Mabel's Blunder (1914) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not a blunder to watch
hte-trasme16 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I hadn't seen much at of the work of the very famous silent-era comedian Mabel Normand, and I eventually decided to check out this one-reeler, having read it had been honored with an induction into the US National Film Registry. In only a few shots, Mabel establishes herself as expressive and captivating with natural comic timing, and her film itself, for such an early piece from just when film comedy was establishing itself as a form, covers a surprising amount of comic ground and had me laughing out loud a number of times.

The gag premise -- of Mabel jealous because she thinks her fiancé's sister is a mistress -- is a sound one, and unlike some other Sennett shorts of the era, this one doesn't seem just to stop at it. Instead, an impressive number of complications ensue for a film that runs only 10-15 minutes, and I especially laughed at Mabel's boss coming on to her brother, who is ineptly disguised a woman with a veil drawn tightly across his face.

A very young Charley Chase, future star of his own great series of comedy shorts, makes an appearance and amusing starts a fight with Mabel while she is still dressed as a man. The farcelike quality of the comedy meshes with his sense of humor; maybe he had something to do with the reportedly rather freewheeling production process as well.

I won't say this as a bad film at all to single out from the early Sennett output; it's genuinely funny and does a lot with the resources it has.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pretty good Mabel Normand short
Paularoc14 June 2012
The plot elements now seem old hat – a case of misunderstanding, cross dressing, and mistaken identity – but in 1914 it must have seemed new and hilarious to the audience. Mabel works as a secretary and is secretly engaged to the boss' son; the boss himself (the old lecher) has eyes on Mabel. Mabel mistakenly thinks that a woman she sees her fiancée kissing is his girlfriend and she aims to follow them to a party by switching clothes with her brother who happens to be the son's chauffeur. One of the interesting things about this short is how few title cards were used and yet how easy it was to follow the plot. Mabel had a very natural and expressive manner about her, which is clear from this one reeler. Not a great comedy short by any stretch but a good one and it was nice to see a good print of a Mabel Normand film. Thanks to the reviewer who pointed out that Al St. John and Charley Chase were in the film – I missed that.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not great, but for 1914 it's pretty good.
planktonrules18 May 2009
This is a rather star-studded film, though some of the future stars you may not recognize. The film is directed by and stars Mabel Normand--probably the first big female comedy star on screen. She is supported by Al St. John (frequently in support for Fatty Arbuckle, and later in talking Westerns) and Charley Chase (who blossomed into a headliner in the 1920s and 30s with Hal Roach Studios.

The film is a two-reel comedy about a lady who is engaged to the boss' son, though no one else knows it. When another lady comes to work and the boss pays her lots of attention, Mabel is jealous and dresses up as the son's chauffeur to spy on them. At the same time, Mabel's brother (St. John) is dressed up as Mabel and the boss begins to make the moves on him/her. It's one of the earlier cross-dressing comedies I've seen and is good for a few laughs.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clever, And Feminist
gavin69429 June 2016
Mabel (Mabel Normand) is engaged to Harry (Harry McCoy), the boss's son. The boss has an eye for Mabel too, in this gender-bending comedy of errors and mistaken identities.

Some have said this film is not that great, but okay "for the time". Actually, I think it is rather good. The doppelganger aspect, the costume changes, the "gender-bending"... this has quite a few interesting and innovative ideas.

What I find most interesting is the "feminist" aspect. Mabel Norman not only stars, but writes and directs. She is not very well known today, or for those who do know her, she is often seen as second fiddle to Charlie Chaplin. This film proves she is more than that... she was a talented artist in her own right.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
RomComs 100 years ago
Horst_In_Translation13 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I believe that Mabel Normand was a great talent early in the 20th century. This short film here, she wrote, directed and starred in and even at the age of 21, this was far from her first time behind the camera. Normand was such fun to watch in her movies and I always thought she was truly stunning as well and both applies also to this film. Unfortunately, it was really difficult because of the lack of more intertitles to exactly understand what's going on, so I cannot rate it higher. I think there was some mix-up with brothers, sisters and love relationship, which became obvious in the end, but way after Mabel commit the "blunder" that the title refers to. I don't think, this black-and-white silent film is among her best works. Check out some of her other stuff. Rip Mabel. Thank you for the movies.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not very strong
deickemeyer11 February 2019
Mabel mistakes her lover's sister for a rival in her affections. She acts as their chauffeur and the principals all go to a restaurant, A slap stick finish results, but the humor of this is not very strong. - The Moving Picture World, September 19, 1914
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed