Die Nibelungen: Siegfried (1924) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Excellent cinematic adaptation; Excellent cinema
zetes24 September 2001
I'll say this up front: this film can move very slowly at points. Also, I saw it in a theater with live piano accompaniment, and it's likely to be much less impressive on a smaller screen. I doubt the video print is very good, since I am familiar with other tapes that that company has distributed. Despite its slow points, when Lang and crew create the numerous set pieces, watch out: you're in for some of the greatest scenes of filmdom. I'd also like to point out that, as someone who is quite familiar with the original poem, I'll tell you that source material often moves a lot slower than this film does. As a technical marvel, I don't think some of the stuff here was surpassed until very recently, except maybe in King Kong. It's even more amazing to behold than Metropolis, Lang's next and much more famous film. All of the effects might seem dated now, but anyone who appreciates early cinema will easily fall in love.

The film opens with Siegfried's infamous battle against the dragon. A bit of trivia: this scene is not in The Nibelungenlied. It is briefly mentioned in the first lay by Hagen as having happened a while ago. However, this is the one scene from this movie which is widely remembered, and for good reason. The dragon is amazingly created, nearly on the level of the dinosaurs from The Lost World and King Kong. Unlike them, though, it is a puppet and not stop motion. As far as puppetry goes, it surpasses most of the muppets of Return of the Jedi by leaps and bounds. Unfortunately, as lifelike as they made it, the dragon is not at all that fierce. It almost looks like a friendly dog (it even wags its tail as Siegfried valiantly rushes at it, sword aloft). When it is supposed to be roaring at Siegfried, the audience was giggling; it looked more like it was yelping. As a result, the depiction of Siegfried begins to come off as satirical (probably not intended, but it makes things more interesting). There is a major strain of Niebelungenlied scholarship which sees Siegfried not as the hero, but as the aggressor.

The second major set piece involves the battle with Alberich, the Nibelung, an episode that occurs a bit later in the poem, from whom he wins the cloak of invisibility, a horde of treasure, and Balmung, his famous sword. The mythological characters in this episode are awesome to behold in their costuming (and simply in the casting, which is perfect throughout; the creatues in the film's first scene, in which Siegfried is forging his sword, are great, too), especially the dwarves who balance the pot full of treasure on their backs.

The best scene in the film occurs in the next chapter, the dream of Kriemhild, which is animation done in sand. Other great scenes in the film include the crossing of the lake of fire, the battle between Brunhild and Gunther (with an invisible Siegfried helping him), the wooing of Brunhild, the quarrel between the queens, and the hunt. As far as I remember, only the war with Denmark is left out, which happens in the poem before they go to Iceland for Brunhild. It's not missed.

Special attention must be given to the miraculous casting. Paul Richter plays Siegfried as the hero to beat all heroes. With his blonde, flowing hair, he marches across the world blindly performing great deeds and talking to birds (the look on Richter's face when he starts to hear birds talk is priceless). He's too naive to see the trouble he causes as he dishes out treasure to the poor (a wonderful touch; Lang doesn't even draw attention to how this angers the Burgundians in their dialogue, but only in their expressions). As many scholars have proposed, Siegfried's actions all suggest that Worms is in iminent danger of being usurped by him. Margarethe Schoen may not have been the best choice for Kriemhild. The actress is so manly that I assumed that an actor was playing her. She is supposed to be the most beautiful woman in the world. The actress does emote quite well, however. Now, Hannah Ralph, who plays Brunhild, exudes a manliness that her part requires. She's supposed to be a warrior maiden. Ralph does a great job conveying Brunhild's cunning, bitterness, and cruelty. Theodor Loos, who plays King Gunther, is absolutely perfect. I couldn't have imagined him better. His face exhibits both his moral predicament and his supreme inadequacy that the poem spells out so clearly. Hans Adalbert Schlettow plays Hagen. His costume may be a bit overwrought (a huge, gnarly beard, a furry eye patch, and an enormous helmet with eagle wings reaching a foot and a half upwards), but the actor's perfect for the role, although he might be too old. His age makes me wonder how he's going to fight like a demon in Kriemhild's Wrath, the second part of the film, which I'll see tomorrow. I'm very eager to see how Lang and Thea von Harbou, his wife ans screenwriter, will make the remaining half of the epic interesting on film. It's nothing but battles. Volker and Gunther's brothers are also well cast, although they'll probably be more important in the second half, that is, if the poem is followed as closely as it is here. 8/10.
42 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Fantastical One
kurosawakira9 March 2013
I think this is an important film to see even for historical reasons, since after "Die Nibelungen" (1924) Lang would make "Metropolis" (1927), something for which he is best remembered. But more importantly, this is in my mind astonishingly gripping and the far more satisfying film (or two).

It's fascinating how different the two parts are. As they are, their respective brilliance shines brightly, individually, and in itself the film as one grand epic reinvents itself come the revenge story of the latter half. The first film is the fantastical one, precursor to what we have now as high fantasy adaptations, mainly "The Lord of the Rings". In this sense "Siegfried" is shockingly modern, and here Lang succeeds far better than in "Metropolis", where he didn't have a national epic upon which to project the visual aesthetics, instead his own sense of national identity projected into a perceived future or alternate present. This is surprisingly lucid, which itself is a testimony of its filmic brilliance.

The court at Worms is as rigidly symmetrical and foreboding as one can be, and the film is full of such visual information, rigid symmetry that I bet greatly inspired Eisentein's "Ivan Groznyi" films (1944, 1958). In fact, I would love to see these masterworks by the two directors together someday, since their similarities go beyond style and visual language, also converging in their handling of national folklore in highly theatrical terms.

The new restoration of the project, made by the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung, is available on Blu-ray in both Region A and B, courtesy of Kino and Masters of Cinema respectively. What a treasure! In fact, the more I think of it, I can't wait to revisit it again.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Your babbling, hero, is worse than murder"
Steffi_P23 November 2008
UFA's Die Nibelungen films have suffered from a problem common to Metropolis, King Kong and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, in that they are motion picture classics that also happen to have been favourites with Adolf Hitler. While those others I mentioned tend to be overlooked as coincidences – evidence of nothing more than that sometimes even fascist dictators have taste – the Nibelungen pictures have fared a little worse because of the significance of the legend to German nationalism, as typified in the opera by the German anti-Semite Wagner.

However, while the Nazis may have been able to project their racial ideology onto the original story, Fritz Lang's direction of the motion picture version actually breaks with the heroic nationalist reinterpretation. Wagner's opera was calculated to be exciting and rousing. Screenwriter Thea von Harbou would eventually become a nazi stooge, and probably intended a similar effect for the film. The original poem Nibelungenlied though is not intrinsically nationalistic – it is simply a folk tale in a similar vein the King Arthur legend or the Iliad, and Lang recognised this fact. Like those ancient sagas from which it is drawn, his version is lacking in any kind of emotional manipulation, yet is rich in pageantry and poetic imagery. In Die Nibelungen we in fact have a perfect example of how a director's formal technique can shape the tone of a film.

Throughout the picture, Lang takes a cool, detached approach to the material. There are few close-ups or point-of-view shots. We know that Lang was not averse to these techniques – look at his previous picture, Dr Mabuse, where the title character is often staring straight into the lens, as if to hypnotise the audience. Let's also compare the dragon slaying scenes from Die Nibelungen and the Douglas Fairbanks Thief of Bagdad (directed by Raoul Walsh). The important difference here is not who had the best dragon (and to be fair they are both pretty naff), but how they are filmed. For the Fairbanks legend to work, you have to get swept up in the action, and Walsh places the camera at the hero's back as he delivers the fatal blow, bringing the audience in for the kill too. Siegfried's fight is staged almost identically yet Lang just matter-of-factly shows it happen, even giving us the dragon's death indirectly with a shot of its tail flopping to the ground.

All this is not to say that Lang did not have respect for the Nibelungen story. He had great reverence for it, but again purely in the form of an old legend – an artefact of a bygone era, not something that a modern audience can or should try to relate to, but something profound and beautiful nonetheless. Lang reflects this in the overall look of the picture, forming neat, painterly tableau, encouraging exaggerated, theatrical acting and giving the overall picture a stylised sense of rhythm. Ironically he brings it close to opera in tone, although of course this version was in no other way like Wagner's.

Lang's distinctive visual style pervades Die Nibelungen. So far, Lang had made striking use of interiors, but Siegfried's story mostly takes place outdoors. There are no rolling vistas here though. Lang creates a claustrophobic landscape out of crowding forests and overbearing rock formations. In earlier Lang films we can already see how his sets and shot compositions seem to form patterns and paths to hem in the characters and even control their movements, but now the actors almost seem to become part of the scenery. Take for example a shot about two-thirds of the way through, when Brunhild is framed between two curtains – the pattern on her dress matches that on the curtains. Throughout his career Lang first and foremost shoots the sets – the actors are merely a part of them.

This thoroughly Langian interpretation of the Nibelungenlied may have brought a tear to the eye of Hitler and Goebbels, but the emotional connection to the material can only have existed in their heads. To the majority of viewers, this picture and its sequel do not encourage any kind of romantic or heroic feeling. They are in a way more of an illustration than a story in their own right. While this detached style does not make for gripping viewing, the films do have an aesthetic beauty to them that makes them watchable.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Before Lord of the Rings, there was...
OttoVonB6 January 2007
Upon completing his epic crime film "Dr Mabuse", Fritz Lang embarked on a quest to bring Germanic legend Das Niebelungenlied to the screen. So colossal was the undertaking that it required two films, of which "Siegfried" is the first.

Young heroic Siegfried kills a dragon and bathes in its blood, gaining immortality (save for a fatal weak spot). His quests make him into a powerful figure and allow him to court the beautiful princess Kriemhield. But her weakling brother only approves the lovers' union if Siegfried agrees to help him deceive the beautiful Valkyrie Brunhield into falling in love with him. When she eventually discovers this treachery, the humiliated amazon vows sets forth a cycle of revenge that will create tragedy on an epic scale.

There's no way to avoid comparisons: "Die Niebelungen" is the Lord of the Rings of its day, and easily one of the most staggering epics in the history of movies. The scale, extras and the pioneering dragon-slaying scene all make for enduring cinema. Fritz Lang's alluring visuals push it even further: his awesome depiction of the rigid codes of honor that are the undoing of his characters imbues the film with a mood and atmosphere whose influences are incalculable. "Die Niebelungen" can also be read as one chooses, tribute to German heroism or to the trappings and tragedy of "honor". Hitler for one was so impressed with the film that he used an alternate edit of the film as propaganda, playing to Wagner's Niebelungen opera (which Lang actually loathed!). To be fair, though the original score can not hope to reach the mythical heights of Wagner's opera, it is still a considerable achievement.

Though he would revisit the crime genre with the slick "Spies" and practically invent modern science-fiction with "Metropolis", none of Lang's silent films would reach this level of excellence. "Siegfried" of course can only fairly be judged when seen right before the second half of the saga: "Kriemhield's Revenge", in which formality makes way for chaos and petty jealousy and revenge turn to violence on a biblical scale.

Anyone with even a passing interest in the silent era or film as a whole should avidly seek this out. Kino on Video have a very decent double DVD edition. I wholeheartedly recommend it.

Edit (October 2010): As I add these words, Eureka have released a stellar BluRay of this saga which is just mind-blowing (reviewed by dvdbeaver, for the curious). If you've never seen this film yet, lucky you. Go straight to HD!
36 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superb fantasy
mohaas11 May 2000
I saw this on the big screen with live organ accompaniment (from the original film score) last night and I'm glad I did. Most people don't know Fritz Lang for anything before *Metropolis*, but this is a film which, to my mind, matches the best of what he has done. It's incredible to see what they were able to do with the wild set design. The score was suitably intense at moments. And the story was a pretty touching one about the fall of Siegfried.

The scenes I was amazed by in particular are: the dragon-slaying sequence (which, at first, elicited laughs because of the obvious artificiality of the creature but then got sounds of pity as he lay slain with blood shooting from his torso); Kriemhild's dream sequence, which has to be the earliest example of animation I've seen (the animation and accompanying music are pretty dark and disturbed--they gave me the creeps); and the approach to Brunhilde (with an incredible sea of fire). What I've come away with is even more of an appreciation for what filmmakers were capable of in the silent period. It seems clear after a film like *Siegfried* that silent film was not an infant technology waiting for sound but was an artform of its own.

All in all, I'd say this is a must-see. It's clearly not just preparation for the "great" films of Lang to come (like *Metropolis* and *M*), but is on par with any of the best of his stuff. This and *Dr. Mabuse, the Gambler*, both Lang films which are rarely screened, should be caught if at all possible.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best adventure movies ever
riddion3 June 1999
When I saw this wonderfully exciting adventure film, it got me thinking, "Why can't people make films like this anymore?". Partly why the film makers don't make films like this anymore is that they are so occupied in having the best special effects around and don't give a hoot about the characters, story or detail (Jurassic Park, Lost World, Independence Day, Armageddon are only a small part). I would love to go and see a film that have real characters from these make-believe worlds. There are so many movies today that have Americans in a make-believe world, acting and talking like Americans, this makes me sick all over. This movie has real characters we care about in a believable world. This is partly why I love silent films so much. It is the acting and not the dialog that the viewer gets to know the character through.

This film has all the elements that makes up for a good adventure film. Very good story, exciting action, wonderful sets, beautiful photography, chillingly wonderful villains and some of the best special effects I've seen (for the time's standard). I especially love the trick photography to make Siegfried invisible and casting a shadow even though he is. I'm looking forward to watching Kriemhild's Revenge.

If you haven't seen this movie and love adventure movies, see it. It is so exciting and magical that you'll remember it always when you see a bad adventure movie, something that is normal today.
27 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
one of the great masterpieces of world cinema
RKIRCHHOFF2 June 2003
essential viewing (and listening)...the newly-restored Munich Film Archives dvd of this film is simply wonderful. the G. Huppertz score is a marvel (lovingly restored by Erich Heller making use of the widow's piano score). Kurosawa's tribute to this classic can be seen in his handling of the "siege of the third fire tower" in RAN)...and, of course, Kriemhild's vindictive widow was the model for the Wicked Witch in SNOW WHITE... a landmark of international cinema: not to be missed.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dare I say Lang's best?
MissSimonetta15 January 2020
Fritz Lang's DIE NIBELUNGEN: SIEGFRIED is absolutely astounding cinema, heroic, beautiful, tragic, and overwhelming in its scope. Even though I have been a fan of silent cinema for a decade now, I was intimidated to watch this film due to its length, but the two and a half hours went right by and now I am pumped to see the second installment. As someone who doesn't tend to enjoy "binge-watching," let me tell you, it is a great temptation to just drop my other obligations for the day and just continue this great story.

The most interesting part about this movie is that it both revels in and subtly critiques its main characters. There really isn't a good guy or a bad guy. All of the characters are in their own ways sympathetic, but they are also quite vicious, capable of violence, pettiness, and deceit. Their codes of honor come to fail them as one character after another vows vengeance for wrongs done to them.

After a greasy diet of banal modern blockbusters more interested in advertising the next sequel rather than telling a compelling story, this is such a wonderful alternative.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A classic epic adventure
Rosabel9 September 1999
This film depicts the epic story of the rise and fall of the great German hero, Siegfried. It follows the classic pattern of the young hero who overcomes one challenge after another, only to be defeated in the end through his own weakness. Siegfried's early adventure, where he fights and slays the dragon, is masterfully filmed, with a special-effects monster that is amazingly sophisticated for its era. Further tests of his valour and cunning are required before he can marry the Burgundian princess, Kriemhilde; chief among these are assisting his future brother-in-law, Gunther, the King of Burgundy, to win the hand of the Amazon queen, Brunhild. Aided by a cloak of invisibility, Siegfried fixes the contests between Gunther and Brunhild to defeat the imperious queen and delivers her unwillingly to Gunther. This service ultimately leads to his downfall, however, as he eventually confides in Kriemhilde his duplicity and she betrays his secret to the outraged Brunhild, who then seeks his death. Despite being made in the midst of the Expressionist era of filmmaking in Germany, this movie is largely naturalistic in its sets and acting. The Burgundian court, as befits its artificial and ceremonious atmosphere, is depicted through angular and stiff sets and costumes, somewhat reminiscent of the expressionist style, but there are not the disturbing distortions seen in such classic films as "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari".
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Magnificent Poetic Saga of Siegfried
claudio_carvalho24 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Canto 1: How Siegfried Slayed the Dragon: Siegfried (Paul Richter), the son of King Siegmund, forges a sharp sword and hears stories from the locals about Princess Kriemhild (Margarete Schön). He decides to go to Worms to win Kriemhild. Along his journey, he kills a dragon and baths in its blood to become invincible.

Canto 2: How Bolker, the Bard, Sang of Siegfried in Front of Kriemhild and How Siegfried Came in Worms: Siegfried fights and defeats the dwarf King of the Realm of the Nibelungen Alberich (Georg John) that was wearing his wonder cap that makes the user unseen or in whatever form he wishes. Alberich asks Siegfried to spare his life and in return he gives the Treasure of the Nibelungen and the Balmung sword. Siegfried makes twelve kings as his vassals, and when he asks the hand of Kriemhild to her weak brother King of Burgundy Gunther (Theodor Loos), he advises that he would accept is Siegfried helps him to win the strong Queen of Iceland Brunhild (Hanna Ralph).

Canto 3: How Siegfried Won Brunhild for Gunther: Siegfried wears the invisible helmet and helps Gunther to win Brunhild in the proofs of throwing stones and spear and jumping.

Canto 4: How Brunhild Enters Worms and How the King Celebrate Their Wedding: Brunhild tells Gunther that she is her captive but not his bride. Gunther asks Siegfried to help him again in his wedding night, and Siegfried takes his form and accidentally brings Brunhild's armlet with him.

Canto 5: How After Half a Year, Siegfried's Gift to His Bride, The Nibelungen Treasure, Arrives in Worms and How the Two Queens Quarrel With Each Other: When Kriemhild finds Brunhild's armlet, Siegfried tells her how her brother won the queen. While going to the mass, Kriemhild and Brunhild quarrel and the offended Kriemhild discloses the truth to her brother's wife.

Canto 6: How Gunther Betrayed Siegfried: Brunhild lies to Gunther and tells him that she lost her virginity with Siegfried. Gunther organizes boar hunting in the Odenwald Forest and asks Hagen Tronje (Hans Adalbert Schlettow) to slain Siegfried. Hagen lures Kriemhild and she tells the vulnerable part of Siegfried's body where the lime leaf has fallen. Brunhild fasts, Gunther betrays Siegfried, and Hagen impales him with a spear.

Canto 7: How Kriemhild Swears Revenge to Hagen Tronje: Brumhild tells Gunther that she lied and he killed his only loyal friend. Then she dies of starvation. Kriemhild swears revenge to Hagen.

The magnificent poetic saga of Siegfried is told through seven cantos, in one of the most beautiful fantasies ever. The story has drama, adventure, romance, betrayal and stunning special effects for a 1924 movie, when cinema was very incipient and technology primitive. However, the solid screenplay with a perfect development of the characters, the excellent performances of the cast and the awesome direction of Fritz Lang produced an epic ahead of time. It is inevitable the comparison of this masterpiece with "The Lord of the Rings", both unforgettable fantasies. My vote is ten.

Title (Brazil): "Os Nibelungos – Parte 1: A Morte de Siegfried" ("The Nibelungen: The Death of Siegfried")
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Looks impressive for it's time but I just found it boring.
bretttaylor-040224 September 2021
It was too long. I don't know if I'm missing something in these silent films that have high praise. I thought the Dragon looked impressive and has to be the best visual effect up to that point in history. I did not like how the Dragon was just minding it's own business drinking water and then Siegfried just killed it for no apparent reason other than to say "I just killed a dragon" he then can understand birds and one tells him to cover himself in the dragons blood to become invincible but a leaf lands on his back and the blood misses that spot. He also helps a king cheat to defeat a Queen using an invisibility cloak he got earlier. I dont think hes a very noble hero personally.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the great masterpieces of any generation
pekinman4 May 2009
I am not especially an aficionado of silent films though I have long loved Lang's 'Metropolis'. Being an opera lover, especially Wagner, it is to my shame that it has taken me decade to get around to watching Lang's masterpiece 'Siegfried'.

Even more than Richard Wagner's 4 Ring operas in 'Der Ring des Nibelungen' Lang's films tie in many of the ancient Nordic and Teutonic legends that contributed to Wagner's monumental creation.

Brunhild is a powerful Icelandic Queen, Siegfried the son of King Siegmund, all this quite different from the operas in that Siegmund was not a king in those. Also, Hagen, the evil deus ex machina is portrayed here as a Wotan like figure, with patched eye and horned helmet. Otherwise, the basic story is the same but more believable as drama than Wagner's highly fantastic story line.

This film is going to last a lifetime with me. And it is especially wonderful that the great musical score by Gottfried Huppertz has been included in the DVD release on Kino films. Its a haunting score and very much its own character. It doesn't try to imitate Wagnerianism but there are what Wagner called leitmotivs to represent the various characters and mood.

Even if you aren't a Wagner fan this film by Fritz Lang displays so many amazing innovations for 1924 that it puts the computerized f/x of our day quite in the shade in terms of novelty and human artistry.

I can't recommend 'Siegfried' highly enough. Haunting and beautiful, even in black and white. The Kino picture is quite clear and the acting superb.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Astounding to look at
The_Void18 May 2006
It has to be said that, technically, the first part of Fritz Lang's epic fantasy adventure is an absolutely stunning piece of cinema, especially given the time in which it was made. However, over eight decades on, the film hasn't aged all that well...but that's a criticism that doesn't bear much weight. The film is almost two and a half hours long, and this running time becomes even more astounding when you consider that there's another equally long segment to follow! Die Nibelungen is adapted from Nordic legend and works from a screenplay written by the genius Fritz Lang and his wife at the time, Thea von Harbou; who also worked with Lang on his most famous works; M and Metropolis. The plot follows the heroic Siegfried, who travels to Worms after hearing of the beautiful sister of the King, Kriemhild. However, in order to marry the beautiful Kriemhild, Siegfreud must first win a bride for her brother. The main reason why the film works is because, much like Metropolis; it's so astounding to look at. Lang gives the film a real sense of wonder by way of fantasy elements such as dwarfs and magic powers, and it's amazing that such a piece of cinema could have been made in 1924. The standout of the 143 minute running time is the section that sees our valiant hero slaying a dragon. The effects here are better than those that can be seen in some modern films today, and the fact that the director had the audacity to show a man fighting a dragon deserves respect. On a personal level, this film didn't do a great deal for me; but fans of classic art cinema won't be disappointed.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Lavish & Memorable Adaptation of the Saga
Snow Leopard21 July 2004
This lavish and memorable adaptation of the first part of the Nibelungen saga is worthwhile for a number of strengths. While Fritz Lang and Thea von Harbou seem to have rather freely adapted the original material, they succeeded beyond doubt in bringing the main characters to life and in creating a distinctive and interesting atmosphere for the story. The cast, likewise, do a good job in portraying their characters. The visual effects are uneven, and a couple of times they do not work all that well, but at other times they work wonderfully.

This first part of Lang's epic primarily covers the "Siegfried" part of the saga. Siegfried is the kind of near-perfect hero who can become rather dull in a hurry if the actor and director overdo it, but here Paul Richter works well in the role, and Lang effectively brings out the sometimes tangled connections between Siegfried and the other characters. These relationships are really the most interesting aspect of this part of the story, and Lang does well in keeping them the main focus for most of the time. Gunther, Hagen, Kriemhild, and Brunhild each have an interesting connection with Siegfried, and by giving the other characters a well-developed personality, the movie also enhances Siegfried's own identity.

The story moves rather slowly much of the time, in order better to develop the atmosphere and characters. This actually enhances the action and adventure sequences, giving them (and the movie as a whole) more substance. The picture works very well and, aside from a very small number of its visual effects, has held up well over the years.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A vengeful epic
Dr_Coulardeau20 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
FRITZ LANG - DIE NIBELUNGEN - 1924-2012

The interest of this film, this double feature is the fact it was produced and shot by Fritz Lang in black and white in 1924. This is a restored version that has been completed with various repairs and reconstructed elements. It was also colorized so that the very crude black and white was replaced by some light golden palette of various shades of this basic color. The result is extremely beautiful to the eye. The second great element is of course the setting, built or natural. It is impressive by its gigantic size, especially for the time. The trees and the forest scenes are awesome and forbidding. The castles, German or Hun, are enormous and extremely realistic. Then the acting is essential since it is a silent film to which a music track was added and at the time it was actually performed along with the film, live or maybe on the first records of the time.

Fritz Lang goes back to the very old saga of Siegfried and the Nibelungen, reaching beyond Wagner who had produced a purely Germanic series of four operas and what we could even consider a pure saga of German-centered nationalism. Fritz Lang corrects this simple vision of the pure Germans in their national culture of a time when the whole of Europe or nearly was under German rule or feudal control, with only one challenge in the east, the Huns and Attila. Fritz Lang centers his tale in two parts, first on Siegfried and then on his widow Krimhild and her vengeance which is at once avenged by one of the rare Nibelungen survivors.

The old saga is available today in print and I have dedicated some long article on it for some university journal in Avignon. This old saga is definitely singing and chanting the glory of the Nibelungen and the Germans but with a certain distance that Fritz Lang tries to recapture in a concentrated form. Those Nibelungen are heroes and strong only because they found no one to stop them along the way. They never had any enemy or opponent at their real level, able to defeat them in a square and fair battle. The end becomes very dubious with Fritz Lang who is projecting what he is feeling coming up in Germany and Europe in 1924, after Hitler's attempted coup in October 1922, his trial, and his conviction and sentence to four years of prison that in fact only lasted one year.

The film here shows that the Germans and the feudal vassalization of everyone behind one person who is the king of them all, but with some super-vassals or even some competitors from within or from without. The first film is exclusively centered on the betrayal against Siegfried from within the court of the King and even the family of the King. Betraying is like a birthmark with these Germans. There is always one individual who is jealous of the heroism of another, and he will kill him in any possible, generally dishonest way. But the second film goes a lot farther. Krimhild has sworn to get her vengeance and to kill the murderer, Hagen Tronje who is untouchable because of the allegiance that connects him to the King and the Nibelungen.

Using Attila, the King of the Huns, to get her vengeance is particularly vicious since she uses an eastern or even Asian challenger against the Germans to get the whole band of Nibelungen and quite a good party of knights and soldiers to celebrate her marriage with Attila and the birth of a child. But they came prepared, and they expected this treason. They then reveal that they are never going to accept a defeat, even an honorable defeat. So, they are burned inside Attila's castle and Hagen is finally killed by Krimhild, and yet at once one of the rare Nibelungen survivors kills her. Hagen, or some other knight on his side, had said "you don't know the Germans," to the Huns. The Germans are described as treacherous people, die-hard fighters, and even totally insane self-centered people who can have hundreds of simple people killed to reach one single act of vengeance, and yet the actor of this vengeance is killed by some other German on the spot.

It is quite obvious Fritz Lang is harping at the insane and absurd division or divisions of the Germans that lead them to inner strife and rivalries that can only come to fights, war acts, treacherous acts, and many other unhealthy political acts. This is the reflection of Germany in the 1920s that will lead directly to 1933: divisions between Communists and Social-Democrats, divisions between the left in general but definitely not unified, and the New National-Socialist party of Hitler who will reach power with a little bit more than 30% of the votes while the left, if they had been able to unify themselves could have won with quite a good margin over 50%. We all know what came after this unhealthy political and historical victory or defeat. Attila is not a myth in this fable but a real enemy in a way. It is the East. Does Fritz Lang only mean the Soviet Union or does he see even farther and mean Asia, think of Japan in this old historical time who will enter the war rather fast within an alliance with Germany and Italy. Maybe a little farfetched, but the Soviet Union is definitely closer at hand to be that kind of a competitor.

The film has a certain value in the long run because globalized humanity today is just the same. One camp, the west, is divided in the most obvious and ridiculous way and is unable to speak with one voice. They accuse one another to betray the whole world with capturing batches of COVID-19 vaccines for their own use, one side of the Atlantic against the other, and in the east, far from being only China, the challengers and competitors are simply doing their own business in the three quarters of the world this west does not consider, and they are little by little establishing a different world order with a very wide and open alliance against which the western factions are impotent because they would like to be able to do the same technologically and socially, but they are being sidetracked by their private property obsession that leads them to let private enterprises and interests dominate the market they control, and western politicians do not see that they control hardly one little third of the world and the big two other thirds are for grab for the various eastern and Asian countries who are all in a way or another in a controlled and regulated system, certainly not the free unregulated market economy of the west. Maybe not entirely unregulated in Europe but by far too much unregulated.

The historical distance and the beauty of the film will probably prevent the audience from seeing the discourse it holds on the present world, the present situation in the world. And in the west, they are so vainly convinced they are making history that they consider they do not have to study the forces that are at work in the world that definitely have more influence on history than the objectives of humans. The climate-change is reduced to something caused by humans whereas the whole geological history of the Earth is a vast succession of cycles that are visible in its changes in the climate and that can be measured in the ice of the polar areas with extremely great precision. We probably should not and should not have polluted, we probably can or could introduce policies that could reduce the pollution, but we cannot change the geological cycles of this earth. But we could rather easily tackle the demographic problem before it becomes too serious, and we are close to this point. Beyond this point, the population will have to be reduced and if we do not do it, nature, the earth, the climate will take care of the problem. Of course, the rich will migrate to Mars, or Venus if they have an erotic mind. But it is easy to see that then one or two or even three billion people will die of hunger, diseases, thirst, or simply accidental or brutal death. The earth will reset the clocks to some acceptable time. Then you can bet the rich will come back to take the control of the situation.

Thanks, Fritz Lang for this lesson in globalized philosophy.

Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a perfect adventure
lee_eisenberg11 May 2005
For those of you who don't know about it, "The Nibelungenlied" is to German literature what "Beowulf" is to English literature. The story of Siegfried, a warrior who must help a prince win a princess, was made into an ultra-cool movie by Fritz Lang. Most people might imagine 1920's cinema as primitive by today's standards, but this was a very good technical production. Whether it's Siegfried (Paul Richter) slaying a dragon, or becoming invisible to help the prince win a contest, every part of the movie has something neat.

A strange irony to this movie was what it almost did for Fritz Lang. Adolf Hitler loved the movie and used "The Nibelungenlied" to represent a "strong Germany". Joseph Goebbels asked Fritz Lang if he would like to make propaganda films for the Nazis. Fritz Lang said that he would think about it and quickly fled the country (in the United States, he continued turning out famous movies). Lang's wife, Thea Von Harbou, stayed in Germany and worked for the Nazi propaganda machine.

No matter. It's a great movie.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A unique and rare find!
aeowen-0339817 June 2019
Now I know Fritz Lang, director of 1927's Metropolis, had done films for pre-Nazi Germany, but not this!

An old film school professor had lectured on Lang for many occasions, and spoke of this movie often. I knew too based on it's age, from 1924, it would likely have been either destroyed in the second world war or just obscured. I did a number of months research time to find this, and was very impressed. This too was a time when cinema was epic, plus too I found this adaptation of Richard Wagner's magnum opus well within it's time. Just wish there were more movies like this to glorify the beginnings of film, but only a few still survive today.

One of Lang's very best. 10/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Titan of an Epic
Tweetienator15 July 2019
Fritz Lang tells us the whole "Nibelungen-Saga" in two silent movies: The Nibelungs: Siegfried and The Nibelungs: Kriemhild's Revenge. The story of the Nibelungs is an old epic saga called Nibelungenlied (Song of the Nibelungs), which dates back to a poem written around 1200 which is based on an far older oral tradition (5th or 6th century). Anyway, die Nibelungen-Saga is a great and fantastic epic and the silent movies are real masterpieces - and the drama is far greater than anything modern fantasy like Game of Thrones or Lord of the Rings provides us. I first watched both movies in a very young age and still find them ueber-fascinating.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I am less enthusiastic than some other reviewers
Philipp_Flersheim23 October 2022
Variants of the Nibelungen story have been told many times, most famously in the 13th-century German epic poem, in several Icelandic poems and of course by Richard Wagner in his four-part "Ring"-cycle. Here we have Fritz Lang's take on the material, based on a script by Thea von Harbou. The film covers roughly the first half of the mediavel epos up to Siegfried's death at the hand of Hagen. It has many strengths, notably the photography, which is stunning despite the almost static camera, and the sets and above all the costumes, which are beautiful. Some of the acting is also very good. For my taste, Brunhild (Hanna Ralph) stands out: She is as different from the typically blonde 'fat lady' of opera fame as anyone could possibly be (despite the ridiculous contraption that is supposed to be her helmet). Siegfried (Paul Richter) and Hagen (Hans Adalbert Schlettow) are doing very well, too. But the plot. Oh dear. I cannot imagine what was on von Harbou's mind when she worked on that script. Plot holes abound. Why is Siegfried (after all the son of a king) apprenticed to Mime the smith? Why is Mime trying to send him to his death? Why does Siegfried kill that poor dragon? Why is Hagen opposed to welcoming him at the Burgundian court? How has he learnt of Siegfried's strength? And of the linden leaf? And so on. It is possible to tell the story with convincing characters who have credible motives and reasons for their decisons: Wagner did so in his opera cycle, and there is no reason why you should not expect a cohrent plot in a film that came out in 1924. In this respect, von Harbou failed abysmally. Also, the plot is moving far more slowly than necessary. Many scenes are practically static tableaus - and again, this is not because "Die Nibelungen: Siegfried" is an early film. There are earlier ones that offer much more suspense: Think of "Der Student von Prag" (1913) or "Nosferatu" (1922), for example. In short, the pacing could have been better and Lang could have spent more time on character exposition and development. All in all the film leaves a mixed impression, but it certainly has more upsides than weaknesses. It is still very watchable.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The first great movie score
rfwilmut17 August 2021
Siegfried and its sequel, Kriemhild's Revenge, stand as an oustanding achievement of spectacular silent cinema, but are also of interest because of the music score used for the original showings.

Silent films often had special scores composed for the premieres and the biggest cinemas, but these were usually cobbled together from bits of Liszt and Mendelssohn. Even well into the 1930s film music was fairly primitive - honourable exceptions being King Kong (Max Steiner) and the 1933 Alice In Wonderland (Dimitri Tiomkin) - until Erich Wolfgang Korngold's symphonic scores for Captain Blood (1935) and other swashbuckling epics completely revolutionised film music.

For Die Nibelungen, ten years before Korngold, Gottfried Huppertz wrote a remarkable symphonic score, somewhat in the style of Wagner though not using any of Wagner's themes. Though not as complex in its construction as Korngold's scores, the themes are used in a Wagnerian manner for the various characters, and the music supports the very slow acting and gives it an epic strength and excitement - seen without the score the action often seems ponderous but the score supports it and makes it flow. It's a remarkable achievement for the period: Huppertz also scored Lang's Metropolis, but his Nibelungen score stands out as the first great film score.

Fortunately both films are available on Blu-Ray in excellent transfers and restored to their original length, together with the complete score.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Visually great, historically important, BUT VERY SLOW
stephenoles12 August 2019
I love the German silent period, but the films do tend to be slow-paced, which was the style at that place and time.

DIE NIBELUNGEN is much worth seeing, especially now it's been restored for Blu-Ray. Some of the special effects are remarkable for 1923 and the best scenes, like the invisible Siegfried helping the lily-livered Gunther beat Brunnhilde in an athletic contest, are marvelous.

The geometric patterns on the costumes and sets show the influence of modernism, maybe even Art Deco. It's well written, directed and cast, with maybe the one exception of Margaretha Schoen, lifeless to the point of catatonic as the princess and saddled with an ugly costume and ridiculous waist-length braids which seem to sprout from her ears. I don't blame Schoen so much as I would blame Lang, whose mechanical direction of actors could result in awkward, wooden performances, and the awful hair and costumes they gave her.

The pace really becomes a problem in the second half of SIEGRIED. As the story reaches its climax, the pace slows down almost to a dead stop, and the film dribbles on too long after the climax of Siegfried's death -- this isn't a spoiler since the actual full title of the film is SIEGFRIED'S DEATH.

Murnau's low-budget NOSFERATU, from 1922, is NOT slow, which helps make it one of the most popular German silent films. I adore Murnau but his famous THE LAST LAUGH is, if memory serves, as punishingly slow as much of this one. German silent cinema is a treasure trove of riches, but brisk pacing is generally not one of them.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
HIgh adventure fit the first great fantasy epic on film
jgcorrea24 October 2019
The Nibelungen is epic in origin, since it adapts a medieval poem. It uses the legendary and mythical suggestion of Middle Ages imagery . Like so many films that recreate medieval contexts (Lancelot du Lac by Bresson, Perceval le Gallois by Rohmer, The Name of the Rose), it features medieval spaces par excellence: forests , castles, fortifications, caves. Fritz Lang undertook a journey to the sources of Germanic national ¨epos¨ associated with the great legends that forged the spirit of that nation: heroes fighting against everything (dragons included), adventures in which the future depended not only on their heroic characters, but on their culture at large. Lang's way of telling it in 1924 was totally modern, and not at all literary, considering. The Nibelungen based its epic quality on rhythm, i.e. on a static cadence. Elements of photography / painting (image) and literary elements (rhythm) were combined to become pure cinema. The rhythm is slow and precise, that of typically Germanic gravity - a gravity that, far from introspective sobriety , is perhaps characteristic of the excessive, almost extravagant Wagnerian operas. We are exposed to a titanic duration, to a rhythm adequate for Titans, and to the transcendence of their relevant actions. Minimalism had no place here because it would hardly express whatever a great legendary story calls for: ¨Epos¨ is the name of the game, and what it's all about.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some good moments, some not-so-good
Horst_In_Translation23 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"Die Nibelungen: Siegfried" from over 90 years ago is the first of 2 Nibelungen film directed by Fritz Lang and written by him as well with Thea von Harbou, a truly prolific and successful duo. I will not go a lot into detail about the story as it is so extremely famous. I myself have always preferred Siegfried's story about Krimhild's revenge, the second installment, in terms of Lang and also in terms of Reinl. Lang's work here is still a silent film as usual and black-and-white of course, although you could also make a case for black and gold.

Lead actor Paul Richter will certainly be recognized by fans of German silent movies. And most of the other actors have played in many other films as well. But back to this one: It was the second or third time I watched it and it is still worth seeing. My favorite scene is definitely Siegfried's encounter with the dragon very early on. The dragon just looks superb and the falling-leaf scene is just too memorable. Unfortunately, the film is not packed with these extraordinary scenes from start to finish. Occasionally it drags, although it's almost an impossible achievement for a movie of 150 minutes to be edge-of-seat stuff from start to finish. This one does not succeed. However, it brings fairly decent entertainment value and a couple more scenes who are almost as memorable as the one with the dragon that I just mentioned. It is certainly not a film for everybody, but silent film lovers will probably have a good time with this one. Thumbs up.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
That poor dragon...
davidmvining19 August 2022
Fritz Lang dealt with Germany's present in Dr. Mabuse, and now he turns his eyes to its past, its myth, and its legends. It's also a rollicking good time of grand adventure, magic, and bravery. It's a triumph of physical production combined with a wonderfully engaging mythic quest to hang it all on. This is the sort of movie I eat up.

Siegfried (Paul Richter), a prince, has been training with a troll blacksmith in the deep forests of the land to learn the craft of sword making. When he completes a perfect weapon, he is told that there's nothing more he can learn. As he's preparing to leave, he hears the tale of the most beautiful maiden in the land named Kriemhild (Margarete Schon) in the kingdom of Worms. He becomes dedicated to finding her and winning her hand. The first stage of his journey brings him to a dragon. Now, there's something kind of odd about this opening adventure. I think it's largely a limitation of the large prop Lang had built for the film in that it can't move very much. It ends up looking really peaceful. And then Siegfried shows up and fights it. There's an odd emotional effect to that. It doesn't feel right. Still, Siegfried kills the dragon and then bathes in its blood to make him invincible save a single spot on his back that gets overed with a lime leave, akin to Achilles' heel.

He encounters a dwarf king that tries to kill him. When Siegfried triumphs, he receives a helmet that turns him invisible or into another form and the treasure of the Nibelungen. He becomes so powerful that he makes twelve kings his vassals, and then he arrives at the bridge leading into Worms, ready to marry Kriemhild. The natural curves and hills of the natural world give way to the exacting architecture of the palace at Worms where Kriemhild's brother Gunther (Theodor Loos), the king, is a weak ruler and his chief advisor Hagen of Tronje (Hans Adalbert Schlettow) tells him to use Siegfried to win the warrior princess Brunhild (Hanna Ralph) as Gunther's bride in exchange for allowing the marriage between his sister and the new arrival.

Gunther must defeat Brunhild in three physical contests (stone throw, long jump, and a spear fight) that Siegfried, using his invisible helmet, aids Gunther in winning. However, Brunhild knows that something is wrong, especially when she is back and Worms and the man who supposedly defeated her is much meeker than expected. Siegfried is even sent into their bedroom, disguised as Gunther, to break Brunhild's will on their wedding night, a moment where he accidentally takes one of her bracelets. Kriemhild finds the bracelet, and Siegfried must tell her the tale of what happened, promising her to keep the secret, a secret she can't keep once Brunhild openly insults her in public. The angry captive princess and new queen pits Gunther against his blood-brother Siegfried with the help of Hagen, and Hagen uses deception to convince Kriemhild to tell him the exact location of Siegfried's weak spot.

I'm so used to Hollywood formula that I didn't expect the ending that we got, which is probably accurate to the original German poem that the script was based on. It has a surprising amount of emotion to it as Kriemhild is faced with the consequences of her mistakes, the giving up of the two secrets to Brunhild and Hagen. Silent film scores tend to be little more than window dressing to the film, written quickly and with a lot of repetition to fill the sound space from beginning to end. There's a moment where Kriemhild is presented with a tragic moment, though, where the soundtrack by Gottfried Huppertz falls completely silent, allowing the tragedy to linger as the audience gets to feel the same thing that Kriemhild is feeling. It's a surprisingly affecting moment.

Siegfried represents the Germanic ideal of a man and Kriemhild represents the Germanic ideal of a woman. They are unquestionably the good people in this maze of deceit that he walks into and she has grown up within. That he does not understand the puzzle is tragic, but that she cannot save him is even worse.

The combination of grand adventure with a strong eye towards intimate character detail and movement is really what makes the whole thing work. It's classic formula that Hollywood was well on their own way to perfecting at the time as well. If this had been made in America, Douglas Fairbanks would have starred with Myrna Loy, and it would have fit in perfectly well with stuff like The Thief of Bagdad or The Three Musketeers.

It's just...that poor dragon. He just wanted a drink.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An excellent production
cicero995 October 2003
This film, and its companion, are a remarkable achievement that captures the story of "Das Nibelungenlied." It combines elements from additional sagas that are not part of the source text to fill in some of the history of Sigfried. For me, it does capture the essence of the saga.

The film is a masterful accomplishment for its time with Fritz Lang's trademark vision and a great script by Thea von Harbou.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed