The Toll Gate (1920) Poster

(1920)

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
The Good and the Bad
Cineanalyst13 July 2005
Although not his best (see "Hell's Hinges", "The Narrow Trail" or "Wagon Tracks"), this is a fine example of a William S. Hart Western. He plays his patented role of the good bad-man, whose regeneration is progressed by the love of a pure woman. Here, it seems more of a personal battle of conscience, and there's the revenge plot.

The plot of "The Toll Gate" is not as tight as in other Hart vehicles, and, this one is excessively melodramatic. There's also some mild racism; moral goodness is equated to being white (as in Caucasian). On the other hand, there's nighttime photography and some nice use of tinting. The wear of age aggrandizes the odd, striking look of some of these scenes, such as with the glowing, red tinted silhouettes, or the blue sky from color deterioration in the final reel. The print, however, is in bad shape during the dénouement.

Hart's face was very expressive, and nowhere is that more visible than here. The refinements in film-making by 1920 help that and reflect the superior gloss and look of films at this time. Still, Hart's Westerns seemed outdated by then--not as entertaining and well constructed as just a few years ago.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What an odd ending!
planktonrules20 April 2013
"The Toll Gate" is a silent William S. Hart film and it's rather similar to several other Hart films I have seen. Unlike later cowboy heroes, Hart quite often seemed to play bad guys with some good in them. Perhaps it's just that these films are the ones that somehow survived or he played the parts a lot. All I know is that it's the 3rd or 4th film of his I saw where he played a bad guy...well, a sort of bad guy! The film begins with a western gang leader (Hart) announcing to his men that they should disband and go their separate ways, as they're bound to get caught thanks to all the attention they got through their banditry. However, one of the gang, Jordan, insists that they go on one final mission--and the rest of the gang agrees. So, Hart goes along--only to discover that Jordan set them up! He manages to escape--because the soldiers who caught him remembered his good deed when he saved the fort from attack some time ago.

Much of the rest of the film consists of Hart's character running from the law. Eventually, it leads to the home of a woman and her child--her no-good husband had abandoned them long ago. Again, Hart's character does good and so the woman agrees to hide him from the law. But, when Jordan and his new gang attack, it's up to Hart to help save the day.

Overall, this was a very good western and I was prepared to give it at least a 7. However, the ending was quite strange and anti-climactic. Decent acting, a good story and a print that varies considerably in quality. It's worth seeing but if you aren't familiar with Hart's film, perhaps you might want to see another one first--one with an ending that won't disappoint.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Entertaining silent oater
JohnSeal5 December 2001
William S. Hart was a huge star in the early days of cinema, and The Toll Gate was one of his self-produced, self-written starrers. He plays a bad guy with a heart of gold who stumbles across a widow and her young son as he is pursued by the sheriff's posse. Sure as shootin' he reforms! I would love to hear what 'Master Richard Headrick', who played the three year old child, has to say (if anything) about his role in this and a number of other 20s features. According to IMDB he's still alive--at least at the date of this writing!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silent bad-assery.
Samoan Bob29 March 2003
Anyone that thinks that Westerns didn't get tough and gritty until the 50s needs to see this excellent silent film starring William S. Hart (who also wrote the screenplay I believe). Hart plays an outlaw that goes gunning for revenge against the man who betrayed him, all the while trying to dodge local authorities. He comes across a single mother and her young son and wrestles with his conscience...something he thought he suppressed a long time ago. The plot is a direct precursor to the similarly-themed 'Shane' and 'Will Penny' and Hart is the forefather of the silent hard-ass (Clint Eastwood owes a lot to him). Beyond its historical value, this film is recommended just for being so damn good.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
White Men Can't Jump
wes-connors24 May 2008
In a western cave, white William S. Hart (as Black Deering), leader of the outlaw Raiders, feels the law crashing in on his gang's crime spree. Fellow bandit Joseph Singleton (as Tom Jordan) thinks Mr. Hart is chicken, and goads his rival and the gang into one more heist. Of course, as Hart feared, things go all wrong. Later, on the lam from both Jordan and the law, Hart hides out with lonely white Anna Q. Nilsson (as Mary Brown). Ms. Nilsson is living alone with son Richard Headrick (as "The Little Feller"), since the disappearance of her husband…

"The Toll Gate" delivers the expected Hart western elements; however, they do not coalesce. It's a little unpleasant to start off with Hart disarmed by his gang's "mutiny", but nice to see him tough it out. Watch for a pivotal scene wherein Hart opens Nilsson's Bible: in it, he reads the verse "By their fruits ye shall know them" and locates a photograph which reveals something important about the film. The "by their fruits" theme is completely illogical if you think about the photograph. Also, Hart's cabin revelation is rather foolishly timed; obviously, it should have been made some minutes later (relating it more to Singleton's threat).

****** The Toll Gate (4/15/20) Lambert Hillyer ~ William S. Hart, Anna Q. Nilsson, Joseph Singleton
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
solid, if somewhat moralistic Hart vehicle
OldAle18 April 2007
For the first half of this film I thought I was going to be more impressed than I was with TUMBLEWEEDS, the only previous Hart western I'd seen. The early scenes, showing his gang planning their last holdup, Black Deering's (Hart's) reservations about going through with it, and his betrayal by his most trusted lieutenant, were brilliantly done; the isolation that Hart feels as he is more or less forced back into crime, his desire for revenge on Jordan, the traitor become upstanding citizen in town -- all well-directed and even moving. Unfortunately, when Deering briefly takes up with a widow out on the edge of the border a simplistic Christian moralizing tone sets in: one passage from the Bible seems to set him off on a course of repentance and honesty. It's not completely unforeseen, as there are hints that Deering isn't quite as bad as he's portrayed by his ex-comrade and the law, but still the self-sacrifice and stoic acceptance of his fate in the last couple of reels seem a bit forced and unrealistic to me.

I watched the Kino VHS, probably at least 10 years old, with a bonus of the Mack Sennett "His Bitter Pill" at the end. There are definitely some problems with the print it was struck from...the fire scenes are nearly invisible and there is a lot of ghosting and edge distortion in the second half of the film, but it's certainly watchable. Recommended for Hart fans and silent film buffs, but forgettable on the whole.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Wonderful Silent Film Worth Seeing
gpachovsky3 October 2007
This has become one of my favorite movies and certainly one of the best westerns I have ever seen. Having a soft spot for the genre (westerns are, or were, since they are no longer made very often, morality plays that too often have been denigrated by critics with intellectual pretensions), I purchased the DVD, sight unseen, because I had read enough about William S. Hart's work (much of which he wrote and directed) to pique my interest and thought I should have at least one of his films in my video collection.

I must admit that I approached the actual viewing with some trepidation. My previous experiences with silent cinema "classics" had left me feeling let down. Chaney's The Phantom of the Opera, Griffith's Birth of a Nation and Fairbanks' The Mark of Zorro were fine, but not nearly as good as their reputations would lead one to expect. They were either too long, or too theatrical, or both.

The Toll Gate, however, emerged as a pleasant surprise.

It is a story told in a simple and straightforward manner. Black Deering (played by Hart), leader of a notoriously successful outlaw gang, thinks the time has come for group to disband, before its luck runs out. He is, however, opposed by his chief lieutenant, Jordan, who goads them all into one last holdup by promising great wealth but leads them into a trap in which he is complicit. Everyone is killed except Deering, who is taken prisoner. When his captors recognize him as the man who once saved a number of soldiers and settlers by warning an outpost of an impending Indian attack, they allow him to escape. Free, he tries to find honest work but is snubbed and ridiculed and ultimately must rob again to survive. Soon, he is pursued not only by the sheriff's posse but also by Jordan (now prospering from the reward money he has collected) and his henchmen. His flight leads him to a remote cabin inhabited by a single mother and her little son. After some initial misgivings, they take him into their hearts. Deering sees a chance for a new life but, with the posse and Jordan closing in, realizes that this may not be possible.

Hart was the first great western star and the first to inject realism into the genre. As one of the pioneers of movie-making, he created many of the characters and situations that have become cliché in westerns for more than ninety years. What keeps his movies interesting, however, was his ability to go beyond the cliché (perhaps his imitators did not go far enough) so that the material appears fresh and innovative, even now. Three such instances in The Toll Gate illustrate this:

1) In one scene, his character shoots into a crowd in an attempt to kill Jordan, and kills a bystander instead. A subsequent close-up shows that he is clearly frustrated. The frustration, however, comes not from the fact that he has gunned down a man who had hitherto caused him no harm but that he missed his intended target.

2) In another, as he flees from the posse, his "borrowed" horse steps into a gopher hole and breaks a leg. Hart pulls out his gun to put the animal out of its misery but, before pulling the trigger, gives his head a sad, loving pat, as if to say farewell to an old friend.

3) And finally, after he has strangled Jordan and thrown his body over a cliff, he returns to retrieve his guns and spots his adversary's pistol lying on the ground nearby. He steps forward and gives it a swift kick before mounting his horse. It is a simple gesture but it underscores the deep loathing he feels for the man who betrayed him and his comrades.

And I love the title, The Toll Gate. It is allegorical in its implication that a man cannot begin a new life until he has paid for the sins of his old one. Deering's payment comes in the form of sacrifice. Today's more sophisticated audiences may not buy into that sentiment entirely but it can still work on you if you let it.

Viewers who like their videos in pristine condition will undoubtedly object to the DVD's picture quality, especially the badly deteriorated final reel. I don't mind at all. That a copy of this 1920 movie even exists at all is a miracle since prints of so many other silent movies have been lost. If you bear that in mind and look upon the film as a piece of history, its visual flaws are not that difficult to accept.

William S. Hart was born in 1870 in New York but grew up in the Minnesota and Wisconsin where he learned to speak Sioux and Indian sign language. He counted Wyatt Earp and Bat Masterson among his friends and collected Remington paintings, so his knowledge of the West was first-hand. If his vision seems overly romanticized by today's standards, it is nevertheless rooted far closer to reality than the spaghetti westerns of the '60s and '70s and the revisionist works that followed. Both the star and his films are overdue for re-evaluation.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Reformed But Unafraid!!
kidboots28 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
By 1920 the pace was beginning to tell on William S. Hart. Gone were the free and easy but busy days when he had called the shots over his little western company. He was now over 50 and had just finished two strenuous speaking tours in between films. He had also become involved in a number of lawsuits, one involving Triangle films, another with Thomas H. Ince. In addition he was looking to settle down to marriage with dreams of a large and loving family but unfortunately that wasn't to be. He had already proposed to a number of actresses and Anna Q. Nilsson, his co-star in "The Toll Gate" was one of them but maybe because of his "Victorian" type of manner he was always disappointed.

"The Toll Gate" is an allegorical term for the barrier that keeps desperate outlaw Black Deering (Hart) from the natural joys of family life. The gang has never been captured all thanks to Deering and his many devious ploys including water trails and having their headquarters in a hard to reach cave. Deering wants to disband, he feels they should quit before they're caught but there is dissension in the ranks as Jordan, a shifty outsider wants them to pull one last job which will net them over $40,000. That's because he has betrayed them to the local sheriff and instead of a straightforward train robbery they ride into a blood bath. The captain recognises the captured Deering as the man who rode 80 miles to warn the fort of an approaching Indian attack and the guards, who remember what might have happened to their wives and children if not for Deering, help him escape!!

He finds himself in Rincon which just happens to be where Jordan has bought himself a saloon with his "blood money" and is the real villain of the town according to the sheriff, him and his band of Mexican riders. There is a blazing gun battle - Deering fires at Jordan but hits a townsman but in his effort to get to the border is waylaid when he saves a cute little tyke who has fallen in the river. The mother Mary returns the favour by helping him pose as her deserted husband, hopefully to send the police on a false trail but they are suspicious of the pair and settle around the homestead for the night.

The critics of the day were full of praise for the realism of Hart's depiction of the West. Hart had announced in another paper that it was the best western he had produced but "Wids" (Apr. 25, 1920) felt that statement was "a little strong". With "The Toll Gate" Hart turned more and more to domestic happiness and Richard Headrick, the cute little boy whose cries of "Daddie" were the catalyst for Hart's surrender, often featured in his films.

The climax comes when Deering, realising that the missing husband is really Jordan and again that Mary has never really known a good man, prepares to do the "white" thing (that phrase abounds in this movie) by giving himself up - a very unconventional ending and why Hart's westerns are so far above the average. There is also a chance to see Hart's legendary pony Fritz being put through his paces.

Highly Recommended.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dark and morally complicated western long before the days of Clint Eastwood
MissSimonetta27 May 2015
The idea that westerns were all sweetness and light until the 50s and 60s falls apart when you examine the work of William S. Hart in the 1910s and early 1920s. He aimed for a general realism in his films and often played antiheroes who weren't above thievery, murder, and even rape before they discovered redemption in the second or third act. Of course, these films are also old-fashioned in their sense of old-fashioned religiosity and (usually but not always) passive heroines, but their grittier nature does make them ripe for critical re-evaluation, at least in my opinion.

The Toll Gate (1920) is a fine film, an ideal entryway into Hart's oeuvre. While there's nothing earthshaking from a technical point of view, its morally conflicted protagonist, a bandit leader constantly struggling to abandon the vagabond's life only to be pulled back by economic necessity or the allure of vengeance upon the man who betrayed him to the law, makes the story fascinating. Hart can be wooden at times, but for the most part, he is a restrained but powerful actor. Equaling him is the leading lady Anna Q. Nilsson, who, though stuck in a rather passive role, puts a great deal of subtlety into her character.

Worthwhile viewing and deserves rediscovery.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Takes the revisionism out of revisionism (CONTAINS SPOILERS)
counterrevolutionary6 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
From a bare description of THE TOLL GATE's major plot elements, one might think it's a revisionist Western of the 60s or 70s.

* Our hero is a robber, killer, and arsonist;

* the love interest is a single mother whose shiftless husband abandoned her and their child;

* twice our criminal hero is "unofficially" released by authorities in return for some good deed, and this is presented as a praiseworthy act;

* the only acts which are presented as truly evil are the betrayal of one's family and the betrayal of a criminal associate;

* the hero tries to go straight, but turns back to a life of crime after he can't get a job;

* the hero is on the run from both a sheriff's posse and a criminal gang;

* the hero's final redemption is accomplished by strangling a man with his bare hands and tossing his body over a cliff;

* and the "good bad man" ends the film by sending the young mother and her child back to civilization and riding off alone into the Mexican desert, never (presumably) to pay for his life of crime.

Just goes to show you that there is nothing new under the sun.

Of course, THE TOLL GATE doesn't display quite the cynicism or moral nihilism of its successors: the hero's redemption is set up when he surrenders to the posse after reading a passage from the Bible. Can't quite imagine Clint Eastwood doing that.

THE TOLL GATE an excellent movie by any standard, and Hart was a very fine actor, not given to the broad histrionics often used to convey emotion in the days before sound.

9/10.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
William S. Hart's masterpiece!
JohnHowardReid3 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Now for a real western classic: The Toll Gate (1920).

You'll find The Toll Gate hailed in numerous books as a William S. Hart masterpiece (which it is).

While not a quarter as spectacular as Tumbleweeds, The Toll Gate is almost equally engrossing. Certainly Hart's performance in the well-rounded title role has even more depth and color.

The chief supporting roles are also played with such considerable skill by Anna Q. Nilsson, Joseph Singleton and Jack Richardson that it comes as a surprise to discover that a film of such subtlety and power was made as early as 1920.

Moody location photography aided by Lambert Hillyer's astute direction also impress.

(Available on a superb, tinted, Sunrise Silents DVD).
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Overall excellent and very enjoyable (but not without flaws)
I_Ailurophile12 December 2023
Techniques have improved, technology has advanced, and societal values and storytelling sensibilities have changed, but a good movie is a good movie no matter how old it may be. Silent westerns are no less worthy than their talkie brethren, and in some cases may arguably stand taller: the narrative tends to be a tad more streamlined, cutting out excess so that not one foot of precious film stock is wasted; for lack of safety protocols that would be developed in time, stunts may hit harder; any fracas of music and noise never enters the equation to distract from the substance of a feature. Something like 'The toll gate' may in turn come off as simplified and straightforward, but the fact is just that all unnecessary trimmings that we're accustomed to in the sound era have been excised. And that's fine by me, because for my money this 1920 flick comes across as stark and pure, and it's highly enjoyable exactly as it is.

One can't tread very far among silent westerns without encountering William S. Hart, and this marks one of several of his collaborations with filmmaker Lambert Hillyer. There's a rough, stony stoicism in the man's acting that belies superb nuance and range, recalling select other actors over the years like Gregory Peck or George C. Scott. That's to say nothing of the stunt work that Hart commonly performed himself, frequently alongside trusted "Wonder Horse" Fritz - a credit to the man, the animal, and the trainers. At the same time, Hillyer's direction tends ever toward charged action and emotion, or at least emphatic, grabbing scenes and drama, and the outcome is a feast for the eyes from one moment to the next. It's hard not to get swept up in the beautiful, rugged landscapes that serve as filming locations, or the action sequences, or even just the sight of several majestic equines riding side by side or the admirable, heartfelt acting of a swell cast. That Hart produced and starred, and co-wrote the screenplay here alongside director Hillyer, I think says so much about how committed the duo were to the integrity of their craft, and how much they loved making movies. As a viewer it's impossible not to feel that passion shine through.

By all means, Hart stands out most in these seventy-three minutes, but even in a smaller supporting part Anna Q. Nilsson gives an earnest, meaningful performance that leaves an impact; if their co-stars make less of a mark it's only because their roles are of a lesser stature. And in all other regards 'The toll gate' is splendidly well made, including the sets, costume design, and hair and makeup that we expect of westerns. Joseph H. August's cinematography is rock solid in helping to build each shot and scene, and I appreciate the careful use of tinting that literally and proverbially colors the developed film. Meanwhile, the story that Hillyer and Hart wrote really is terrific, compelling and absorbing - betrayal, revenge, heroism, villainy, and an outlaw with a troubled past and an honest heart. Some westerns in all the past one hundred years have been unable to conjure a saga as rich and engrossing as this, or to subsequently shape a full-length picture with as much care, skill, and intelligence. All told there may be fewer stunts and scenes of action here than we get in some other like fare, but those we do get are well worth it, and the storytelling is so excellent and carefully plotted that it's more than enough by itself to keep us invested.

I'd stop short of saying the title is an outright must-see, and it's not perfect. There are a couple instances where poor lighting, deterioration of the surviving print, and/or a mild lag in the narrative combine for a scene that comes off a tad confused, or at least lackluster. There's also a single ill-considered line (related by the intertitles) to come in the back end of the runtime that's quizzical on the face of it and comes off as pointlessly, casually racist - a sense that is confirmed with another line or two to follow in turn. I don't know what else may have been true of Hillyer, Hart, or others involved, but I do know that these inclusions were unnecessary, and senseless, and are not a good look. And even if we set these factors aside, this movie may not be the one to change the mind of anyone who has a hard time engaging with older cinema, least of all as there are fluctuations in the image quality in the last reel or two, reflecting the struggles to preserve a work of so many years ago. Add in some old-fashioned heavy-handedness as the intertitles try to achieve some profundity, and not everything about 'The toll gate' has aged well.

Yet for whatever criticisms one may level, and for any of those ways in which the whole may falter, by and large this remains a great, upstanding genre piece. The troubles it faces in various ways are surely less severe than those of some of its kin. I'm not washing over the feature's weaknesses, but rather, its strengths handily outweigh and outshine the indelicacies and marginal inelegance. The writing, direction, and acting are all fantastic, and the contributions of the crew behind the scenes not truly any less so. I can understand how it won't appeal to all comers, yet as far as I'm concerned if one has any interest in the silent era or in westerns at large then this is a marvelous early example that mostly holds up and is well worth exploring. Don't necessarily go out of your way for 'The toll gate,' but if you do have the chance to watch, at only seventy-three minutes it's a classic that deserves recognition.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Familiar Story But Still Very Effective
Michael_Elliott16 March 2011
Toll Gate, The (1920)

*** (out of 4)

Outlaw Black Deering (William S. Hart) wants to retire after his gang's latest robbery but they convince him to go after one more score. His partner ends up selling him out for the reward money and Deering swears vengeance no matter how long it takes. He manages to escape from the posse and ends up on a small farm where he saves the life of a young boy and becomes apart of his mother's life. Soon Deering wants to start life fresh with them but his past is close behind. If you've seen any of Hart's Westerns made before THE TOLL GATE then you're going to be thinking that this is a remake of about three dozen of them. In all seriousness, if you've seen one Hart picture then you basically get the same story one film to the next but it says a lot about the persona of Hart that he managed to make each film so fresh and exciting even when it offers up nothing new. At 70-minutes the film never gets boring as we're treated to some nice drama as well as a couple very good action scenes. The opening scenes of the men trying to rob the train were pretty exciting and the ending with Hart trying to track down the man who set him up also offers some nice tension. The majority of the film features the same old story of Hart being a very bad man who falls for a woman who then makes him want to change his ways. At least in this film his character goes through a transformation where the viewer can at least understand and see why he would want to change his ways. There are several cute scenes between the little boy and Hart that really make the film stand out. The boy never got to know his real father so he looks forward to having a new dad in his life and this here makes for some very good moments. Hart fits the role with ease as by this time he could do this type of role in his sleep. He's benefited from a very strong supporting cast including Anna Q. Nilsson as the mother and Richard Headrick as the kid. Tom Jordan does a very good job playing the snake who turns Hart in. The film also benefits from some authentic scenery that really helps build up an atmosphere of being in the Old West. While the story is something we've seen before, the film is a good example of how you can bring fresh life to an old tale and with Hart's performance you walk away satisfied.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed