Rain (1929) Poster

(1929)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Urban Raindrops
FerdinandVonGalitzien7 August 2009
Summertime wasn't made for a German count…. There are a lot of dangers outside the cosy gloomy of the Schloss; as for example, hordes of tourists who invade everyplace in order to take the most useless souvenirs or take useful pictures of this Herr Graf's Schloss,(However, this a minor problem that is solved easily by loosing a pack of hungry and ferocious Alsatian hounds). And besides this nuisance one has to deal with the rays of the sun that put at risk the characteristic aristocrat skin color not to mention the heat that can have terrible consequences for the aristocratic body, even sweat.

So, in order to avoid the summertime dangers and while hoping and sighing for the cold and dark winter, this German count decided the short film "Regen" ( Rain ), directed by Herr Joris Ivens in the silent year of 1929, was the perfect choice for the Schloss theatre. Herr Ivens was a Dutch filmmaker who experimented with the avant-garde, and "Regen" is one of the most avant-garde of Dutch films, a work that besides refreshing the atmosphere and the aristocratic mood, is a beautiful symphony of delicate water. It is deceptively simple but the artful visual composition made by Herr Ivens is evocative, sensitive, even nostalgic, a splendid collection of images about the daily and rainy life in an European city or how the rain is unchanging.

The film montage is absolutely brilliant, a gallery of images that depict a simple but lovely story of urban raindrops. It celebrates one of those remarkable little things that unfortunately go unnoticed, until Herr Ivens' skillful experimental direction, shows us the greatness and beauty of a rainy day.

And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because this German Count must meet a fat and rich Teutonic heiress, rain or shine.

Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com/
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unique Look at the Beauty of Rain
springfieldrental13 July 2022
Rain is the essence of earth's survival. Dutch documentary filmmaker Joris Ivens looked at rain not for its life's essence, but for its aesthetic qualities when it's photographed on the landscape. Two-years in the making, December 1929's "Rain," or "Regen" in Dutch, creatively captures images rain creates everywhere it falls. Ivens and colleague Mannus Franken not only produced a scientific polemic on what causes water to fall from the sky, but unfolds the beauty of rain as it lands on fields, trees, city streets and bodies of water. The visual effects have been interpreted as moving paintings. Instead of illustrating one moment in time like artists do on canvasses, the images filmed by Ivens show a sequence in time. His editing between clips creates a fluidity that static painting, sculpture and still photography have shown to be impossible to duplicate.

Loosely belonging to the cinematic 'city symphonies,' Ivens departs from the genre by avoiding humans in relation to man-made machines. He focuses instead on the environmental relationship of rain to nature and society. The documentarian, whose later fame was attributed to his series on the Vietnam War, has been praised by the avant-garde and the experimental film community by his unique perspective on rain. Much of his shots consists on the movement of water, through falling droplets of rain on puddles, ponds and solid objects. His unusual camera angles capture an element of rain normally not appreciated by people scampering to shelter to escape from being wet.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Poetic documentary
Polaris_DiB16 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Joris Ivens early poetic documentary stuff pretty much set the stage for observational and artful film in general. Regen is pretty simple, he records people's reactions when rain begins to fall, the effect of rain on the atmosphere, landscape, inhabitants, and animals, and almost joyfully rides along with the tide as it sparkles throughout the streets. Some very striking images are captured, especially off of the reflections the rain causes in puddles on the ground, with special attention to a series of shots where crowds with their umbrellas become almost abstract starburst designs.

The music on the Avant-Garde: Experimental Cinema of the 1920s and 1930s version of this film is really bad. That collection has some really good accompaniment music and really bad accompaniment music, and this might be one where you just watch it silently. Or, you can provide your own music, as one of the things great about this film is that it's so metrically edited that it can fit into many a beat.

--PolarisDiB
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A brief poem
albertochimal23 November 2001
This early dutch short film will confuse everyone who thinks cinema is a medium only fit to tell stories. Predating some of the most interesting --and lyrical-- documentaries of recent times, devoid of spoken words or any logical discourse, "Regen" offers a few, brief impressions of a rainy afternoon in Amsterdam; they do not form a sequence, they do not tell anything, but they definitely convey a sense of melancholy and quietness. If a conventional movie is the equivalent of a novel, or a short story, this should be regarded as a poem: it is concerned not with what's next, but with what's there, with perceptions of things.

Fans of Ron Fricke's "Baraka", Godfrey Reggio's "Powaqqatsi", or Peter Greenaway's "Prospero's Books", should try to find this relatively unknown film. The poetry of its images, underlined by its beautiful score, is truly memorable.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Simple masterpiece
chuckyp5551 November 2006
This is a short documentary from the city-symphony genre of film in the early era of film. Unlike most city symphonies, Rain has more of a narrative structure as it shows Amsterdam and it's inhabitants immediately before, during, and after the rainfall. The gentle melodic strumming of guitar accompanies the various images and provides for an added tranquil experience. The film is shot using often obscure angles and close ups of images out of their normal range of view. As it was made during the silent era, there are no words to taint the beauty/ experience and the images are allowed to speak for themselves- while each viewer is allowed to connect and relate their own experience with the anticipation of rain. The film is short and sweet and perhaps one of the most naturally compelling visions of early or even later cinema. If you have the rare opportunity to view this piece of art, I highly suggest it.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Poem Film from the 1920s
dickwhyte23 March 2007
The above review strikes me as particularly unhelpful for people who are actually interested in avant-garde, and poetic cinema. Yes it is slow, if you were expecting an action movie, and yes it is a silent film, but there are very few silent films which explore the poetry of the banal, the sublime everydayness of existenz. To me, it is one of the most beautiful and subtle films of all time, and is one of the first genuine "poem" films (along with H20 by Ralph Steiner, Manhatta by Paul Strand, Berlin: City of a Symphony by Walter Ruttman, and $24 Island by Robert Flaherty among others).

The French philosopher Gilles Deleuze (in his book on cinema, The Movement-Image) gives a wonderful reading of this film in which he argues that the film is no longer a representation of rain, but is attempting to give the viewer the feeling, or pure "quality" of rain, called a "qualisign". The editing is not unlike Robert Bresson in the fragmentation and use of what Deleuze calls the "any-space-whatever". In Rain the shots do not have a signed linear sequence, and have no forward movement in time (there is no character moving through the spaces, nothing to make one shot "before" or "after" another one in time). This means that all of the shots could have happened all at the exact same time, theoretically. This is one of the qualities of an any-space-whatever, a space in which the spatial and temporal potentials are de-connected (unlike a fiction or documentary film which has cohesive spatial and temporal dimensions).

Amazing movie which has gone on to influence many great poem-film-makers like Stan Brakhage, Marie Menken, Joanna Margaret Paul, Nathaniel Dorsky, Alexander Greenhough, myself and many others.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great study of ''"R"''A"'I"'N"''
Artpix1 January 2005
I just recently found out about Joris Ivens and is awe-inspired by the amount of pieces he made.

This piece is a study about RAIN in the city. It is a beautiful montage of images,reflections,closeups,and people in the city.

His work reminds me of Georgia O'Keefe's, work as an artist. Her work was based on bringing hidden details out into the open, I feel much the same way about Ivens. The slowness of the film gives one time to think about the images, and I like that. Unlike most films today, in and out as quickly as possible.

A must see by any image loving artist.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
RAIN {Short} (Mannus Franken & Joris Ivens, 1929) **
Bunuel197616 January 2014
More stuff from Kino's first "Avant-Garde" collection, this was my introduction to the work of celebrated Dutch documentarian Ivens and two more of his films would follow in quick succession. Unfortunately, it would seem that "artists" dabbling in film during the 1920s were hung up on the element of water (in all its forms and sources) since this is the sixth such short I have watched over the last few days, following in the footsteps of Man Ray, Dimitri Kirsanoff, Ralph Steiner, Herman G. Weinberg and Pare Lorentz! As had previously been the case, this is one of those experimental "cine-poems" that were the order of the day in artistic circles at the time they were made but which are more often read about – in fact, this is also included in "Wonders In The Dark's All-Time Top 3000 movies" list I am currently perusing – than actually seen and which nowadays offer precious little instructional or entertainment value.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You should see it without sound
p_radulescu26 April 2007
I watched Regen yesterday, for the first time. I had read a lot about it and was expecting a masterpiece. Something was not there - something was missing - or something was too much. I saw it for the second time. The images were fantastic - but something was impeding me to feel the masterpiece.

I thought that I was too tired - Regen was coming after two hours of watching other short movies, by Epstein, Eisenstein, Weinberg ... So I was definitely tired.

I took a break and went to the kitchen to eat something, then I came back. I saw it once more. I had an idea - I cut the sound - and I saw Regen again - and now I felt the masterpiece! It is a masterpiece. Only in its simplicity it has a grandeur, a greatness - and the music (which is fine) is not at the same level of greatness - of simplicity and greatness.

I saw it then several times - it is like a spell, it is binding you.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Rainy day
Horst_In_Translation20 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This is a Dutch short film running for 14 minutes and it was made over 85 years ago, back in 1929. It was written and directed by Mannus Franken and Joris Ivens, maybe the most famous filmmaker from the Netherlands. Unfortunately, there is nothing too great about this silent black-and-white film here. All we see is impressions from a rainy day somewhere in Holland. We see streets, we see people, we see rivers, but I just could not see any real value in here that goes beyond the level of something an amateur filmmaker could come up with. I am a bit surprised this has such a high rating. There is nothing truly bad about it though, it's simply not interesting and even drags a little at this short runtime. Not recommended.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slippery when Wet
tieman6423 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The 1920s saw a number avant-garde artists producing short, experimental films. One of the more famous of these is "Rain", a 1929 short by Joris Ivens.

Ivens' earliest films were strictly aesthetic exercises. He began as a lyrical or observational poet but slowly drifted toward social realism and then activism. Ivens says this himself in interviews, in which he describes "Rain" as being "without social content", a fact which he "would later seek to rectify". In this regard, the film is primarily concerned with observing as raindrops envelop the city of Amsterdam. Humans are kept at a distance and Ivens focuses more on umbrellas, streets, puddles, buildings and rivers; the movement of water and the slow dampening of a city. This will seem trite to modern audiences, but cinema was in its infancy when "Rain" was released. Many well regarded critics, cinematographers and artists of the era championed it dearly (it was oft compared to Dziga Vertov's "Man With a Movie Camera", released months prior), including Vsevolod Pudovkin, one of the fathers of film theory.

Today, copies of "Rain" tend to be saddled with modern soundtracks. Most of these are best muted. At its best, the film conveys well the quality of rain, the transience of Nature and the smell/texture of water on stone. 100 years ago it was viewed as a work lyrical and transcendent, today, no doubt, as something primitive and thin.

Not many people know of Joris Iven. He'd make a series of documentaries in the 1920s, before being hired in the 1940s to make propaganda pieces for Dutch colonialist interests. Instead he'd use their money to make "Indonesia Calling", a film which assaulted the Neatherlands' role in Indonesia. His subsequent films focused on unionists, Belgian miners, worker strikes, the Soviet Union's Five Year Plan, the Spanish Civil War, Indonesia's attempts to shrug off the Imperial powers and China's resistance to Japanese invasion. Along the way, he'd become involved with various communists, radical left-wingers and thinkers, as well as Bertolt Brecht, Hans Eisler, Robert Oppenheimer and the great Herbert Marcuse. Throughout much of his life, Iven would be assaulted by people in power; the FBI classified him as being "dangerous" and "a possible Soviet agent", he'd be hounded by Netherlands' Intelligence Service, the Dutch wanted him jailed, frequently he'd have his equipment stolen or "delayed" and he was famously banned from entering several countries by none other than General Douglas MacArthur. He died in 1989.

7.5/10 – See "A Tale of the Wind".
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A lyrical impression of a rain shower in Amsterdam
movieman-18722 January 2001
This silent film from Holland depicts the start and affects of a rain shower in the city of Amsterdam. It is a very beautiful movie with a good score, but the movie is definitely slow. It is not particularly interesting either. It is just an old and simple silent film that is not especially important. If you get chance to see it, you should just to see how far film has come in 70 years.
1 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed