Why Change Your Wife? (1920) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
26 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Never underestimate the power of a dress
pocca6 January 2006
Today Cecil B. DeMille is probably best known for the overwrought (if thoroughly enjoyable) biblical epic "The Ten Commandments." But during the silent era he made several sophisticated comedies portraying the battle of the sexes such as "Why Change Your Wife," an engaging mixture of bizarre, over the top glamour (the negligee the husband buys his wife is so elaborately constructed I couldn't blame her for looking dismayed when she first saw it) and dead on day-to-day detail about married life—is there a couple who hasn't gotten in each other's way and on each other's nerves when sharing a bathroom? Gloria Swanson plays Beth Gordon, a young wife who cannot resist the temptation to improve her husband, scorning his fox trot records for something called "The Dying Poet." She loses him to the proverbial shop girl, Sally Clark—hilariously played by Bebe Daniels—a character so vulgar she owns a gyrating Kewpie Doll. (This film's frank endorsement of consumerism has often been remarked on, but it rightly acknowledges that what we chose to buy tells as much about our class and character as anything else). The husband soon realizes that he made a mistake, clearly finding Sally's baby talk even more tiresome than Beth's high minded nagging, but it isn't until Beth transforms herself into a sexy knockout wearing the height of pre-flapper fashion that the two reunite.

The movie isn't entirely cynical about romance—it is never really in doubt that Beth and her husband love each other—but it is shrewd enough to recognize that in holding the attention of your partner a little glamour and sophistication doesn't hurt (the husband isn't let off the hook though, and his naiveté in expecting the honeymoon phase to last forever is mocked in a bathroom scene when Sally repeatedly interrupts his attempts to shave just as Beth did earlier).

A side note: All the leading players are engaging, but the violinist (played by Theodore Kosloff) who seduces women by making love to their souls steals every scene he is in.

To sum up, this worldly comedy challenges the common assumption that silent film is little more than slapstick or melodrama.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Silent DeMille - Gloria Swanson vs Bebe Daniels
jjcremin-110 July 2008
In 1920, Cecil B. DeMille was already the king of Paramount. Titles would show a DeMille coin and he was the producer and director in charge and already had spectacles under his belt. But he also made romantic comedies that very much are a product of their times. His most famous female star of the late teens to early twenties was Gloria Swanson, who would go on to be a major silent star in her own right during the era.

Thomas Meighan is not so well remembered today except for hard core silent buffs. Few of his films are rarely revived and he died in 1936 after a two year bout with cancer. Another major silent star who did have some successes in sound was Bebe Daniels, probably most famous for singing "You're Getting To Be A Habit With Me" and breaking her leg in 42ND STREET.

Meighan and Swanson co-starred together in DeMille's MAN AND FEMALE a year previous to this one. Here, they are introduced as husband and wife in a script written by William DeMille, Cecil's brother. While Thomas shaves, Gloria pesters him into buttoning the back of her dress. It's a humorous modern day problem and both leads are funny as they frustrate each other.

She won't even let him listen to HINDISTAN - A FOX TROT on a vintage 78 and forces him to listen to A DYING POET instead. By the way, Hindistan is another name for India. There is throughout a condescending tone to non-whites. but it's not as bad as some other films. In fact, DeMille would be guilty of that throughout his career but I do bear in mind he wasn't alone and many were worse. More fun to watch, though, is what passed for high fashion in 1920. I don't think anyone would be caught dead today wearing what passed for bathing suits back then.

It is at the store where Meighan meets Daniels who gets to play a total vamp, even comically putting a heart size mole on her arm. She literally seduces him on the spot. While they go out, poor Gloria has her violin recital playing A DYING POET without her husband. Later on, straight laced Gloria Swanson reads about their marriage following her divorce. Well, two can play this game. Gloria goes to the store herself and gets herself some outrageous clothes and has several admirers follow her to a rich resort that has a great swimming pool where guests can sit. Somehow, Meighan and Swanson get back together while Daniels gets the violin player.

I really doubt people really lived like this in 1920, but romantic escapist films are made today. A fun little picture.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Do women really have to sex it up to keep their man? Watch and see.
secondtake27 February 2010
Why Change Your Wife (1920)

This is a great romp, getting better with every scene. It is not good to women, though, making them out to be selfish and catty. It also makes it seem that a woman's role is to be beautiful for her man, and if she isn't, he practically has the right to leave her. I mean, come on now!

The leads (three of them) are all first rate. The man is a charmer, really convincing and natural, Thomas Meighan. His wife (at first) is Gloria Swanson, a silent screen staple (especially for director Cecil B. de Mille who directed six straight films with Swanson, including the parallel, Don't Change Your Husband (1919). But the third other woman is Swanson's match, Bebe Daniels, and if she isn't as famous, it's only because time is fickle.

Because the three are so well balanced, both in ability and in the way they are given time together (in all three possible combinations, plus all three of them together), the film really builds momentum well. The modernity of flipping wives was probably part of the racy appeal, and it might seem a little staid by our standards, where there is (sometimes) less gravity to a marriage.

Music is key, which might seem odd for a silent film, but by showing us the 78 records being put on, the audience knows what the soundtrack would be. (The actually sound tacked on to my DVD version of this film is a brutal melange of found orchestral pieces that cut in and out, hither and tither.) For those interested in the actual piece called Hindustan that is key in three scenes (and key to the changing sentiments of the women) go to www.archive.org/details/JosephC.SmithsOrchestra-01-07 and you can actually click on piece to hear it (a lively pre-jazz dance type number).

So is this a pertinent film? In a way, it is. It's basic theme of paying attention to what your mate needs, and appreciating their attentions, is pretty timeless. But in other ways the film is sadly, painfully retrograde, and it isn't just because it's 1920. The way the women vie for the man, and the way he lets them, and ultimately the way he treats the Daniels character (who does him no wrong any more than the Swanson one does), is just cheap and tossed around for comedic purposes. Which is how you can take it and enjoy it. More than you'd expect.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gloria Swanson Wins Her Man!
drednm2 January 2006
Why Change Your Wife was part of Cecil B. DeMille's "marriage trilogy" and is a sly and well-acted 1920 silent film that stars Gloria Swanson as a dowdy and prissy wife whose husband (Thomas Meighan) is bored with. He wants fun and romance! So he trots off to a dressmaker to buy her a negligee to spice up the marriage. But an ambitious model (Bebe Daniels) recognizes him as her mother's old boss and sets out to trap him. Of course he is putty in her hands and she causes a divorce.

After the divorce Swanson overhears two women gossiping about her in the next changing room. She decides to "jazz up her lingerie" and win the husband back. Of course they all end up at the same Atlantic City hotel where the transformed Swanson (what a bathing suit!) catches his eye anew. Through a series of plot twists, including the manic cat fight between the two women with threats of throwing acid, poor Bebe concedes defeat and (after emptying his wallet of cash) leaves him to Swanson.

Good fun and all 3 stars are terrific. Also taking center stage are the women's fashions (hilariously "exotic") and the interior decor. DeMille was the first director to understand the importance of film as a TREND SETTER and basically created the product endorsement mania so prevalent in today's films.

Sylvia Ashton is Aunt Kate, Theodore Kosloff is the violinist, Lucien Littlefeld is the butler, and William Boyd is one of the hotel guests. The hotel is quite a spot, and mention should be made of the cat and dog fight which presages the battle between Swanson and Daniels. The dog is funny, and the cat is named Toodles, which was the name of the home wrecker played by Julia Faye in the preceding "marriage" film: Don't Change Your Husband.
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The clothes make the woman
MissSimonetta1 December 2021
This silly romantic comedy is a premium example of what I call "lifestyle porn." There is a plot to be sure and allegedly a lesson about keeping playfulness within a marriage, but the main focus is on the mansions and the clothes. It isn't for naught that Gloria Swanson was often accused of being a clothes horse in her movies despite boasting fine acting chops. This isn't one of her more interesting roles and DeMille's other society comedies like THE AFFAIRS OF ANATOL or FORBIDDEN FRUIT are far more engaging, but WHY CHANGE YOUR WIFE? Is still a fun trifle.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Torn Between Two Lovers!
bsmith55528 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"Why Change Your Wife?' is another of those comedy/satires on married life from Producer/Director Cecil B. De Mille.

Robert (Thomas Meighan) and Beth (Gloria Swanson) are a fairly well off married couple who have begun to grow apart. Beth has become a be-speckled intellectual with little in common with her husband. She prefers classical music to his fox trots and shuns his advances.

In an effort to spice things up, Robert goes to "Le Maison Chic" a dress shop to purchase a negligee for Beth in the hope that it will stir things up. Unbeknownst to Robert, he is being eyed by one of the store's models, Sally Clark (Bebe Daniels) who sets her sights on him.

When Beth spurns Robert's present he becomes depressed. As luck would have it, Sally comes to his office with a missing article from his previous days' purchase, just as he is being turned down by Beth for a night on the town. She wants to stay home and listen to high brow violinist Radinoff (Theodore Kosloff) who has more than a passing interest in her.

Robert takes Sally out instead and finds out that they have much in common. One thing leads to another and Beth and Robert are divorced and Robert marries Sally. After a few months, Robert learns that Sally is not all that he thought her to be and again feels trapped in a loveless marriage.

Beth meanwhile starts to realize that she has let herself go over the years and decides to get a complete make over. Robert and Sally and Beth and her Aunt Kate (Sylvia Ashton) all turn up at the same vacation spot. When Robert sees the "new" Beth he falls in love with her all over again. Sally meanwhile, has taken up with Radinoff.

One day while walking with Beth, Robert slips on a banana peel and sustains a head injury. Beth takes him to her home to recover. Sally finds out and....................................................

This film is pleasant enough but one gets a feeling of deja vu as De Mille had released several similarly themed films in the last little while. The performances are good. Meighan has the boyish good looks and vulnerability that would be characteristic of Gary Cooper years later. Swanson in glasses, is a sight but she really shines after her "transformation". The equally lovely Bebe Daniiels had worked in Harold Lloyd comedies in the teens and was now breaking out into features.

You've just got to see the 1920 style bathing suits which were considered daring for their day in the vacation resort sequence. My how times have changed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bittersweet romantic comedy-drama from DeMille
overseer-327 January 2004
Although the plot is not as absorbing as in his classics "The Affairs of Anatol" or "Male and Female" Cecil B. DeMille makes this romantic piece of fluff intoxicating still, especially if you enjoyed the romantic and sexual tension between Gloria Swanson and Thomas Meighan in the latter film. "Why Change Your Wife?" was made a year after "Male and Female" and the audience gets to see the two as a married pair: in the first scenes Tommy is shaving and Gloria is getting dressed. The interplay between them is fabulous and funny. She is always interrupting him in front of the bathroom mirror and he can't quite manage to button the back of her dress. So typical and true to life. She lectures him on his personal tastes: "must you have a dog?" and "you should listen to classical music and not tin pan alley" and "you should stop drinking/smoking..." The film shows the affects of nagging upon a marriage, and boy is THAT true to life!

Enter Bebe Daniels. She likes men with curly hair and Tommy Meighan fits the bill. She manages to attract Tommy away from Gloria; even though we know Tommy still loves Gloria, she still needs to be taught a lesson on men and marriage. She learns her lessons the hard way, but therein lies the fun for the audience. The moral of the story here is that wives should remember they are their husbands' sweethearts first, their wives second, and that they should not forget the romance that keeps a couple together and out of the divorce courts.

I don't want to give away more of the plot but see this film. If you are a woman watch it with your husband. You won't regret it.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Why Change Your Wife?
kaylkayxo26 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Why Change Your Wife(1920) was a great film. This is my second time viewing a silent film. It is still very interesting to my how well you can follow the story line without actual dialog. Why Change Your Wife although a very dated film had themes that will never get old. To this day movies come out with similar themes of relationship struggles,scandalous affairs that lead to new relationships. These two things are very entertaining and dramatic, something a lot of Americans enjoy in entertainment. It is funny to me that even back then, men were tempted by other woman. Beth's attitude at first was very close-minded. Her relationship with her husband was very distant. It was no surprise to me that her husband had left. Her character nagged over everything her husband did. To this day people are changing themselves for the others. In the end I thought that Beth was a much better match than Sally. Betty just had to loosen up a bit. As far as filming goes, I thought it was advanced for it's time. When Betty is acting uncomfortable and hiding in her negligee Robert imagines Sally, who's image appears in shadow. Also two different scenes are going on at once. While Betty is at home and Robert is at work for example, the film goes back and forth between screens. Quality of the film back them was obviously poorer considering now a days everything is hi-definition. That was expected. Over all I really enjoyed this film and was satisfied with it's ending.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great Silent Classic!
bebegirl354 June 2000
I bought this film because Bebe Daniels is in it. I may be a little biased since Bebe was my grandfather's aunt, but I think the movie is terrific. The story is so true to life even today! It has a great message and the written narration is so "deep" for the lack of a better word. I was actually more impressed with Gloria Swanson in this particular film though! She was great! She actually "made" the movie! Bebe's part as a vamp was really good too though! She was the perfect one to play this part! I am not gonna give anything away, just order it and watch it for yourself! My husband and I enjoyed it so much! I must confess I ordered all the Bebe movies I could find because there is a definate family resemblance between she and I! But out of my strange interest in this aspect, I actually ended up finding so much more! I love the Silent Classics and discovered Gloria Swanson in the process! Thank you and take care!!!
14 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a typical example of DeMille's comedy
facd2009 March 2000
Swanson changes her style dramatically in the middle of the film (after the divorce), and she becomes really gorgeous. It seems like this film was made just to show her. Comparing with her, Daniels (and other characters) is not so impressive. The film itself has a simple story and maybe it is not so appealing to everyone but still interesting to see.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"I do love you dear, but right now I'm shaving"
Steffi_P8 October 2008
Why Change Your Wife? is something of a sequel to DeMille's first collaboration with Gloria Swanson, Don't Change Your Husband. As the title suggests however, the roles are now reversed and this time it is Swanson who is rejected by her husband, and must get it together to win him back.

Of course, this being your typical, clichéd battle-of-the-sexes flick, second-rate wives are an entirely different kettle of fish to second-rate husbands. So whereas Elliot Dexter in Don't Change Your Husband had to transform himself from slob into sophisticate, Gloria Swanson's journey is from dowdy frump to sexy siren. It's here that the problems with Why Change Your Wife? begin. It's not that Swanson can't pull off the goody-goody image – she can, even though it's against her usual type. DeMille in fact insults her acting ability by grossly simplifying her character, even giving her glasses - which of course disappear (along with any apparent sight difficulties) after her makeover. And Thomas Meighan, so perfectly cast as Creighton in the previous year's Male and Female, here seems rather bland, so much so that it seems odd that Swanson would want him back. Compare this to Don't Change Your Husband, where we applauded Swanson for dumping her oafish husband, then sympathised with her when her second marriage didn't turn out as planned, finally to route for Elliot Dexter once he had smartened himself up. You don't get any of this in Why Change Your Wife? because the characters are so shallow.

Changes were taking place in the old DeMille style too. Although one or two scenes – notably the opening sequence in the bathroom – are played out with no intertitles, allowing the acting to convey everything, too much of the picture … is annoyingly broken up … with pointless bits of dialogue. It's a shame because DeMille still proves himself able to tell the story visually. In particular his use of point-of-view shots had increased over his last few pictures, and they are particularly apt in these marriage-gone-wrong melodramas which are after all about little more than people ogling or sneering at each other. DeMille's eye for vivid presentation is still top-notch too – for example look at the way he neatly frames Swanson in a symmetrical composition when she begins trying on those "strapless, backless, indecent" dresses.

DeMille's screenwriter/mistress Jeanie Macpherson as usual provides the wordiness, and as those familiar with their silent works will know she had a rather unique style, blending poetic rhythm with a somewhat bizarre take on reality. Why Change Your Wife? features some of the best (or worst) examples of her oddness, at one point beginning a title with "If this were fiction…" My favourite Macpherson-ism of the lot though is the final line of that same title: "It's generally a brick or a banana peel that changes a man's destiny." Classic.

A final fault with Why Change Your Wife? is that it takes itself too seriously. Don't Change Your Husband had a comedy edge which balanced out its dramatic side, and also made the clichés more palatable. The later picture though presents itself more or less as a straight drama, but the storyline and characters are too flimsy to carry it off.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Rather charming--and a nice object lesson
planktonrules7 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Cecil B. DeMille directed this film--and it seems to bear very little similarity with his big-budget epics that made him famous. Unlike these 'big' films, this one is simple and focuses on people. Mr. Gordon (Thomas Meighan) loves his wife (Gloria Swanson) but he's very frustrated. She treats him more like her child than a husband--always telling him what to do and how to act. When he tries to get her to change and be more a lover than a mother, she rebuffs his advances and is frigid. Eventually, he tires of this and is tempted by a home-wrecker (Bebe Daniels). But, his conscience stops him from going too far and returns home to the wife. However, instead of giving him what he needs, the wife belittles him and demands a divorce when he tells her that he kissed Daniels.

Time has passed. The Gordons are now divorced and Daniels is now the new Mrs. Gordon. In a strange twist, now Daniels is bossy and non-sexual and the newly divorced Swanson realizes that she must work in order to attract and keep a man--and she becomes a bit of a vamp.

Where this all leads is something you should see for yourself--it's entertaining and quite charming. I liked the characters and story as well as the important object lessons to husbands and wives. Wives should not be afraid to be sexy and must not take their men for granted. And, husbands should not necessarily expect things to be much different if they changes wives. In both cases, it's what you put into a marriage that is important. Compared to other full-length films of the day, this one is well above average--with a love of clever writing and acting...plus DeMille shows he could expertly direct a film about people. Sure, the plot is a bit contrived--but entertaining and worth seeing--especially if you are a big fan of silents.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Old chairs can be mighty comfortable
bkoganbing24 March 2014
Long before Norma Shearer slapped on those claws that she had two years to grow in The Woman, Gloria Swanson was waging just such a campaign to win back her husband who might have been as stuffy as an old chair, but those things are mighty comfortable and you miss them when they're not around. Where Gloria was doing this was in the Cecil B. DeMille comedy Why Change Your Wife.

Thomas Meighan is the husband doing the changing. He and Swanson irritate each other right down to the family dog which Swanson insists stay outside because of what he does to the furniture. It's no wonder that Meighan falls for the charms of one of those new fangled flapper type girls in Bebe Daniels.

While all this is going on planning his next recital on the Rebound Concerto is Theodore Kosloff who fiddles with wives as much as he fiddles with his fiddle. He sees an opening with Swanson and he's moving in like a jungle cat.

Say Cecil B. DeMille people think massive spectacles with casts of thousands. He did those in the silent days, but he also went in for spirited comedies like Why Change Your Wife and Gloria Swanson was one of his favorite stars. In fact all the players here were used multiple times by DeMille.

Shades of Destry Rides Again, there's one beautiful chick fight toward the end with Gloria and Bebe while an unconscious Meighan is in dream land.

I'd see this one for a glimpse at another aspect of Cecil B. DeMille.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lusting in His Heart
wes-connors30 September 2007
Thomas Meighan (as Robert Gordon) is a is a typical husband, with the matrimonial faults most wives will find in/tolerable; he smokes too much and likes the "Fox Trot". Gloria Swanson (as Beth Gordon) is his virtuous, but bored, wife; she is likes to sew and is concerned for the "starving millions in Europe." Bebe Daniels (as Sally Clark) is an attractive young widow who models for the "Mansion Chic"; she will rock the Gordon marriage!

The cat (as Toodles) and Theodore Kosloff (as the violinist) are fun to watch. Also fun is Ms. Daniels making herself attractive to her old acquaintance (of her father) by putting a heart decal on her shoulder; her pursuit of wavy-haired men is boldly interesting. Ms. Swanson dolling herself up to win back her man, and the women cat fighting, are amusing scenes. You have to sympathize with Mr. Meighan, aghast at the ludicrous fashions on display in this movie; the women's lingerie and bathing suits are freakishly unbelievable! There is nothing terribly outstanding about "Why Change Your Wife", when compared with other DeMille fare from the time period. As a DeMille production, it rises above mediocrity, of course; it was inevitable that more domestic gripes would be filmed, as the box office demanded.

***** Why Change Your Wife (5/21/20) Cecil B. DeMille ~ Thomas Meighan, Gloria Swanson, Bebe Daniels
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Don't Change Your Screenplay
HarlowMGM25 January 2012
Director Cecil B. De Mille and actress Gloria Swanson had a monster hit in 1919 with the slightly comic melodrama DON'T CHANGE YOUR HUSBAND about a tired husband who neglects his wife. The next year De Mille and Swanson were reunited for this film, WHY CHANGE YOUR WIFE, which is virtually a remake of the earlier film, only this time the wife is neglectful spouse. This movie is actually a far superior film to the original however because it's played almost entirely for laughs here and Thomas Meighan is a far better actor and more appealing romantic lead than Elliot Dexter in the first film.

Young matron Gloria Swanson is barely 20 but she might as well be 50 the way she dresses and with that nagging, sour attitude of hers. She whines when her husband's dog is indoors, complains about his choice in music, and basically has turned into a fussy aunt. Husband Meighan's attempts at affection are rebuffed and in desperation he decides to buy a sexy gown for her, falling into the lair of vampy clothes model BeBe Daniels. BeBe manages to break up their marriage before Gloria can blink those legendary blue eyes and Meighan scarcely has a moment to breathe before he finds himself in yet another marriage and this one more troublesome than the first.

The cast is terrific here; beautiful, chic Gloria is remarkably believable as the young woman who has gotten old before her time. Thomas Meighan is excellent as the husband who goes from being one wives' puppet to a similar role with the second missus. Silent movie fans who are more familiar with the later silent career of Meighan (actually less than a decade away) when he was a more austere screen presence may be surprised how dashing he was at this point in his career and very much a matinée idol. BeBe Daniels is absolutely delicious as the tramp who ultimately decides "the best thing about marriage is alimony". This delightful romantic comedy stills packs quite a punch after some 90 years.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
why change your wife
americanjedi81826 January 2011
this movie definitely was different from the silent films i have seen before. I definitely was able to pick up more on what was going on there wasn't to much mystery in the movie. the thing that shocked me was about the whole idea of divorce happening in the 1920's you didn't here of that going on to much. Robert the male lead in this movie i found to be pretty funny. He would try to have his wife try on clothes she didn't like and listen to music she didn't like. He would be all into it. she would act like he needed to grow up.She thought he was cheating on her with another girl and divorces him. then him and the new girl get married and they are acting the same way from his first message. i thought the repetitive acts torturing robert was quiet funny it wasn't until the original two get there act together and realize that your sweat heart is gonna have to do things to make the other happy
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Why Change Your Wife? review
JoeytheBrit29 June 2020
Poor Thomas Meighan finds it impossible to have an uninterrupted shave whether he's married to an old-before-her-time Gloria Swanson or a fun but needy girl like Bebe Daniels in this self-consciously sophisticated comedy from Cecil B. DeMille. Swanson's beauty is too aggressive to be contained by the frumpy image she's aiming for, but she makes a game effort before finally transforming into a vampish sex siren following her divorce from Meighan. Her co-star is also likeable as the chump who realises almost too late that there's a reason why the grass always looks greener on the other side of the fence. Only Daniels is short-changed in the part of a blameless character who turns a little too nasty in the final reel.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
another side of Swanson
kidboots3 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
If you only know of Gloria Swanson from "Sunset Boulevard" (as I did) you are in for a big surprise. This film was one in a series of sophisticated comedies that Cecil B. DeMille directed with Gloria Swanson as the star.

Robert (Thomas Meighan) and Elizabeth (Swanson) are in a rut. Beth has turned into a nagging shrew - criticising his love of his dog, his taste in music and his choice of "inappropriate" gifts for her. Robert is sick of being constantly improved and reproved and after a chance encounter at a dress shop with Sally (Bebe Daniels), a child- hood friend, he quarrels with Beth and together he and his trusty dog leave home.

He marries Sally and once again learns that "wives will be wives". After the divorce Beth over-hears a conversation in which she is the object of pity. She decides to ditch her modest ways - "I want it sleeveless, backless, transparent, indecent - go the limit" she tells the dressmaker. The flowery, often witty titles were fun to read. Robert and Sally have a weekend away at Atlantic Beach and (unbeknownst to them) stay at the same resort as Beth, who is trying out her new look. The resort is very grand and the pool, along with the women in their very daring bathing suits, must have been the last word in decadence. (I thought it was interesting how women put the perfume on their lips!!!!)

It takes a slip on a banana skin to bring him to his senses (sort of). There is a hilarious cat fight between Beth and Sally as Robert lies hovering between life and death. Also a fight between Toodles (Sally's cat) and Robert's dog - dog being the male finds himself in the dog house yet again.

The very handsome William Boyd has a "blink and you'll miss him" part as a naval officer at the resort dancing attendance on Julia Faye, in a very exotic bathing suit. She would have been far better as the "other woman" than Bebe Daniels. I love Bebe Daniels but she didn't stand out for me, was not "vampy" enough.

Costume design was by Natasha Rambova - the woman who almost bought Rudolph Valentino's career to a stand still.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A film carried by exaggerated emotions
tinyredspoons14 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Why Change Your Wife (1920) is a fairly lighthearted and rather sexist romp through matrimony. Because it is a silent movie, a great bit of the narration relies upon exaggerated facial and body expressions to move the story along. The lack of dialogue between the characters only makes their interactions all the more hilarious. The husband Richard seems all the creepier when faced with infidelity because he spends so much time eyeing the ladies in question as though they were food, and his obvious annoyance at the most trivial household matters makes him seem all the more of a jackass. On the other hand, his wife's constant grimace and the constant "tizzies" she flies into paint her as one obnoxious spouse. The movie is lighthearted, and for the time it was probably appropriate; judging by the "words of advice" at the end that remind those of the female persuasion to stop nagging their "overworked" husbands.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Musical Taste Plays Huge Role In This Silent Movie
springfieldrental8 October 2021
Today's movie fans think it's inconceivable music could possibly play an important role in silent movies--beside an organ or piano accompanying the film in a theater setting. Paradoxically, music did prove to be a crucial element in a few silent movies. How can that be, one asks? A prime example is in Cecil B. DeMille's April 1920 comedy "Why Change your Wife?" Music, or the choice of musical selections favored by the film's characters, illustrates their identities, personalities and desires within the plot.

Case in point: Gloria Swanson stars as a prim, almost frumpy wife of her normal husband, played by Thomas Meighan. While he enjoys contemporary popular music, she tries to educate him to the more cerebral classics such as 'The Dying Poet' by Louis Gottschalk. He looks for spice in his marriage by going to a lingerie shop to buy her some sheer outfits. She's none too pleased. When an innocent evening out with Bebe Daniels, whom he met in the lingerie store, makes Swanson flip out by the smell of perfume all over his clothes, she files for divorce. Meanwhile, Meighan thinks she's having an affair with an European classical violin player--another musical element.

In short, the taste in music reflects a wide gap between the two in their relationship. When Swanson realizes maybe she's too conservative while the husband marries Bebe, a series of coincidental meetings between the former married couple (he slips on a banana peel and hits his head on the pavement while walking with Gloria) lands Meighan in the hospital. A fierce fight erupts between Gloria and Bebe, which, according to one DeMille biographer, was based on a real life argument between two of the director's mistresses. In the movie, a vial of what Bebe thinks is acid is thrown in the face of Gloria, but in the actual DeMille cat fight, a bottle of ink was splayed over one participant.

Music once again comes into play towards the end to reflect Gloria's taste in compositions has changed, a huge pivot point in the movie's narrative.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another lesson in morales from Cecil B.
binapiraeus5 February 2014
Robert is slowly getting bored by his wife Beth, her old-fashioned clothes and her old-fashioned music tastes, and her constant carping at his manners. He makes one last try to change her again into a desirable female being by buying her a pretty daring negligee - but she decides that it doesn't suit her. The next day, when she wants to listen to a classic concert again instead of going to the Follies with him, he just goes out on his own - and 'falls prey' to young Sally, who'd been interested in him for quite a while. They spend the night together; but in the morning, the 'good husband' feels remorse, goes back to his wife and promises never to leave her alone again - but too late: she smells another woman's perfume, and throws him out of the house...

So, they get divorced, and Robert marries Sally - BUT as the inter-title warns us: 'wives will be wives'... So, after a while, Robert gets tired of Sally too - and meets Beth again on a holiday, who in the meanwhile has changed completely: she wears the most extravagant dresses, enjoys herself, has got a lot of admirers... But secretly, she's still in love with HIM - but alas, this time it's Robert who must give her a moral lesson: as she herself had taught him, a man can only be faithful to one woman at a time. Now, in which way will fate intervene this time??

Well - another of Cecil B. De Mille's lessons in morales and decency and destiny: don't break out of your social 'caste' ("Male and Female"), don't change your husband, don't change your wife... OK, all this was around 1920 - but that was JUST the year in which the two greatest Hollywood stars of the time showed to the public that it IS possible - and in no way immoral - to break out of an unhappy marriage to be free to marry and to be happy with the one you love: Douglas Fairbanks and Mary Pickford... So, even for early 20s' standards (and even WITHOUT any Production Code then), Mr. De Mille's ideas were a little bit outdated - although they still were an enormous box-office success; probably most of all due to the great performances of Thomas Meighan, Gloria Swanson and Bebe Daniels.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Why Change Your Formula?
Cineanalyst21 September 2006
This is Cecil B. DeMille's third picture on extramarital relationships, following "Old Wives for New" and "Don't Change Your Husband". I haven't seen the first one yet, but "Why Change Your Wife?" is just like "Don't Change Your Husband", except the roles of wife and husband are somewhat reversed. So, if you like this film or that one, I recommend you watch the other. On the other hand, it's too formulaic, predictable and cheap for me. The light humor is enjoyable, including the witty intertitles, but otherwise it's too fluffy and superficial, just as with "Don't Change Your Husband" and many other DeMille flicks.

An exception to the light mood is the excessive climax. Additionally, Thomas Meighan was lacking as an actor; for instance, in the opening bathroom scene, he glances towards the camera or director. It's too quick to be breaking the fourth wall, so for whatever reason that's in the film, it's a poor reflection upon Meighan and DeMille. As well, Sylvia Ashton plays the wise observer to the play, as she did in "Don't Change Your Husband"--she's our surrogate. And, once again, DeMille expresses his fetish for exotic clothing and lush interiors. For a while, DeMille might have became a good filmmaker (e.g. see "The Cheat" (1915)); he made this picture after that.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Plot is like those of Modern Day Romance Drama's
chiquensleek12 September 2011
Today, many modern day romance drama's are about an average girl who likes a guy, but isn't enough for him. In this movie, Beth, is a very conservative wife to her husband Robert, but she is very controlling about what he does. Instead of balancing their lives together, she has taken total control over his life, making him unhappy. Every time he tries to let her relax and loosen up, does she make a big fuss about how he doesn't like who she is. Then, he meets with an old friend again and they instantly connect and their sparks are flying just like they would in a modern day movie. The music really helps to make the tone of each scene. When Beth decides to kind of "live on the wild side," it just gives the impression that many woman are more likely to change their appearance for a guys attention. But in all respects, not every woman is like that. Its mostly for the affect that writers put that scenario into their plots. All in all it was a decent movie, very dramatic for the 1920s. Slow start, but ended pretty well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why Change your Wife
firstchance14 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
When first watching Why Change your Wife, I really didn't know what to expect. I don't have much experience with silent films and film critiques in general.

After watching the silent film I can honestly say I enjoyed the film, although I did find it a bit slow in some parts. At first I figured it was a married couple with some general problems and they end up getting divorced. The husband (Robert) would find someone new he fell in love with and would get away from his controlling and conservative wife (Beth). I would say I wrong in my assumption… although they did get divorced and he did find someone new. I was not expecting the twist in the middle. I really enjoyed scene where they met again at the hotel. When Robert is walking the dog and he's trying to get a look at the beautiful woman sitting (Beth). I love how he's trying to look and she puts her umbrella in the way and continues to move in a circle with Robert. The other scene I really enjoyed was when Beth was taking care of Robert after he slipped on a banana peel. Even though there were no words during the new Mrs. Gordon and Beth I found myself zoned in on the quarrel between the two. I found it amusing in some ways especially when she finds out it was just eye wash and proceeds to take Roberts money.

I did find some of the dialogs to be a bit lengthy. I understood some of the quotes, but I didn't always like how long or some of the messages being said. Over all I'd say Why Change your Wife was funny and entertaining movie!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Absence certainly makes the heart grow fonder, but its much safer
Sarahbeth21413 September 2011
Why Change Your Wife? was a movie about a couple undergoing some problems. Robert keeps trying to please his nagging wife, Beth. He tries to please her without success. He tries several things to please her and she continuously turns it down, refusing to change for him. This leads Robert to go out with another women who works in a negligee shop. Eventually she gets a little saucy to spruce herself up and become more appealing in hopes to win Robert back. I loved the romantic drama and the passion behind this silent film. Though it would have been better with sound, I found it very similar to some of the popular movies out today. It was refreshing to see the humor and romantic scandals that were around back in 1920 and how they haven't differed much from the scandals of today. It was a delight to watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed