Guilty as Hell (1932) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
One of the best of the Lowe/McLaglen collaborations
AlsExGal5 December 2009
As someone else mentioned this police procedural is done "Columbo style". In other words, you see the murder committed up front at the very beginning of the film and see how the murderer covers his tracks and even who he frames. The interesting part is seeing how Detective Capt. T.R. McKinley (Victor McLaglen) and reporter Russell Kirk (Edmund Lowe) solve the case. McLaglen and Lowe did a series of buddy pictures in the early 30's first at Fox and then at Paramount. This is one of the Paramount entries. As usual, the two claim to be friends but never cease to antagonize each other. In this case, reporter Kirk feels like he has the right to waltz into McKinley's office and interfere in his cases any time he feels like it because his stories got McKinley noticed and therefore promoted. During the first half of the film you'll most likely wish the murderer had strangled Kirk too, because he behaves in a most despicable manner - he's just a hardboiled unlikable guy. For example, at the crime scene he is standing over the corpse, smoking, sprinkling his cigarette ashes on her, and discussing how he doesn't care for the way the dead woman is dressed - he prefers women in nightgowns to women in pajamas. The Ick Factor is incredible. He later shows a softer side after he falls for the sister of the man who is framed for the murder.

Claire Dodd shows up as the murder victim in about five seconds of screen time. If you watch many precodes, in this film you finally get to see what you've probably wanted to see in any of those films in which she usually plays a femme fatale with no conscience - someone strangling the life out of her. Highly recommended for both fans of precode cinema and good old crime films.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Magnificent Pre-Code Comedy Thriller
richardchatten30 December 2017
Pre-Code Hollywood is a gift that just keeps giving; and the latest neglected gem to come my way is this cracking little comedy-thriller in which perennial sparring partners Victor McLaglen and Edmund Lowe play a detective and a reporter, the former seemingly impotent to prevent the latter from forever implausibly barging into his office and into crime scenes with impunity and in the process constantly winding him up.

Based on a play by Daniel N. Rubin called "Riddle Me This", the fun is as fast and as furious as Lowe repeatedly gets McLaglen. There's plenty of witty talk delivered by a dream supporting cast, while director Erle C. Kenton gives cameraman Karl Struss his head with some truly incredible camerawork, including close close-ups that underline key moments as if the high voltage acting hasn't already done it's bit to ensure it has your attention.

Enthusiastically recommended.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The two stars make this a must see film
dbborroughs21 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a neat little mystery. Its a well made Hollywood entertainment that uses every trick you can think of to draw you in and hold your attention.

The plot has a wealthy doctor killing his wife and framing a neighbor for the crime. We know he did it and we watch as he sets everything up for the frame to work (as has been aptly pointed out like an episode of Columbo). Coming to investigate is police detective Victor McLaglen and his friend and frequent rival Edmund Lowe who is a reporter. The pair at first think things are clear cut but soon Lowe, thanks to the dead man's sister, begins to see they made a terrible mistake.

Good mystery is lifted up a couple of notches thanks to the two leads whose constant bickering and friendly kidding add to the proceedings. Honestly the pair is what makes this film a must see. The film is nothing is not a precursor to todays buddy films.

A film to search out.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Excellent "Columbo"-style caper
"Guilty As Hell" is an excellent crime drama which follows the same format later used in the "Columbo" tv series: we see a man plan a murder and carry it out, then we see him attempt to mislead the homicide detective. This film is NOT a whodunit, because we know the murderer's identity and methods from the very beginning. What matters here is the duel of wits between the killer and the sleuth. Wealthy Doctor Tindall (played by Henry Stephenson) murders his wife and sets up an elaborate "Columbo"-type alibi for himself, involving his next-door neighbours and a vacuum-tube radio of the type that was common when this movie was made (1932). One piece of business in this movie will be obscure for modern viewers, so (without spoiling anything, and to help you follow what's happening) I'll explain that old-fashioned radios didn't activate until several seconds after they were switched on, because they needed time for the valves to warm up. As part of his murder scheme, Dr Tindall also invents a new flavour of chewing-gum; what he does with it will surprise you.

The chief detective is well-played by Victor McLaglen, and his rival is Edmund Lowe. These two actors played friendly adversaries in many films (going back to "What Price Glory?" in silent days) and their rivalry here is a pleasure to watch. Instead of teaming up to solve the murder, they work against each other.

I'll give "Guilty As Hell" seven and a half points out of 10 ... or 8 points if you like unconventional crime stories.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strictly for Lowe-McLaglen's Legions of Fans
JohnHowardReid3 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Generally speaking, it's true that film noir is most often associated with crime. But not all—indeed not even the majority—of police and detective dramas can justifiably be classified as noir (even though DVD distributors assume this is invariably the case). Take a movie like Guilty as Hell (1932), which certainly has a noirish title and a most promising poster. It starts off intriguingly too. In fact the opening sequence in which nice old Henry Stephenson (of all people) not only calmly murders his wife but then methodically arranges the evidence to convict her lover instead, is one of the most chillingly noirish I've ever seen. After this episode, however, the movie not only reverts with a vengeance to the original stage play, but becomes somewhat static, somewhat more conventional and somewhat less interesting.

The stage play, Riddle Me This by Daniel N. Rubin opened on Broadway at the John Golden on February 25, 1932 and ran a most satisfactory 100 performances. Frank Craven both directed and starred as Kirk, Robert Burton was Duffy, Robert Lowes (Frank Marsh), Erin O'Brien Moore (his sister), Thomas Mitchell (McKinley), and Charles Richman (Dr Tindal).

Starting with What Price Glory? in 1926 and ending with Call Out the Marines! in 1942, Edmund Lowe and Victor McLaglen partnered each other in ten features of which this is the fifth. Much as I would have preferred Frank Craven and Thomas Mitchell, we have to put up with an adequately obnoxious Lowe and an almost equally inadequate, camera-hogging McLaglen instead.

Fortunately, photographer Karl Struss often comes to the film's rescue. Struss had an excellent working relationship with director Kenton, who was only too pleased to allow Struss to perform whatever miracles he liked to give the film distinction and "class". The chilling opening sequence is most effectively photographed and cut. And there are other sequences too (the visit to the jail), in which Struss' mind-blowing lighting effects carry the picture. Struss's efforts to vary the monotony of the Lowe-McLaglen scenes by having the actors bob their heads straight into the camera is more obtrusive but certainly inventive. Despite Struss' efforts, however, 80 minutes of continuous Lowe-Mclaglen wrangling does tend to be rather wearying. But finally it all ends much as you might expect. True, the plot's resolution is not the neatest, but by that stage, you are past caring. You just want all the shouting to cease and that welcome The End title finally flash on the screen.

Stephenson sneaks off with the movie's acting honors (he has by far the best part and is given some harrowing "business"), but Fred Kelsey's eager Detective Duffy is not far behind, while Adrienne Ames seems certainly the goods as the attractive heroine. It's also a pleasure to see and hear Elizabeth Patterson as the witness/landlady.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
More interesting for its direction than its story
gridoon202427 July 2020
This "will-he-get-caught?" (as opposed to a whodunit) story boasts some innovative, impressively mobile camerawork but is nearly ruined by Edmund Lowe's highly obnoxious (at least in the first half) character; when he makes fun of the dead body of a woman lying right in front of him and drops his cigarette ashes on her, he crosses a line that his later "redemption" ark by trying to help a damsel in distress cannot fully bring him back from. The opening sequence is certainly a grabber. **1/2 out of 4.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that this is a Pre-Code picture!
planktonrules12 January 2020
The early 1930s up to July of 1934 was an interesting time in Hollywood. In this so-called 'Pre-Code' period, the Production Code governing what content was and wasn't allowed in films was generally ignored. Sure, there was a Code, but it meant almost nothing to the studios. If you see many of these films today, you might be shocked to see content they never would have allowed up until the 1960s or later. Homosexuality, adultery, fornication, abortion, extreme violence and occasional nudity were what you might see in a Pre-Code film....though of course not all Pre-Code films were so salacious.

When it comes to "Guilty as Hell", you have a great example of a movie that clearly belongs to the Pre-Code. After all, you could rarely ever curse in films after mid-1934 and only then if you received special dispensation, such as with Rhett Butler's famous last line in "Gone With the Wind".

The story starts with a graphic strangling..seen in the glasses of the murderer. When the police and medical examiners arrive, so does a snappy-talking reporter, Russell Kirk (Edmund Lowe). His bloodhound instincts brought him here and it soon becomes apparent that he's a bit of a jerk with a sick sense of humor. Soon it becomes apparent that this is a film like so many during the 1930s and 40s, where a non-professional ends up working on the case and makes the cops look like idiots. These idiots manage to catch the wrong man who ends up getting convicted for the killing...and it's up to Kirk to make things right and catch the real killer.

This role is a bit unusual for Lowe, as he generally played sophisticated, well-dressed guys. Here, he is dressed in a crummy wrinkled suit with a battered hat! And, he seems about as cultured as moldy cheese! The film also suffers a tad because the identity of the real murderer seems a bit obvious. But the film still is quite good...enjoyable albeit familiar.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Far From Fox
boblipton8 December 2019
Doctor Henry Stephenson calmly strangles his wife, walks out the front door and goes to a medical conference to lecture his audience on "How to Grow Old". By the time Police Homicide Captain Victor Maclaglen and reporter Edmund Lowe show up, the dead woman's lover, Richard Arlen, is set up to be framed. When Lowe sees Arlen's sister, he decides that anyone with a sister as lovely as that can't be a murderer.

Edmund Lowe seems a lot more relaxed and natural in a three-piece suit and a battered trilby than he does in his usual evening clothes. In addition, there seems to be one-way chemistry between him and co-star Victor McLaglen, strangely far afield from their usual haunts at Fox. Of course, there their pairing commanded the best directors, while at Paramount, they had Erle Kenton -- not a bad director, but one used to letting his comic stars have their own way. He also seems to let cinematographer Karl Strauss do what he wants to, resulting in big shadows thrown against walls from low sidelights, in an ur-Noir fashion, while the camera occasionally retreats to an upper corner to gaze down at the players, or goes in for a mildly fish-eyed close-up.

What these were supposed to accomplish is unclear to me. Struss had come to Hollywood by way of New York and portrait photography. Like Arlen, his career was on the downslide, called in as often for uncredited work as for credited, and the projects he got a formal credit after 1935 were usually for smaller, more specialized producers, like Chaplin or Hal Roach. He lit his last set in 1959, and died 22 years later, aged 95.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The camera is right in your face.
mark.waltz12 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
With a photographer so close to the actors that you can see every line in their face, a finger pointing directly into the lense and jarring movements in very tense situations, wrist is film art at its very best. it is a story of an elder man who murdered his wife, framing another for it and pretty much getting away with it almost up until that man's execution. The fact that it's the normally noble Henry Stephenson is shocking enough, but his methods are ingenious up to arranging for radio to turn on automatically to give him an alibi after he has killed her. Adrienne Ames is certain that her brother Richard Arlen, who was involved with the deceased, is Innocent, but the presence of a broken watch that belonged to him set up for the hangman's noose.

Detective Edmund Lowe and Victor McLaglen, paired regularly from the silent era through the 1940's, are together again as the detectives on the case, and they are great as usual. There's also Elizabeth Patterson as the frantic landlady, Fred Kelsey as the dumber than a box of rocks copper, and Ralph Ince and Noel Francis as accomplices of Stephenson's. this is a delight from start to finish, one of the great pre-code murder mysteries (with plenty of comedy), and one that should be delighted to watch play out. The great script aids the photography, and Paramount art direction team does a terrific job making this glamorous in addition to suspenseful.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed