The Soul of Youth (1920) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Knowing Love
kidboots9 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
William Desmond Taylor may be better known as the victim of one of Hollywood's most sensational unsolved crimes but in reality, like Marshall Neilan, he was a sensitive director who had an uncanny talent at drawing out the best from young performers. He had already kick started Jack Pickford's career with "Tom Sawyer" and "Tom and Huck" and was fatefully given "Anne of Green Gables" to direct for the young star Paramount thought would supersede Mary Pickford in popularity - Mary Miles Minter. Even though as a team they succeeded for a while Mary's stage mother stepped in and within a few years Minter was finished in films, thanks to the scandal of being associated with the unsolved murder of Taylor.

Lewis Sargent had already starred in Taylor's "Huckleberry Finn" and with a story adaptation by Julia Crawford Ivers, "The Soul of Youth" took them in a new direction with a hard hitting story that throws everything at the audience - from drug addiction to civic corruption!!

Poor Ed Simpson (Sargent) is up against it from the start - sold by his mother who is alone and knows she will soon die. His new mother wants the baby to force her boyfriend, racketeer Pete Morano, into marriage and also to give her a "steady supply"!! Ed soon finds himself the head boy at the orphanage where he is kicked and cuffed by the pickle faced matrons and is the butt of pranks and jokes by the other kids. When an elderly matron comes looking for a golden curled, dimpled orphan to adopt ("we don't usually get those type here"), the girl who accompanies her, Vera (lovely Lila Lee) gets Ed thinking about Love - he doesn't know what the word means. He soon begins to understand when he befriends a dog "Simp" - together they run away and have to survive on the streets which they do with the help of a paper boy.

The years have also seen the rise, through graft and corruption, of Pete Morano but he has just been visited by a voice from the past- yes, his former cast off mistress who has only been awaiting her chance to "get even"!! Into this mix comes the Hamiltons - Ed has been caught stealing food from them but they want to give him a chance to make good - and make good he does!!

Two stars of the future - sweet Lila Lee and handsome William Collier Jnr. play the young lovers, she is Vera, younger sister of Mr. Hamilton and he is Dick Armstrong, the lazy son of the town's richest citizen. He also wants a chance to prove himself worthy of Vera's love so Hamilton gives him a job - to retrieve some important papers that will incriminate Morano once and for all. But the film really belongs to 15 year old Lewis Sargent and he makes the movie his own. Unfortunately it didn't bring him the stardom he deserved - by 1922 he was mired in shorts except for his role as Noah Claypole in the prestigious "Oliver Twist".
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Somebody shot the director.
F Gwynplaine MacIntyre2 December 2007
A print of this so-called 'lost' film is in the Library of Congress, copied from a nitrate print which had an X-mark scratched into the last frames of each sequence. The print is intact with its original intertitles (some of them quite inventive). But the original tinting is lost, so we see that two day-for-night sequences were shot in broad daylight even though the titles identify them as taking place at night.

'The Soul of Youth' was directed by William Desmond Taylor. Unfortunately, any attempt to analyse Taylor's films or career is overshadowed by his notoriously unsolved murder. I believe that the solution in Sidney Kirkpatrick's book 'A Cast of Killers' is as near as we'll ever get to the truth.

This film is basically a social drama about a boy, abandoned in infancy and raised in a squalid orphanage, who attempts to make a place for himself in the world by fair or foul means. I wish that scenarist Julia Ivers (whose name appears TWICE in the opening credits) had let the power of this basic story work for itself; instead, she ladles on several subplots and needless coincidences of Dickensian dimensions. The boy (Ed Simpson) crosses paths with crooked politico Pete Morano in infancy, then crosses paths with him again in the main storyline ... but the first encounter was unnecessary to the story, and makes the second one seem contrived.

There are contrivances all through the movie. Morano and his henchmen miraculously know the identity of the man who's coming to town with documents that can put Morano in prison, and they miraculously know what train he'll be on. Morano's henchman miraculously knows which pocket of the man's jacket contains the documents, so he can surreptitiously slit just that one pocket to steal them. When young Ed climbs through Morano's window to retrieve the documents, the McGuffin papers are conveniently right there at the windowside ... so he can jump in, grab 'em and get out again.

Oddly, the actors are billed in order of appearance, as if this were a stage play. There are excellent performances here by child actors Lewis Sargent (as the orphan) and Ernest Butterworth (as a barefoot newsboy). Teenager William 'Buster' Collier Jnr is also good here, and at one point he (or his stunt double) gracefully and effortlessly leaps over a hedge. Lila Lee and child actress Elizabeth Janes are also excellent, but most of the other actors resort to silent-film histrionics of the worst sort. Betty Schade, as Morano's moll, presents him with the infant Ed while pretending she's just given birth to the child ... and, as soon as Morano turns briefly aside, her hands and face form a gloating tableau of deepest purple. In an earlier scene, when acquiring the baby while he's wrapped in a blanket, she unwraps his HEAD to discover the child's sex!

I found the scenes in the all-boy orphanage to be painfully realistic, having lived in a similar institution myself at an early age. There are two brief but surprising shots of a (black) boy entirely naked. This black boy was apparently raised in the same orphanage as the white lads, but he speaks in minstrel-show dialogue and he's named Rastus.

I was impressed by clever visual devices during several intertitles, and especially one during a fight sequence, when several boys' shouted comments radiate outward from the main title at different angles.

Benjamin Barr Lindsey, a prominent Denver jurist of this time, appears in the film as himself (with substantial screen time), and gives an ingratiating and natural performance. (A close-up of a telegram establishes that this story takes place in Denver.)

At the time of Taylor's murder in 1922, he had already established himself as an inventive silent-film director. We can only speculate what sort of career he might have had in talkies. I suspect that his career would have followed a similar arc to that of director Herbert Brenon, who achieved major success in the late silent era, then faltered badly with the arrival of sound. There are a couple of clever visual devices in 'The Soul of Youth' but also several clumsy passages; at one point, a crucial piece of plot information is conveyed via a close-up of a letter in handwriting that's unnecessarily elaborate and difficult to read. Amusingly, the film ends with a close-up of a dog's wagging tail. I'll rate 'The Soul of Youth' 6 out of 10.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Charming and Well-Done Tale on Life and Growing Up
Screen_O_Genic9 July 2020
Having long been familiar with William Desmond Taylor's mysterious death and recently reading about him I decided to go beyond the man's tragic myth and have a watch on his actual work. "The Soul of Youth" proves to be a good first impression depicting childhood and life with tenderness and humor. An abandoned infant is taken in an orphanage and the child grows into the rough and rowdy ways of such an environment. Given a chance by the law after a misdemeanor to better his life his story unravels into a rough and tumble odyssey into trial and redemption. Taylor was a good director eliciting solid performances from the cast. Although the film may be a little too languorous in pace for modern viewers the film is a pretty compelling watch from start to finish. Like any film of this vintage it's the glimpse into a bygone age that adds much to its appeal: the fashion, interiors, cars, acting and the manners and mores of people from way back then is a fascinating time travel that is moving and evokes a sense of wonder. Historical and entertaining, this century-old flick is a must see for silent movie fans and connoisseurs of film.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Heavy-handed but very watchable.
planktonrules16 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This film is part of a collection entitled "American Film Archives: Vol. 3: Disc 1". The DVDs deal specifically with American short films that deal with various social issues, though this is one of the few full-length films in the set. These are the sort of films that usually would be forgotten or lost had it not been for some film preservationists work. Now this set certainly isn't for everyone, as the content is a bit dry. However, for history teachers (like myself) and cinemaniacs (again, that would be me), it's an invaluable set.

This film is probably the most scandalous on the disk, as it tackles subjects such as drug abuse and unwed pregnancy. A lady gets pregnant but her heal of a boyfriend says he doesn't want the child. As a result, the child is dumped by the maid on the doorstep of a local orphanage.

The scene picks up now and the child is a teen. He is seen as troubled but the workers at the orphanage have no idea how to deal with him provide him with any love. Mostly, the boy is yelled at and made to work like all the other kids--some childhood, huh? The scene switches to the boy's biological father. The jerk is now the mayor and a neighbor, Mrs. Hodge, wants to adopt a child from the orphanage. As luck would have it, she appears ready to select this troubled boy. Oddly, however, in the next scenes he's still at the orphanage. You wonder if perhaps some of the film is missing.

In these scenes at the orphanage, you see that the child does have a conscience and has promise--showing kindness to a young boy in the orphanage as well as fighting to protect a dog being abused by some boys. However, when the staff find that he's kept the dog and is caring for it, they throw the animal out and the boy follows.

Now, living in the big city, he struggles to feed himself and the mutt. However, a boy selling newspapers feels sorry for him and invites him to live with him. The home turns out to be a tiny wooden shack where the boy lives alone. The runaway soon learns the ropes--how to make a buck--and most importantly, to look out for himself--even if it means committing petty crimes.

The scene switches back to the shifty Mayor. The boy's mother apparently has proof he's been on the take and threatens in a letter to destroy him. Hmm.

Now, back to the boy. He's caught stealing from Mr. Hamilton's home. He's away, but when the police catch the boy, she insists they take him to jail. Later, however, Mr. Hamilton finds out about this and goes to court--offering to let the boy live with his family. You can tell Mrs. Hamilton is less than thrilled! This is the same Mr. Hamilton, by the way, who is running against the crooked Mayor. No one realizes the boy is the Mayor's child.

During all this time, Dick (who is in love with Hamilton's sister) is on a mission to see that lady who can incriminate the Mayor. However, the dirty Mayor finds out that Dick's on this mission and steals the information right out of Dick's pocket. The orphan wants to help and sneaks into the Mayor's home and got the information back--but he gets sick as a result (this part made no sense at all by the way). In the end, the kid is a beloved hero. Now the lady who wanted to adopt the kid earlier is back--ready to adopt him. However, Mrs. Hamilton insists he stay. The end.

Overall, it's a very melodramatic and somewhat preachy film about giving adopted kids a second chance. While it certainly is heavy-handed, it also is entertaining and not bad for 1920. Decent and watchable, but certainly no classic.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed