What Men Want (1930) Poster

(1930)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
More fun than sitting on a tack...
AlsExGal12 September 2009
... maybe. I try to view every early talking/late silent era film I can get my hands on since I am so interested in that era of film history. However, this one is just pure torture. The lifeless acting, the title card text converted to dialog, and the very predictable plot all add up to being an experience you have to really commit yourself to or else you'll never make it through the required 65 minutes.

The plot is something like "Broadway Melody of 1929" in the sense that it is about two sisters who love the same man. The older sister, Lee(Pauline Starke), has been kept by a rich sugar daddy, Howard, for an extended period of time when she decides she wants marriage. She thinks that wealthy young Kendall Phillips (Ben Lyon) loves her and wants marriage too, and she knows that Howard does not want to ever marry anyone. So she breaks it off with Howard and sets her sights on Kendall, but then her younger sister Babs (Barbara Kent) comes to town and captures Kendall's eye. Meanwhile the rejected sugar daddy Howard (Robert Ellis) has just finished producing a generous divorce settlement for his client Mabel (Carmelita Geraghty). For some reason that is never really divulged, Mabel delights in inserting herself into this love quadrangle. She doesn't push it any direction, she just sits around cattily and well-dressed and seems to enjoy everyone else's suffering.

It's hard to believe that this very pedestrian relic that is the embodiment of everything bad about early talking film was made a few months after the same studio made "All Quiet on the Western Front", one of the best films of all time, much less the early 1930's. The reason behind this, though, is one of the very few reasons to view this film.

Carl Laemmle ran Universal Studios in one capacity or another from 1912 until 1936, when the Laemmle family lost control of the studio due to bad debts and the Great Depression. Part of what led to this can be seen in this film. Carl Laemmle was a great believer in nepotism - one popular saying of the day was that "Carl Laemmle had a very large faemmle" - and he never let any of his relatives go hungry for lack of a job. Ernst Laemmle, Carl's nephew, was the director of this film. In the 1920's Ernst had directed a multitude of the B-Western silents that were the bread and butter of Universal from its founding up to the dawn of sound, and this was his first American talking film. The dismal result was too much for even uncle Carl and Ernst never directed again - for Universal or anyone else. He was washed up at the age of 30.

As for the cast, they're not related to Uncle Carl, but they are all holdovers from the silent era and just can't make that leap to sound. Pauline Starke had a good career in silents, even playing the lead in the excellent "The Viking" just two years earlier. However, here she comes across like cardboard. She'll make only three more appearances in B films over the next thirteen years. Carmelita Geraghty had a similar professional trajectory - star in the silent era, forgotten after sound. Although, I have to say that she and Barbara Kent show the most signs of life in the film and actually put in the best performances. It's odd that the film is entitled "what men want" but we actually see more of what women do to get men to think they want them than anything else.

At any rate, this one is still very much with us, although usually in badly duped DVD's from old VHS tapes, so if you think you've got the stomach for it, you might want to view it and see the uneven output and nepotism of the first incarnation of Universal Studios at work.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What Movie Fans Don't Want!
JohnHowardReid17 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
A real dud from VintageFilmBuff comes in the form of a Universal "comedy" entitled What Men Want. The DVD itself is excellent – it's just the 1930 movie that's lousy. The last movie directed by Ernst Laemmle (a nephew of the studio's boss, Carl Laemmle, Ernst Laemmle was a prolific director of shorts in the silent era), it's a dull comedy with an obviously embarrassed Ben Lyon romancing the younger sister (an immature – if actually 22 years old at the time – Barbara Kent) of the woman (a too mature Pauline Starke – only 29 when this film was made, but the camera is not kind to her) who wants him herself. I can't imagine why! Admittedly, some of the other candidates are even less inspiring. Wait a minute! It's Hallam Cooley who's really pestering Pauline to marry him, so I guess even a tame Lyon is preferable to a persistent Cooley!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It's Not Complicated, Except For the Women
boblipton21 October 2023
They want sex, of course: easy, consequence-free sex. So we get this pre-code movie in which Pauline Starke gives up her life as Robert Ellis' lover, because she's fallen in love with Ben Lyon. Ellis has been willing to pay, in gifts, in trips to Europe, in tips on the stock market. But now she's in love, and wishes to gives herself to Lyon. Ellis, a gentleman, says good luck, and changes that stateroom on the ship to a single.... then changes his mind. Something might turn up. Someone might turn up. Miss Starke might turn up.

What women want, apparently, is far more complicated. They want others to be happy. So when Lyon turns his attention to Miss Starke's sister, Barbara Kent, she's willing to step asde and let Miss Kent have a grand time. But it isn't so easy for Miss Kent, because....

This is one of those pre-code movies which promises much, like a wild party, with Miss Starke egged on to appear dressed in a turban and nothing else, but doesn't. Necking couples politely get out of the way of other couples who wish to neck. And, in the end, nothing much changes, because women are so noble, and men, however much they may try to be honorable when they feel they should, don't have to.

Phooey.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed