Huckleberry Finn (1920) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Huckleberry Friends
wes-connors23 December 2011
This was the third of William Desmond Taylor's trilogy of films celebrating the adventures of Mark Train's famous Mississippi River lads. "Tom Sawyer" (1917), with Jack Pickford in the lead, was the first success. As Mr. Pickford's delinquent friend Huckleberry "Huck" Finn, Robert Gordon shared the good notices and made critics' annual best supporting actor lists. The sequel "Huck and Tom" (1918) reflected this it its title, though the film covered further events in Tom's book. Two years later, the "boys" were even more obviously too old for the parts, so Mr. Taylor cast younger Lewis Sargent in the pivotal role...

Gordon is missed, but Taylor wins you over by the time Mr. Sargent battles his deliriously drunken father Frank Lanning, who was striking as "Injun Joe" in the previous movie; their well-acted cabin scene elevates the film. Also making good impressions are "dancing" George Reed (as Jim) and Gordon Griffith (as Tom). Beautiful young Esther Ralston (as Mary Jane) has true grit. Sneaky uncles Orral Humphrey and Tom Bates are a lesser emphasized Duke and King. A top production of its time, Taylor's "Huckleberry Finn" was rescued from degeneration and restored by the good folks at the "George Eastman House".

******* Huckleberry Finn (2/22/20) William Desmond Taylor ~ Lewis Sargent, Gordon Griffith, George Reed, Esther Ralston
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The first--and perhaps best--adaptation of Twain's classic
Revelator_15 October 2018
The first film adaptation of Huckleberry Finn remains one of the best, despite the ravages of time and a major script problem. Filmed only a decade after Mark Twain's death, this film is free from the slickness of later Hollywood adaptations and has a truly convincing young lead instead of a cutesy child actor. As Huck, Lewis Sargent is completely convincing: he's a ragged, likable mutt that Twain would have approved of (as he does in the film!). He makes Mickey Rooney look like a well-groomed phony. George Reed plays a mature, sometimes sedate Jim, but he's undeserved by the script and missing footage (including his escape). Huck and Jim's friendship doesn't comes across as deeply as it should, despite the excellence of the actors, and that is a major flaw.

William Desmond Taylor is better known for his unsolved murder than his films, but he was a skilled director with a fluid, advanced style. This film's pacing and style were advanced for 1920 and hold up well today. The settings and art direction have rustic, old-time authenticity: the filmmakers emulated Edward W. Kemble's illustrations and shot the outdoors scenes in the Sacramento River Delta (where later Finns where shot as well, since it was closer to Los Angeles than the Mississippi River and looked just as good). Since the film only survived in an incomplete print held by the Danish Film Archive, the intertitles had to be translated and recreated by the George Eastman Museum, which used text direct from Twain.

There has yet to be a great film made from this classic novel, but Taylor's production features the best Huck and is the closest to Twain's own time, which makes it worth seeing more than most later films of Huckleberry Finn.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
First Adaptation Of Twain's Huckleberry Finn
CitizenCaine2 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The first major adaptation of Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn came to the screen in William Desmond Taylor's 1920 silent film. It was only one of three films Taylor directed and produced in his career before the scandal that took his life two years later. This version was adapted from Twain's novel by Julia Crawford Ivers. The film follows some of the major events of the book but misses the literary importance of the novel, so the film becomes a telling of a story rather then the exploration of its artistic merits, despite a few hints of the same. Child actor Lewis Sargent plays Finn in satisfactory fashion, but Frank Lanning, playing Huck's abusive father is quite exaggerated in typical silent era fashion. George Reed, as Jim, has little to do except for the escape scene. Reed began a long career in bit parts with this, his second film and first noticeable role.

The film was painstakingly restored by George Eastman House from a Danish print found overseas. The dialog had to be replaced with English and was designed to match the style of the era. The film contains several scenes in typical black and white which alternate with scenes that are tinted in yellow and blue at times, probably due to the condition of the footage when discovered. The film gets treated and restored, but any previous deterioration is difficult to overcome. Several brief scenes are missing in the film, primarily in the last ten minutes. The footage missing is mostly transitional, bridging scenes. The exception is the escape scene when Huck helps Jim escape. This film was the third in Taylor's trilogy of Twain films, the earlier being 1917 and 1918. Thus, Lewis Sargent replaced the aging Robert Gordon who played Huck Finn in the prior two films. Esther Ralston, who plays Mary Jane in the film, has her first noticeable role in her fourth film and later became a star. **1/2 of 4 stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The 16th Annual San Francisco Silent Film Festival, David Jeffers for SIFFblog2
rdjeffers9 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Huckleberry Finn (1920)

Friday July 15, 2pm, The Castro, San Francisco

An old maid adopts motherless Huckleberry Finn to "sivilize" his coarse, free-spirited behavior. Her plans are thwarted when the boy is kidnapped by his father, the abusive town drunk. Huck escapes by faking his own murder and befriends a runaway slave. Their tranquil life of rafting on the river is interrupted by two seedy con-men who sell Jim and involve Huck in fraud, while he masquerades as his best friend Tom Sawyer and falls in love.

Missing the satirical bite and social consciousness of Mark Twain's 1885 novel, director William Desmond Taylor's Huckleberry Finn (1920) displays a sentimental fondness for the story in a production that typifies the consistent quality associated with Taylor and Paramount Pictures. Huckleberry Finn is also noteworthy as the first theatrical film version of the book and for Esther Ralston's oldest surviving performance in a feature film, as the object of Huck's affection Mary Jane Wilkes.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice Version of Twain's Story
Michael_Elliott4 February 2012
Huckleberry Finn (1920)

*** (out of 4)

The now infamous William Desmond Taylor directed this very first adaptation of Mark Twain's novel, which has Lewis Sargent playing Huck. This is a fairly straight adaptation hitting on the key moments in the story has Huck and the runaway slave Jim (George Reed) head down the Mississippi River getting into one situation after another. This here was a lost film until 1962 when a print turned up in a Danish vault and it took until 2011 for George Eastman House to restore it. It should be noted that there were some issues doing this including them having to translate the title cards from Danish to English, which caused some of the dialogue to have to be taken directly from the novel. Another issue is that there are at least three sequences that are still missing and these here get a title card of what you should be seeing. With that said, I was pleasantly surprised to see how much I enjoyed this picture. Yes, it's not 100% the novel but then again very few films are that faithful. What I enjoyed most was the performance of Sargent who I thought was excellent in the role. I thought he brought a youthful energy to the part and I really couldn't help but think he's one of the best I've seen in the role. He certainly kept the character going at full speed and there's no question that he was fun to watch. Reed was also excellent in the role of Jim as he manages to bring some nice humor. Gordon Griffith is good as Tom Sawyer and Edythe Chapman also stands out as Aunt Polly. The direction is pretty good throughout as the pacing is nice and there's never really any slow moments.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great Movie
simko323 February 2004
This movie was fantastic. It definately is a lot different from the book but that's what made it so good. Movie is in good detail with the book even though they're quite different. the movie is very good and everyone should go see it.
2 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed