she read). The efforts of the people to find Doc go through the local switchboard operated by May (Marian Nixon) who is privy to most of the town's gossip and never takes it too hard that Doc never seems to be home. May has a husband at home, Joe (Howard Lally) who is bedridden and lame that Doc comes to visit, leading to late nights scouring through medical textbooks to find some kind of potential cure.

That's really the bulk of the film. Carried by Rogers in his affable, easy going style, he's understanding, funny, and even sardonic with the constant requests that tire him out endlessly day after day and season after season. He treats everyone with a mixture of familiarity, respect, and condescension that Rogers pulls off rather easily. You really get the sense that he's a nice, capable doctor who's struggling to keep his head above water with the amount of patients he has to deal with. It's probably most amusing when he helps the adult daughter of a wealthy family, destined to marry a Senator's son, elope with her poorer college German lover because he got her pregnant (pre-Code!) and feigns ignorance when confronted on it.

Late in the film we get the move's plot when Doc discovers a typhoid outbreak forming in the community. He goes into action, inoculating the children of the town against typhoid. When he comes to the conclusion that the outbreak most likely originated at a camp built near the source of the town's water supply, a camp he was supposed to inspect as a health official to the town but never found the time, the town is enraged and calls a meeting to get him removed from office. Doc takes the meeting badly, accurately calling out the town for monopolizing his time so that he can't do everything he probably should, and he's ready to quit.

Now, John Ford knew how to put together an ending, but the ending to Doctor Bull is a disappointment. Doc takes some information from a farmer about a serum Doc had made to help the farmer's lame cows, adapts it for human use, and gives it to the lame Joe, quickly fixing his lameness. This event is what suddenly gets him back in the town's good graces. It doesn't seem to fit, to be honest. It feels random.

The movie's not bad, but just wanes away. If the first two-thirds were funnier, the loose structure would have been less of a concern, but it's just an easy going bit of amusement until a finale that probably goes too far into melodrama for the film's own good. Will Rogers does his best, being affable and charming through his challenges, but for all his charisma, the film around him is just too waifishly thin.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'm not sure I'd call this a COMEDY! But it still is an excellent film and worth your time.
planktonrules23 December 2007
Despite starring Will Rogers and being marketed as a comedy, I really think that does this film an injustice and viewers may well feel confused by the lack of comedy. While Rogers has a few good zingers and one liners here and there, this isn't the point of the film and to me it's much more of a drama--much like the excellent film ONE MAN'S JOURNEY. Maybe much of the reason people see this as a comedy could also be because Rogers and director John Ford also teamed up shortly after this film for the comedy JUDGE PRIEST.

In DR. BULL, Rogers plays the title character--a very, very hard-working country doctor who is too seldom appreciated by the community. While some see him as a sort of savior, many old busy-bodies can only focus on all the perceived wrongs he has done--mostly because they are just vicious and sexless old hags! While these roles are very stereotypical and may seem unreal, I have personally known quite a few women EXACTLY like them. Even today, they pervade small towns, churches, social clubs, PTAs and other groups. Because of this, this film is a great form of social satire--even over 70 years later! As for the aesthetics of the film, I was quite impressed. John Ford really captured the small town feel and the winter scenes looked so real and inviting. Additionally, Rogers showed he really could act--playing a folksy but more complete character than usual--with flaws, strengths and emotions. All in all, a lovely film and a great time capsule. This film should be more famous than it is--and it's certainly much better than JUDGE PRIEST.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Will Rogers is wonderful as a gentle small-town doctor
netwallah2 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
A very nice small movie. An old doctor in New Winton, a small Connecticut town, George Bull (Will Rogers) knows everybody, makes endless housecalls, lives with his old aunt who calls him by the wrong name, and is sweet on the widow Janet Cardmaker (Vera Allen), sister of the big snooty family. The town goes along as usual, with a lot of gossip about the doctor spending so much time at the widow's house, and babies getting born, and a scratchy-voiced hypochondriacal soda jerk (Andy Devine), and the doctor curing an ailing cow, and the doctor trying to help a young man paralyzed by a fall, and the doctor helping the snooty family's daughter escape through marriage, and the snooty patriarch building some kind of construction camp too near the river, and then a typhoid epidemic, and opposition from the townsfolk, and a nasty town meeting called to oust him, and then he figures out a way of translating his cow-cure to the young man, cures him, and marries the widow. All very tidy local colour, complete with some good character-actor faces, and the business of starting and finishing the movie—and carrying on a lot of its action—at the train station and the post-office is really effective. What makes the movie way better than okay is the presence of Will Rogers, who projects kindness and good nature in his shambling way, seemingly without trying. Most of the time he hangs his head sort of sheepishly, and looks up, like a good man in his 50s still partly boyish even as he's committed to doing good in the world—and he does it well.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Decent Ford
Michael_Elliott28 February 2008
Doctor Bull (1933)

** (out of 4)

John Ford film about a kind country doctor (Will Rogers) who gets the town talking when he starts a relationship with a widow (Vera Allen). Soon enough the doctor is fighting rumors and suspicion more than illness. I was really shocked to see how old fashioned this film was in two ways. On the positive side is that director Ford makes an authentic looking picture as we believe the settings very well. However, on the down side, this film looks as if it were made in 1915. Early sound movies always featured problems but this one was made in 1933 so the technology was high enough to where there's no excuse for the technical quality of the film. The camera-work is shaky at best and even the soundtrack is pretty poor. The entire look of the film really makes it annoying to watch and the screenplay doesn't do too much with the characters. Rogers is good in his role but I was really left bored with the supporting cast. Andy Devine steals the show as a man who always has something bothering him.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed